Intercomparison of ADCP Measurements at 0°, 140°W

Ren-Chieh Lien Applied Physics Laboratory and School of Oceanography, College of Ocean and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington. Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Ren-Chieh Lien in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael J. McPhaden Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Michael J. McPhaden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dave Rebert College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon

Search for other papers by Dave Rebert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Three sets of horizontal velocity measurements obtained within 3 miles of each other at 0°, 140°W are compared. Measurements were taken by acoustic Doppler current Profilers (ADCPs) on different platforms, with different tracking filter configurations, and were processed by three different groups. A veraged over more than 12 days, mean velocity measurements differ by less than 1 cm s−1 at most depths. This discrepancy is about the same as the skew error of ADCP measurements. The rms value of residual velocity components for measurements averaged over 5–6 min is 0(5 cm s−1). These residuals are due to the combined effects of navigational errors and spatial variability in the oceanic velocity field. The estimated navigational error has an rms value of 2–3 cm s−1 for each velocity component. Meridional gradients of the Equatorial Undercurrent estimated from transient velocity differences and ship-buoy separations agree with those estimated from meridional transect data.

Abstract

Three sets of horizontal velocity measurements obtained within 3 miles of each other at 0°, 140°W are compared. Measurements were taken by acoustic Doppler current Profilers (ADCPs) on different platforms, with different tracking filter configurations, and were processed by three different groups. A veraged over more than 12 days, mean velocity measurements differ by less than 1 cm s−1 at most depths. This discrepancy is about the same as the skew error of ADCP measurements. The rms value of residual velocity components for measurements averaged over 5–6 min is 0(5 cm s−1). These residuals are due to the combined effects of navigational errors and spatial variability in the oceanic velocity field. The estimated navigational error has an rms value of 2–3 cm s−1 for each velocity component. Meridional gradients of the Equatorial Undercurrent estimated from transient velocity differences and ship-buoy separations agree with those estimated from meridional transect data.

Save