A Portable Eddy Covariance System for the Measurement of Ecosystem–Atmosphere Exchange of CO2, Water Vapor, and Energy

D. P. Billesbach Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Search for other papers by D. P. Billesbach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. L. Fischer Environmental Energy Technologies Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by M. L. Fischer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M. S. Torn Center for Isotope Geochemistry, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by M. S. Torn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. A. Berry Department of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Stanford, California

Search for other papers by J. A. Berry in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

To facilitate the study of flux heterogeneity within a region, the authors have designed and field-tested a portable eddy covariance system to measure exchange of CO2, water vapor, and energy between the land surface and the atmosphere. The combination of instrumentation used in this system allows high precision flux measurements without requiring on-site infrastructure such as prepositioned towers or line power. In addition, the system contains sensors to measure a suit of soil, climatic, and energy-related parameters that are needed to quality control the fluxes and to characterize the flux footprint. The physical design and instrument packaging used in the system allows for simple transport (fits in a standard minivan) and for rapid deployment with a minimal number of field personnel (usually less than a day for one person). The power requirement for the entire system (instruments and data loggers) is less than 35 W, which is provided by a companion solar power system.

Side-by-side field comparisons between this system and two permanent AmeriFlux sites and between the roving AmeriFlux intercomparison system are described here. Results of these comparisons indicate that the portable system is capable of absolute flux resolutions of about ±1.2 μmol m−2 s−1 for CO2, ±15 W m−2 for LE, ±7 W m−2 for H, and ±0.06 m s−1 for u* between any given 30-min averaging periods. It is also found that, compared to a permanent Ameriflux site, the relative accuracy of this flux estimates is between 1% and 7%. Based on these results, it is concluded that this portable system is capable of making ecosystem flux measurements with an accuracy and precision comparable to most permanent AmeriFlux systems.

Corresponding author address: Dr. D. P. Billesbach, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726. Email: dbillesbach1@unl.edu

Abstract

To facilitate the study of flux heterogeneity within a region, the authors have designed and field-tested a portable eddy covariance system to measure exchange of CO2, water vapor, and energy between the land surface and the atmosphere. The combination of instrumentation used in this system allows high precision flux measurements without requiring on-site infrastructure such as prepositioned towers or line power. In addition, the system contains sensors to measure a suit of soil, climatic, and energy-related parameters that are needed to quality control the fluxes and to characterize the flux footprint. The physical design and instrument packaging used in the system allows for simple transport (fits in a standard minivan) and for rapid deployment with a minimal number of field personnel (usually less than a day for one person). The power requirement for the entire system (instruments and data loggers) is less than 35 W, which is provided by a companion solar power system.

Side-by-side field comparisons between this system and two permanent AmeriFlux sites and between the roving AmeriFlux intercomparison system are described here. Results of these comparisons indicate that the portable system is capable of absolute flux resolutions of about ±1.2 μmol m−2 s−1 for CO2, ±15 W m−2 for LE, ±7 W m−2 for H, and ±0.06 m s−1 for u* between any given 30-min averaging periods. It is also found that, compared to a permanent Ameriflux site, the relative accuracy of this flux estimates is between 1% and 7%. Based on these results, it is concluded that this portable system is capable of making ecosystem flux measurements with an accuracy and precision comparable to most permanent AmeriFlux systems.

Corresponding author address: Dr. D. P. Billesbach, Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726. Email: dbillesbach1@unl.edu

Save
  • Auble, D. L., and Meyers T. P. , 1992: An open-path, fast response infrared absorption gas analyzer for H2O and CO2. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 59 , 243256.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bremer, D. J., and Ham J. M. , 2002: Measurement and modeling of soil CO2 flux in a temperate grassland under mowed and burned regimes. Ecol. Appl, 12 , 13181328.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chahuneau, F., Desjardins R. L. , Branch E. , and Verdon R. , 1989: A micrometeorological facility for eddy flux measurements of CO2 and H2O. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 6 , 193200.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Eugster, W., McFadden J. P. , and Chapin F. S. , 1997: A comparative approach to regional variation in surface fluxes using mobile eddy correlation towers. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 85 , 293307.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Evans, R., cited 2000: AmeriFlux Relocatable System: A relocatable eddy covariance carbon flux and meteorological measurement system. [Available online at http://public.ornl.gov/ameriflux/ Standards/roving-system/roving_update_12-26-2000.cfm.&rsqb.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kristensen, L., Mann J. , Oncley S. P. , and Wyngaard J. C. , 1997: How close is close enough when measuring scalar fluxes with displaced sensors? J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 14 , 814821.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Meyers, T. P., 2001: A comparison of summertime water and CO2 fluxes over rangeland for well watered and drought conditions. Agric. For. Meteor, 106 , 205214.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Moore, C. J., 1986: Frequency response corrections for eddy correlation systems. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 37 , 1735.

  • Paw, U,K. T., Baldocchi D. D. , Meyers T. P. , and Wilson K. B. , 2000: Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 97 , 487511.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rannik, U., and Vesala T. , 1999: Autoregressive filtering versus linear detrending in estimation of fluxes by the eddy covariance method. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 91 , 259280.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schotanus, P., Nieuwstadt F. T. M. , and De Bruin H. A. R. , 1983: Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes. Bound.-Layer Meteor, 26 , 8193.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weast, R. C., 1974: Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, 2225 pp.

  • Webb, E. K., Pearman G. I. , and Leuning R. , 1980: Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc, 106 , 85100.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilson, K., and Coauthors, 2002: Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites. Agric. For. Meteor, 113 , 223243.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1105 408 175
PDF Downloads 482 63 7