Preliminary Results from Long-Term Measurements of Atmospheric Moisture in the Marine Boundary Layer in the Gulf of Mexico*

Laurence C. Breaker National Weather Service, NCEP, NOAA, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by Laurence C. Breaker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David B. Gilhousen National Weather Service, National Data Buoy Center, NOAA, Stennis Space Center, Mississippi

Search for other papers by David B. Gilhousen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lawrence D. Burroughs National Weather Service, NCEP, NOAA, Washington, D.C.

Search for other papers by Lawrence D. Burroughs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Measurements of boundary layer moisture have been acquired from Rotronic MP-100 sensors deployed on two National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoys in the northern Gulf of Mexico from June through November 1993. For one sensor that was retrieved approximately 8 months after deployment and a second sensor that was retrieved about 14 months after deployment, the pre- and postcalibrations agreed closely and fell within WMO specifications for accuracy. A second Rotronic sensor on one of the buoys provided the basis for a detailed comparison of the instruments and showed close agreement. A separate comparison of the Rotronic instrument with an HO-83 hygrometer at NDBC showed generally close agreement over a 1-month period, which included a number of fog events. The buoy observations of relative humidity and supporting data from the buoys were used to calculate specific humidity. Specific humidities from the buoys were compared with specific humidities computed from observations obtained from nearby ship reports, and the correlations were generally high (0.7–0.9). Uncertainties in the calculated values of specific humidity were also estimated and ranged between 0.27% and 2.1% of the mean value, depending on the method used to estimate this quantity.

The time series of specific humidity revealed three primary scales of variability: small scale (of the order of hours), synoptic scale (several days), and seasonal (several months). The synoptic-scale variability was clearly dominant; it was eventlike in character and occurred primarily during September, October, and November. Most of the synoptic-scale variability was due to frontal systems that dropped down into the Gulf of Mexico from the continental United States, followed by air masses that were cold and dry. One particularly intense event on 30 October 1993 was chosen for a more detailed analysis in terms of the characteristic return-flow cycles that occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico during fall and winter. Finally, cross-correlation analyses of the buoy data indicated that the prevailing weather systems generally entered the buoy domain from the south prior to September; thereafter, they became more coherent and tended to enter the region from the north.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Laurence Breaker, NOAA, NCEP/EMC—Ocean Modeling Branch, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20748.

Email: Lbreaker@sun1.wwb.noaa.gov

Abstract

Measurements of boundary layer moisture have been acquired from Rotronic MP-100 sensors deployed on two National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) buoys in the northern Gulf of Mexico from June through November 1993. For one sensor that was retrieved approximately 8 months after deployment and a second sensor that was retrieved about 14 months after deployment, the pre- and postcalibrations agreed closely and fell within WMO specifications for accuracy. A second Rotronic sensor on one of the buoys provided the basis for a detailed comparison of the instruments and showed close agreement. A separate comparison of the Rotronic instrument with an HO-83 hygrometer at NDBC showed generally close agreement over a 1-month period, which included a number of fog events. The buoy observations of relative humidity and supporting data from the buoys were used to calculate specific humidity. Specific humidities from the buoys were compared with specific humidities computed from observations obtained from nearby ship reports, and the correlations were generally high (0.7–0.9). Uncertainties in the calculated values of specific humidity were also estimated and ranged between 0.27% and 2.1% of the mean value, depending on the method used to estimate this quantity.

The time series of specific humidity revealed three primary scales of variability: small scale (of the order of hours), synoptic scale (several days), and seasonal (several months). The synoptic-scale variability was clearly dominant; it was eventlike in character and occurred primarily during September, October, and November. Most of the synoptic-scale variability was due to frontal systems that dropped down into the Gulf of Mexico from the continental United States, followed by air masses that were cold and dry. One particularly intense event on 30 October 1993 was chosen for a more detailed analysis in terms of the characteristic return-flow cycles that occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico during fall and winter. Finally, cross-correlation analyses of the buoy data indicated that the prevailing weather systems generally entered the buoy domain from the south prior to September; thereafter, they became more coherent and tended to enter the region from the north.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Laurence Breaker, NOAA, NCEP/EMC—Ocean Modeling Branch, 5200 Auth Road, Camp Springs, MD 20748.

Email: Lbreaker@sun1.wwb.noaa.gov

Save
  • Breaker, L. C., D. B. Gilhousen, H. L. Tolman, and L. D. Burroughs, 1998: Initial results from long-term measurements of atmospheric humidity and related parameters in the marine boundary layer at two locations in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Mar. Syst., in press.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Coantic, M., and C. A. Friehe, 1980: Slow-response humidity sensors. AirSea Interaction in Instruments and Methods, F. Dobson, L. Hasse, and R. Davis, Eds., Plenum Press, 399–411.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Crane, J., and D. Boole, 1988: Thin film humidity sensors: A rising technology. Sensors,5, 32–35.

  • Crescenti, G. H., R. E. Payne, and R. A. Weller, 1990: Improved meteorological measurements from buoys and ships (IMET): Preliminary comparison of humidity sensors. Woods Hole Tech. Rep. WHOI-90–18, 57 pp. [Available from Document Library, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543.].

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Crisp, C. A., and J. M. Lewis, 1992: Return flow in the Gulf of Mexico. Part I: A classificatory approach with a global historical perspective. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 868–881.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • DiMego, G. J., L. F. Bosart, and G. W. Endersen, 1976: An examination of the frequency and mean conditions surrounding frontal incursions into the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 709–718.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gilhousen, D. B., 1987: A field evaluation of NDBC moored buoy winds. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 94–104.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Vol. 30, International Geophysics Series, Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Henry, W. K., 1979: Some aspects of the fate of cold fronts in the Gulf of Mexico. Mon. Wea. Rev.,107, 1078–1082.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hundermark, B. W., 1989: Field evaluation of the Rotronic humidity sensor and the impulsphysik visibility sensor. Proc. Conf. and Exposition on Marine Data Systems, New Orleans, LA, Mar. Tech. Soc., 81–85.

  • Katsaros, K. B., and Coauthors, 1994: Measurements of humidity and temperature in the marine environment during the HEXOS main experiment. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 964–981.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kraus, E. B., and J. A. Businger, 1994: Atmosphere–Ocean Interaction. 2d ed. Clarendon Press, 362 pp.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • List, R. J., 1966: Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Smithsonian Institution, 527 pp.

  • Muller, S. A., and P. J. Beekman, 1987: A test of commercial humidity sensors for use at automatic weather stations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 731–735.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Panofsky, H. A., and J. A. Dutton, 1984: Atmospheric Turbulence. Wiley, 397 pp.

  • Semmer, S. R., 1987: Evaluation of a capacitance humidity sensor. Sixth Symp. on Meteor. Observations and Instrumentation, New Orleans, LA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 223–225.

  • Taylor, J. R., 1982: An Introduction to Error Analysis. University Science Books, 270 pp.

  • van der Meulen, J. P., 1988: On the need of appropriate filter techniques to be considered using electrical humidity sensors. Proc. WMO Tech. Conf. on Instruments and Methods of Observation (TECO-1988), Leipzig, Germany, World Meteor. Org., 55–60.

  • Visscher, G. J. W., and K. Schurer, 1985: Some research on the stability of several capacitive thin film (polymer) humidity sensors in practice. Proc. 1985 Int. Symp. on Moisture and Humidity, Washington, DC, Instrument Soc. Amer., 515–523.

  • Weiss, S. J., 1992: Some aspects of forecasting severe thunderstorms during cool-season return-flow episodes. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 964–982.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • World Meteorological Organization, 1983: Measurement of atmospheric humidity. Guide to Meteorological Instruments and Methods of Observation, 5th ed., World Meteor. Org., 5.1–5.12.

  • Wu, J., 1980: Wind-stress coefficients over sea surface near neutral conditions—A revisit. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,10, 727–740.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 159 33 4
PDF Downloads 49 14 2