Abstract
There are many sources of uncertainty in satellite precipitation retrievals of warm rain. In this paper, the second of a two-part study, we focus on uncertainties related to spatial heterogeneity and surface clutter. A cloud-resolving model simulation of warm, shallow clouds is used to simulate satellite observations from three theoretical satellite architectures—one similar to the Global Precipitation Measurement Core Observatory, one similar to CloudSat, and one similar to the planned Atmosphere Observing System (AOS). Rain rates are then retrieved using a common optimal estimation framework. For this case, retrieval biases due to nonuniform beamfilling are very large, with retrieved rain rates negatively (low) biased by as much as 40%–50% (depending on satellite architecture) at 5 km horizontal resolution. Surface clutter also acts to negatively bias retrieved rain rates. Combining all sources of uncertainty, the theoretical AOS satellite is found to outperform CloudSat in terms of retrieved surface rain rate, with a bias of −19% as compared with −28%, a reduced spread of retrieval errors, and an additional 17.5% of cases falling within desired uncertainty limits. The results speak to the need for additional high-resolution modeling simulations of warm rain so as to better characterize the uncertainties in satellite precipitation retrievals.
© 2023 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).
