Performance Characteristics of a High-Sensitivity, Three-Wavelength, Total Scatter/Backscatter Nephelometer

T.L. Anderson * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by T.L. Anderson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D.S. Covert * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by D.S. Covert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S.F. Marshall * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by S.F. Marshall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M.L. Laucks * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by M.L. Laucks in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R.J. Charlson * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by R.J. Charlson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A.P. Waggoner * Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by A.P. Waggoner in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J.A. Ogren @NOAA/Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by J.A. Ogren in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Caldow &TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, Minnesota

Search for other papers by R. Caldow in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R.L. Holm &TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, Minnesota

Search for other papers by R.L. Holm in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
F.R. Quant &TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, Minnesota

Search for other papers by F.R. Quant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G.J. Sem &TSI Incorporated, St. Paul, Minnesota

Search for other papers by G.J. Sem in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. Wiedensohler ** Institut für Troposphärenforschung e. V., Leipzig, Germany

Search for other papers by A. Wiedensohler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N.A. Ahlquist ††FloScan Instrument Company, Incorporated, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by N.A. Ahlquist in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
T.S. Bates ##NOAA/Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by T.S. Bates in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

As designed in the 1940s by Beuttell and Brewer, the integrating nephelometer offers a direct method of measuring light scattering by airborne particles without assumptions about particle composition, shape, or physical state. A large number of such instruments have been deployed; however, only a limited number of validation experiments have been attempted. This paper reports a set of closure experiments in which a gas-calibrated nephelometer is used to measure the scattering coefficient of laboratory-generated particles of known size and refractive index.

Specifically, it evaluates the performance of a high-sensitivity, three-wavelength, total scatter/backscatter integrating nephelometer (TSI, Inc., model 3563). Sources of uncertainty associated with the gas-calibration procedure, with photon-counting statistics, and with nonidealities in wavelength and angular sensitivity are investigated. Tests with particle-free gases indicate that noise levels are well predicted by photon-counting statistics and that the nephelometer response is linear over a wide range of scattering coefficients. Tests with particles show average discrepancies between measured and predicted scattering of 4%–7%. Error analysis indicates that these discrepancies are within experimental uncertainty, which was dominated by particle generation uncertainty. The simulation of nephelometer response, which is validated by these tests, is used to show that errors arising from nephelometer nonidealities are less than 10% for accumulation-mode or smaller particles (i.e., size distributions for which the volume mean diameter is 0.4µm or less) and that significant differences exist between the total scatter and backscatter uncertainties. Based on these findings, appropriate applications of the model 3563 nephelometer am discussed.

Abstract

As designed in the 1940s by Beuttell and Brewer, the integrating nephelometer offers a direct method of measuring light scattering by airborne particles without assumptions about particle composition, shape, or physical state. A large number of such instruments have been deployed; however, only a limited number of validation experiments have been attempted. This paper reports a set of closure experiments in which a gas-calibrated nephelometer is used to measure the scattering coefficient of laboratory-generated particles of known size and refractive index.

Specifically, it evaluates the performance of a high-sensitivity, three-wavelength, total scatter/backscatter integrating nephelometer (TSI, Inc., model 3563). Sources of uncertainty associated with the gas-calibration procedure, with photon-counting statistics, and with nonidealities in wavelength and angular sensitivity are investigated. Tests with particle-free gases indicate that noise levels are well predicted by photon-counting statistics and that the nephelometer response is linear over a wide range of scattering coefficients. Tests with particles show average discrepancies between measured and predicted scattering of 4%–7%. Error analysis indicates that these discrepancies are within experimental uncertainty, which was dominated by particle generation uncertainty. The simulation of nephelometer response, which is validated by these tests, is used to show that errors arising from nephelometer nonidealities are less than 10% for accumulation-mode or smaller particles (i.e., size distributions for which the volume mean diameter is 0.4µm or less) and that significant differences exist between the total scatter and backscatter uncertainties. Based on these findings, appropriate applications of the model 3563 nephelometer am discussed.

Save