Improvements of Droplet Size Distribution Measurements with the Fast-FSSP (Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe)

Jean-Louis Brenguier Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Jean-Louis Brenguier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thierry Bourrianne Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Thierry Bourrianne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Afraniode Araujo Coelho Cloud Physics Laboratory, Federal University of Ceara, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

Search for other papers by Afraniode Araujo Coelho in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jacques Isbert ONERA-CERT (DERO), Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Jacques Isbert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert Peytavi Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Robert Peytavi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dominique Trevarin Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France

Search for other papers by Dominique Trevarin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Perry Weschler Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming

Search for other papers by Perry Weschler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The basics of single particle measurements are discussed and illustrated with measurements of the droplet size distribution with an optical spectrometer, the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP), and its improved version, the Fast-FSSP. The various sources of uncertainties are successively analyzed: the statistical significance of an incomplete sampling of the particle population, counting losses due to coincidence of particles and electronic dead time of the counter, artificial broadening of the size distributions by the coincidences, inhomogeneities of the sensitive volume of the probe, ambiguities of the Mie scattering curve, errors on the sampled volume, and, finally, the uncertainties on the size calibration of the instrument. It is demonstrated with examples of data collected with the Fast-FSSP that additional parameters, such as the pulse duration and the interarrival times between detections, are crucial for improving the sizing of the particles and the retrieval of the spatial evolution of the size distribution at the smallest scales.

* Additional affiliation: National Center for Atmospheric Research/ATD+MMM, Boulder, Colorado.

Additional affiliation: CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jean-Louis Brenguier, Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI/MNP, 42 av. Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, Cedex 01, France.

Email: jlb@meteo.fr

Abstract

The basics of single particle measurements are discussed and illustrated with measurements of the droplet size distribution with an optical spectrometer, the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP), and its improved version, the Fast-FSSP. The various sources of uncertainties are successively analyzed: the statistical significance of an incomplete sampling of the particle population, counting losses due to coincidence of particles and electronic dead time of the counter, artificial broadening of the size distributions by the coincidences, inhomogeneities of the sensitive volume of the probe, ambiguities of the Mie scattering curve, errors on the sampled volume, and, finally, the uncertainties on the size calibration of the instrument. It is demonstrated with examples of data collected with the Fast-FSSP that additional parameters, such as the pulse duration and the interarrival times between detections, are crucial for improving the sizing of the particles and the retrieval of the spatial evolution of the size distribution at the smallest scales.

* Additional affiliation: National Center for Atmospheric Research/ATD+MMM, Boulder, Colorado.

Additional affiliation: CNRM/GMEI, Toulouse, France.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jean-Louis Brenguier, Météo-France, CNRM/GMEI/MNP, 42 av. Coriolis, 31057 Toulouse, Cedex 01, France.

Email: jlb@meteo.fr

Save
  • Baumgardner, D., 1986: A new technique for the study of cloud microstructure. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,3, 340–343.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and M. Spowart, 1990: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part III: Time response and laser inhomogeneity limitations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,7, 666–672.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, W. Strapp, and J. E. Dye, 1985: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part II: Corrections for coincidence and dead-time losses. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,2, 626–632.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, J. E. Dye, and B. W. Gandrud, 1992: Interpretation of measurements made by the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe (FSSP-300) during the airborne Arctic stratospheric expedition. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 8035–8046.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, B. Baker, and K. Weaver, 1993: A technique for the measurement of cloud structure on centimeters scales. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,10, 557–565.

  • Brenguier, J. L., 1989: Coincidence and dead-time corrections for particle counters. Part II: High concentration measurements with an FSSP. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,6, 585–598.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, 1993: Observations of cloud microstructure at the centimeter scale. J. Appl. Meteor.,32, 783–793.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and L. Amodei, 1989: Coincidence and dead-time corrections for particle counters. Part I: A general mathematical formalism. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,6, 575–584.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • ——, and L. Chaumat, 1996: Condensational droplet growth in cumulus clouds. Preprints, 12th Int. Conf. on Clouds and Precipitation, Zurich, Switzerland, 57–60.

  • ——, D. Baumgardner, and B. Baker, 1994: A review and discussion of processing algorithms for FSSP concentration measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,11, 1409–1414.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Coelho, A., 1996: Mesure Aéroportée de la distribution dimensionnelle des gouttelettes d’eau en nuage. Ph.D. thesis, No. 2246, University of Toulouse 151 pp. [Available from Laboratoire Aerologie, OMP, 14, av. E. Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France.].

  • Cooper, W. A., 1988: Effects of coincidence on measurements with a Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 823–832.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dye, J. E., and D. Baumgardner, 1984: Evaluation of the Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. Part I: Electronic and optical studies. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,1, 329–344.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kim, Y. J., and J. F. Boatman, 1990: Corrections for the effects of particle trajectory and beam intensity profile on the size spectra of atmospheric aerosols measured with a Forward Scattering Spectrometer Probe. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,7, 673–680.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Norment, H. G., 1988: Three-dimensional trajectory analysis of two drop sizing instruments: PMS OAP and PMS FSSP. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,5, 743–756.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Pawlowska, H., J. L. Brenguier, and G. Salut, 1997: Optimal nonlinear estimation for cloud particle measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,14, 88–104.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Wendisch, M., A. Keil, and A. V. Korolev, 1996: FSSP characterization with monodisperse water droplets. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,13, 1152–1165.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 440 113 14
PDF Downloads 266 73 15