ECMWF and SSM/I Global Surface Wind Speeds

David Halpern Earth and Space Sciences Division, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

Search for other papers by David Halpern in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anthony Hollingsworth European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Anthony Hollingsworth in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frank Wentz Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa, California

Search for other papers by Frank Wentz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Monthly mean 2.5° × 2.5° resolution 10-m-height wind speeds from the Special Sensor Microwavelimager (SSM/I) instrument and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) forecast-analysis system are compared between 60°S and 60°N during 1988–91. The SSM/I data were uniformly processed while numerous changes were made to the ECMWF forecast-analysis system. The SSM/I measurements, which were compared with moored-buoy wind observations, were used as a reference dataset to evaluate the influence of the changes made to the ECMWF system upon the ECMWF surface wind speed over the ocean. A demonstrable yearly decrease of the difference between SSM/I and ECMWF wind speeds occurred in the 10°S–10°N region, including the 5°S–5°N zone of the Pacific Ocean, where nearly all of the variations occurred in the 160°E–160°W region. The apparent improvement of the ECMWF wind speed occurred at the same time as the yearly decrease of the equatorial Pacific SSM/I wind speed, which was associated with the natural transition from El Niña to El Niño conditions. In the 10°S–10°N tropical Atlantic, the ECMWF wind speed had a 4-yr trend, which was not expected nor was it duplicated with the SSM/I data. No yearly trend was found in the difference between SSM/I and ECMWF surface wind speeds in middle latitudes of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The magnitude of the differences between SSM/I and ECMWF was 0.4 m s−1 or 100% larger in the Northern than in the Southern Hemisphere extratropies. In two areas (Arabian Sea and North Atlantic Ocean) where ECMWF and SSM/I wind speeds were compared to ship measurement the ship data had much better agreement with the ECMWF analyses compared to SSM/I data. In the 10°S–10°N area the difference between monthly standard deviations of the daily wind speeds dropped significantly from 1988 to 1989 but remained constant at about 30% for the remaining years.

Abstract

Monthly mean 2.5° × 2.5° resolution 10-m-height wind speeds from the Special Sensor Microwavelimager (SSM/I) instrument and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) forecast-analysis system are compared between 60°S and 60°N during 1988–91. The SSM/I data were uniformly processed while numerous changes were made to the ECMWF forecast-analysis system. The SSM/I measurements, which were compared with moored-buoy wind observations, were used as a reference dataset to evaluate the influence of the changes made to the ECMWF system upon the ECMWF surface wind speed over the ocean. A demonstrable yearly decrease of the difference between SSM/I and ECMWF wind speeds occurred in the 10°S–10°N region, including the 5°S–5°N zone of the Pacific Ocean, where nearly all of the variations occurred in the 160°E–160°W region. The apparent improvement of the ECMWF wind speed occurred at the same time as the yearly decrease of the equatorial Pacific SSM/I wind speed, which was associated with the natural transition from El Niña to El Niño conditions. In the 10°S–10°N tropical Atlantic, the ECMWF wind speed had a 4-yr trend, which was not expected nor was it duplicated with the SSM/I data. No yearly trend was found in the difference between SSM/I and ECMWF surface wind speeds in middle latitudes of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The magnitude of the differences between SSM/I and ECMWF was 0.4 m s−1 or 100% larger in the Northern than in the Southern Hemisphere extratropies. In two areas (Arabian Sea and North Atlantic Ocean) where ECMWF and SSM/I wind speeds were compared to ship measurement the ship data had much better agreement with the ECMWF analyses compared to SSM/I data. In the 10°S–10°N area the difference between monthly standard deviations of the daily wind speeds dropped significantly from 1988 to 1989 but remained constant at about 30% for the remaining years.

Save