Assessment of the Cycle-to-Cycle Noise Level of the Geosat Follow-On, TOPEX, and Poseidon Altimeters

N. Tran Raytheon ITSS and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia

Search for other papers by N. Tran in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. W. Hancock III NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia

Search for other papers by D. W. Hancock III in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G. S. Hayne NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops Island, Virginia

Search for other papers by G. S. Hayne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. W. Lockwood Raytheon ITSS and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops, Virginia

Search for other papers by D. W. Lockwood in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
D. Vandemark NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/Wallops Flight Facility, Wallops, Virginia

Search for other papers by D. Vandemark in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. L. Driscoll TASC, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by M. L. Driscoll in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R. V. Sailor TASC, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by R. V. Sailor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The Geodetic Satellite (Geosat) Follow-On (GFO), Ocean Topography Experiment (TOPEX), and Poseidon altimeter white-noise levels have been evaluated using a technique based on high-pass filtering of 1-Hz sea surface height time series. High-pass filtering removes the geoid and oceanography signals while revealing the random noise. This filtering technique is simpler to use than the repeat-track method, gives essentially the same results, and makes it easier to analyze much larger amounts of data to investigate subtle variations in noise levels. The new noise-level measurements provided here all show stable noise-process characteristics from cycle to cycle, with a linear dependence of the noise level upon significant wave height (SWH). The GFO altimeter noise level is estimated to be 2.5 cm for an SWH of 2 m. The Poseidon noise level is estimated at 2.0 cm for the same value of 2 m SWH. The TOPEX altimeter noise level is 1.8 cm when the dual-frequency ionospheric correction is included; when this noisy correction is not used, the level is reduced to 1.5 cm. Although the dual-frequency ionospheric correction provides an average improvement over the “Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite” (DORIS) correction, high-frequency noise enters into the dual-frequency correction via noise from the Ku- and C-band ranges. Because the variations in ionospheric refraction are a relatively long wavelength global effect (with strong dependence on latitude), the dual-frequency ionospheric correction should be low-pass filtered before use, and this correction should not be included when estimating the high-frequency noise level of the altimeter.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ngan Tran, CLS/Space Oceanography Division, 8-10 rue Hermes, 31526 Ramonville St-Agne, France. Email: tran@cls.fr

Abstract

The Geodetic Satellite (Geosat) Follow-On (GFO), Ocean Topography Experiment (TOPEX), and Poseidon altimeter white-noise levels have been evaluated using a technique based on high-pass filtering of 1-Hz sea surface height time series. High-pass filtering removes the geoid and oceanography signals while revealing the random noise. This filtering technique is simpler to use than the repeat-track method, gives essentially the same results, and makes it easier to analyze much larger amounts of data to investigate subtle variations in noise levels. The new noise-level measurements provided here all show stable noise-process characteristics from cycle to cycle, with a linear dependence of the noise level upon significant wave height (SWH). The GFO altimeter noise level is estimated to be 2.5 cm for an SWH of 2 m. The Poseidon noise level is estimated at 2.0 cm for the same value of 2 m SWH. The TOPEX altimeter noise level is 1.8 cm when the dual-frequency ionospheric correction is included; when this noisy correction is not used, the level is reduced to 1.5 cm. Although the dual-frequency ionospheric correction provides an average improvement over the “Doppler orbitography and radiopositioning integrated by satellite” (DORIS) correction, high-frequency noise enters into the dual-frequency correction via noise from the Ku- and C-band ranges. Because the variations in ionospheric refraction are a relatively long wavelength global effect (with strong dependence on latitude), the dual-frequency ionospheric correction should be low-pass filtered before use, and this correction should not be included when estimating the high-frequency noise level of the altimeter.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Ngan Tran, CLS/Space Oceanography Division, 8-10 rue Hermes, 31526 Ramonville St-Agne, France. Email: tran@cls.fr

Save
  • Brammer, R. F., and Sailor R. V. , 1980: Preliminary estimates of the resolution capability of the Seasat radar altimeter. Geophys. Res. Lett., 7 , 193196.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Callahan, P. S., 1984: Ionospheric variations affecting altimeter measurement: A brief synopsis. Mar. Geod., 8 , 249263.

  • Callahan, P. S., 1992: TOPEX/POSEIDON Project GDR user's handbook. Rep. D-8944, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 84 pp.

  • Chelton, D. B., Ries J. C. , Haines B. J. , Fu L-L. , and Callahan P. S. , 2001: Satellite altimetry. Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences: A handbook of Techniques and Applications, L.-L. Fu and A. Cazenave, Eds., Academic Press, 463 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Driscoll, M. L., and Sailor R. V. , 2001: GFO on-orbit altimeter noise assessment. NASA Tech. Memo. 2001-209984/Vol. 2 Rep. 21 pp. [Available online at http://gfo.wff.nasa.gov/docs.html.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fu, L-L., Christensen E. J. , Yamarone C. A. Jr.,, Lefebvre M. , Ménard Y. , Dorrer M. , and Escudier P. , 1994: TOPEX/POSEIDON mission overview. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2436924381.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaspar, P., Ogor F. , Le Traon P. Y. , and Zanife O-Z. , 1994: Estimating the sea state bias of the TOPEX and POSEIDON altimeters from crossover differences. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2498124994.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Imel, D. A., 1994: Evaluation of the TOPEX/POSEIDON dual-frequency ionosphere correction. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2489524906.

  • LeSchack, A. R., and Sailor R. V. , 1988: A preliminary model for Geosat altimeter data errors. Geophys. Res. Lett., 15 , 12031206.

  • Le Traon, P. Y., Stum J. , Dorandeu J. , and Gaspar P. , 1994: Global statistical analysis of TOPEX and Poseidon data. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2461924631.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Marth, P. C., and Coauthors. 1993: Prelaunch performance of the NASA altimeter for the TOPEX/POSEIDON project. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 31 , 315332.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Morris, C. S., and Gill S. K. , 1994: Evaluation of the TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter system over the Great Lakes. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2452724539.

  • Quartly, G. D., Srokosz M. A. , and McMillan A. C. , 2001: Analyzing altimeter artifacts: Statistical properties of ocean waveforms. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18 , 20742091.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sailor, R. V., 1993: Signal processing techniques. Geoid and its Geophysical Interpretation, P. Vanicek and N. Christou, Eds., CRC Press, 147–185.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sailor, R. V., and LeSchack A. R. , 1987: Preliminary determination of the Geosat radar altimeter noise spectrum. Johns Hopkins APL Tech. Digest, 8 , 182183.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sailor, R. V., and Driscoll M. L. , 1992: Comparison of noise models and resolution capabilities for satellite radar altimeters. Proc. Oceans 92 Conf., Newport, RI, IEEE, 249–253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stammer, D., and Wunsch C. , 1994: Preliminary assessment of the accuracy and precision of TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data with respect to the large-scale ocean circulation. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2458424604.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Walsh, E. J., 1982: Pulse to pulse correlation in satellite radar altimeters. Radio Sci., 17 , 786800.

  • Zlotnicki, V., 1994: Correlated environmental corrections in TOPEX/POSEIDON, with a note on ionospheric accuracy. J. Geophys. Res., 99 (C12) 2490724914.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 449 198 11
PDF Downloads 109 31 5