Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Drivers of Snowfall Accumulation in the Central Idaho Mountains Using Long-Term High-Resolution WRF Simulations

Mikell Warms aDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Mikell Warms in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Katja Friedrich aDepartment of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Katja Friedrich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Lulin Xue bResearch Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Lulin Xue in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Sarah Tessendorf bResearch Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Sarah Tessendorf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Kyoko Ikeda bResearch Applications Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Kyoko Ikeda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Online Publication:
08 Sep 2023
Print Publication:
01 Sep 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-23-0050.1
Page(s):
1279–1295
Restricted access

Abstract

The western United States region, an economic and agricultural powerhouse, is highly dependent on winter snowpack from the mountain west. Coupled with increasing water and renewable electricity demands, the predictability and viability of snowpack resources in a changing climate are becoming increasingly important. In Idaho, specifically, up to 75% of the state’s electricity production comes from hydropower, which is dependent on the timing and volume of spring snowmelt. While we know that 1 April snowpack is declining from SNOTEL observations and is expected to continue to decline as indicated by GCM predictions, our ability to understand the variability of snowfall accumulation and distribution at the regional level is less robust. In this paper, we analyze snowfall events using 0.9-km-resolution WRF simulations to understand the variability of snowfall accumulation and distribution in the mountains of Idaho between 1 October 2016 and 31 April 2017. Various characteristics of snowfall events throughout the season are evaluated, including the spatial coverage, event durations, and snowfall rates, along with the relationship between cloud microphysical variables—particularly liquid and ice water content—on snowfall amounts. Our findings suggest that efficient snowfall conditions—for example, higher levels of elevated supercooled liquid water—can exist throughout the winter season but are more impactful when surface temperatures are near or below freezing. Inefficient snowfall events are common, exceeding 50% of the total snowfall events for the year, with some of those occurring in peak winter. For such events, glaciogenic cloud seeding could make a significant impact on snowpack development and viability in the region.

Significance Statement

The purpose and significance of this study is to better understand the variability of snowfall event accumulation and distribution in the Payette Mountains region of Idaho as it relates to the local topography, the drivers of snowfall events, the cloud microphysical properties, and what constitutes an efficient or inefficient snowfall event (i.e., its ability to convert atmospheric liquid water into snowfall). As part of this process, we identify how many snowfall events in a season are inefficient to determine the number of snowfall events in a season that are candidates for enhancement by glaciogenic cloud seeding.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mikell Warms, mikell.warms@colorado.edu

Abstract

The western United States region, an economic and agricultural powerhouse, is highly dependent on winter snowpack from the mountain west. Coupled with increasing water and renewable electricity demands, the predictability and viability of snowpack resources in a changing climate are becoming increasingly important. In Idaho, specifically, up to 75% of the state’s electricity production comes from hydropower, which is dependent on the timing and volume of spring snowmelt. While we know that 1 April snowpack is declining from SNOTEL observations and is expected to continue to decline as indicated by GCM predictions, our ability to understand the variability of snowfall accumulation and distribution at the regional level is less robust. In this paper, we analyze snowfall events using 0.9-km-resolution WRF simulations to understand the variability of snowfall accumulation and distribution in the mountains of Idaho between 1 October 2016 and 31 April 2017. Various characteristics of snowfall events throughout the season are evaluated, including the spatial coverage, event durations, and snowfall rates, along with the relationship between cloud microphysical variables—particularly liquid and ice water content—on snowfall amounts. Our findings suggest that efficient snowfall conditions—for example, higher levels of elevated supercooled liquid water—can exist throughout the winter season but are more impactful when surface temperatures are near or below freezing. Inefficient snowfall events are common, exceeding 50% of the total snowfall events for the year, with some of those occurring in peak winter. For such events, glaciogenic cloud seeding could make a significant impact on snowpack development and viability in the region.

Significance Statement

The purpose and significance of this study is to better understand the variability of snowfall event accumulation and distribution in the Payette Mountains region of Idaho as it relates to the local topography, the drivers of snowfall events, the cloud microphysical properties, and what constitutes an efficient or inefficient snowfall event (i.e., its ability to convert atmospheric liquid water into snowfall). As part of this process, we identify how many snowfall events in a season are inefficient to determine the number of snowfall events in a season that are candidates for enhancement by glaciogenic cloud seeding.

© 2023 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Mikell Warms, mikell.warms@colorado.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 0.2876 MB)
Save
Cover Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

  • Alexander, M. A., J. D. Scott, D. Swales, M. Hughes, K. Mahoney, and C. A. Smith, 2015: Moisture pathways into the U.S. Intermountain West associated with heavy winter precipitation events. J. Hydrometeor., 16, 1184–1206, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0139.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Barlow, M., and Coauthors, 2019: North American extreme precipitation events and related large-scale meteorological patterns: A review of statistical methods, dynamics, modeling, and trends. Climate Dyn., 53, 6835–6875, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04958-z.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cann, M. D., and K. Friedrich, 2020: The role of moisture pathways on snowfall amount and distribution in the Payette Mountains of Idaho. Mon. Wea. Rev., 148, 2033–2048, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0350.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Chen, F., and Coauthors, 2014: Modeling seasonal snowpack evolution in the complex terrain and forested Colorado headwaters region: A model intercomparison study. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 119, 13 795–13 819, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022167.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dettinger, M., B. Udall, and A. Georgakakos, 2015: Western water and climate change. Ecol. Appl., 25, 2069–2093, https://doi.org/10.1890/15-0938.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dudley, R. W., G. A. Hodgkins, M. R. McHale, M. J. Kolian, and B. Renard, 2017: Trends in snowmelt-related streamflow timing in the conterminous United States. J. Hydrol., 547, 208–221, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.01.051.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • ECMWF, 2011: The ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset. Copernicus Climate Change Service, accessed 1 April 2018, https://www.ecmwf.int/en/forecasts/datasets/archive-datasets/reanalysis-datasets/era-interim.

  • French, J. R., and Coauthors, 2018: Precipitation formation from orographic cloud seeding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 1168–1173, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716995115.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Friedrich, K., and Coauthors, 2020: Quantifying snowfall from orographic cloud seeding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 5190–5195, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1917204117.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Fukuta, N., and T. Takahashi, 1999: The growth of atmospheric ice crystals: A summary of findings in vertical supercooled cloud tunnel studies. J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 1963–1979, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<1963:TGOAIC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Iacono, M. J., J. S. Delamere, E. J. Mlawer, M. W. Shephard, S. A. Clough, and W. D. Collins, 2008: Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13103, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009944.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kharin, V. V., F. W. Zwiers, X. Zhang, and M. Wehner, 2013: Changes in temperature and precipitation extremes in the CMIP5 ensemble. Climatic Change, 119, 345–357, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0705-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Laiho, R., K. Friedrich, and A. C. Winters, 2023: Characteristics of warm season heavy rainfall in Minnesota. Wea. Forecasting, 38, 163–177, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-21-0186.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Liu, X., F. Chen, M. Barlage, G. Zhou, and D. Niyogi, 2016: Noah-MP-Crop: Introducing dynamic crop growth in the Noah-MP land surface model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 13 953–13 972, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025597.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Livneh, B., and A. M. Badger, 2020: Drought less predictable under declining future snowpack. Nat. Climate Change, 10, 452–458, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0754-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ludlam, F. H., 1955: Artificial snowfall from mountain clouds. Tellus, 7, 277–290, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v7i3.8908.

  • Mitchell, D. L., R. Zhang, and R. L. Pitter, 1990: Mass dimensional relationships for ice particles and the influence of riming on snowfall rates. J. Appl. Meteor., 29, 153–163, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<0153:MDRFIP>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Mote, P. W., A. F. Hamlet, M. P. Clark, and D. P. Lettenmaier, 2005: Declining mountain snowpack in western North America. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 86, 39–50, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Nakanishi, M., and H. Niino, 2006: An improved Mellor–Yamada level-3 model: Its numerical stability and application to a regional prediction of advection fog. Bound.-Layer Meteor., 119, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-005-9030-8.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • National Water and Climate Center, 2022: Snow telemetry (SNOTEL) and snow course data and products. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed 1 May 2023, www.wcc.nrcs.usda.gov/snow/index.html.

  • Niu, G.-Y., and Coauthors, 2011: The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • O’Gorman, P. A., 2014: Contrasting responses of mean and extreme snowfall to climate change. Nature, 512, 416–418, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ralph, F. M., J. J. Rutz, J. M. Cordeira, M. Dettinger, M. Anderson, D. Reynolds, L. J. Schick, and C. Smallcomb, 2019: A scale to characterize the strength and impacts of atmospheric rivers. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 269–289, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0023.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rasmussen, R. M., and Coauthors, 2011: High-resolution coupled climate runoff simulations of seasonal snowfall over Colorado: A process study of current and warmer climate. J. Climate, 24, 3015–3048, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JCLI3985.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rauber, R. M., and L. O. Grant, 1986: The characteristics and distribution of cloud water over the mountains of northern Colorado during wintertime storms. Part II: Spatial distribution and microphysical characteristics. J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 489–504., https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1986)025<0489:TCADOC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rauber, R. M., and Coauthors, 2019: Wintertime orographic cloud seeding—A review. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 58, 2117–2140, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0341.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Rutz, J. J., W. J. Steenburgh, and F. M. Ralph, 2014: Climatological characteristics of atmospheric rivers and their inland penetration over the western United States. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 905–921, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00168.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Stewart, I. T., D. R. Cayan, and M. D. Dettinger, 2005: Changes toward earlier streamflow timing across western North America. J. Climate, 18, 1136–1155, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3321.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Takahashi, T., T. Endoh, and G. Wakahama, 1991: Vapor diffusional growth of free-falling snow crystals between −3 and −23°C. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 69, 15–30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Tessendorf, S. A., and Coauthors, 2018: Idaho power cloud seeding: Phase seven study. NCAR Final Rep., 113 pp.

  • Tessendorf, S. A., and Coauthors, 2019: A transformational approach to winter orographic weather modification research: The SNOWIE project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 100, 71–92, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0152.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Thompson, G., and T. Eidhammer, 2014: A study of aerosol impacts on clouds and precipitation development in a large winter cyclone. J. Atmos. Sci., 71, 3636–3658, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-13-0305.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2016: Idaho electricity profile 2016: Electric power industry generation by primary energy source, 1990 through 2016. Accessed 1 April 2023, https://www.eia.gov/electricity/state/archive/2016/idaho/.

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2022: Idaho electricity profile 2022: Electric power industry generation by primary energy source, 2022. Accessed 1 May 2023, https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=ID.

  • Xue, L., and Coauthors, 2022: Comparison between observed and simulated AgI seeding impacts in a well-observed case from the SNOWIE field program. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 61, 345–367, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-21-0103.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 687 687 54
Full Text Views 159 159 6
PDF Downloads 156 156 7