Monitoring the Reflectivity Calibration of a Scanning Radar Using a Profiling Radar and a Disdrometer

Christopher R. Williams Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, and NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Christopher R. Williams in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kenneth S. Gage NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Kenneth S. Gage in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Wallace Clark Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, and NOAA/Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Wallace Clark in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Paul Kucera Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota

Search for other papers by Paul Kucera in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper describes a method of absolutely calibrating and routinely monitoring the reflectivity calibration from a scanning weather radar using a vertically profiling radar that has been absolutely calibrated using a collocated surface disdrometer. The three instruments have different temporal and spatial resolutions, and the concept of upscaling is used to relate the small resolution volume disdrometer observations with the large resolution volume scanning radar observations. This study uses observations collected from a surface disdrometer, two profiling radars, and the National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scanning weather radar during the Texas–Florida Underflight-phase B (TEFLUN-B) ground validation field campaign held in central Florida during August and September 1998.

The statistics from the 2062 matched profiling and scanning radar observations during this 2-month period indicate that the WSR-88D radar had a reflectivity 0.7 dBZ higher than the disdrometer-calibrated profiler, the standard deviation was 2.4 dBZ, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.1 dBZ. This study implies that although there is large variability between individual matched observations, the precision of a series of observations is good, allowing meaningful comparisons useful for calibration and monitoring.

Corresponding author address: Christopher R. Williams, CIRES–NOAA/Aeronomy Lab, Mail Stop R/AL 3, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305. Email: Christopher.R.Williams@noaa.gov

Abstract

This paper describes a method of absolutely calibrating and routinely monitoring the reflectivity calibration from a scanning weather radar using a vertically profiling radar that has been absolutely calibrated using a collocated surface disdrometer. The three instruments have different temporal and spatial resolutions, and the concept of upscaling is used to relate the small resolution volume disdrometer observations with the large resolution volume scanning radar observations. This study uses observations collected from a surface disdrometer, two profiling radars, and the National Weather Service (NWS) Weather Surveillance Radar-1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) scanning weather radar during the Texas–Florida Underflight-phase B (TEFLUN-B) ground validation field campaign held in central Florida during August and September 1998.

The statistics from the 2062 matched profiling and scanning radar observations during this 2-month period indicate that the WSR-88D radar had a reflectivity 0.7 dBZ higher than the disdrometer-calibrated profiler, the standard deviation was 2.4 dBZ, and the 95% confidence interval was 0.1 dBZ. This study implies that although there is large variability between individual matched observations, the precision of a series of observations is good, allowing meaningful comparisons useful for calibration and monitoring.

Corresponding author address: Christopher R. Williams, CIRES–NOAA/Aeronomy Lab, Mail Stop R/AL 3, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO 80305. Email: Christopher.R.Williams@noaa.gov

Save
  • Anagnostou, E N., and Krajewski W F. , 1998: Calibration of the WSR-88D precipitation processing subsystem. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 396406.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anagnostou, E N., and Krajewski W F. , 1999a: Real-time radar rainfall estimation. Part I: Algorithm formulation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 189197.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anagnostou, E N., and Krajewski W F. , 1999b: Real-time radar rainfall estimation. Part II: Case study. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 198205.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anagnostou, E N., Krajewski W F. , and Smith J. , 1999: Uncertainty quantification of mean-areal radar-rainfall estimates. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 206215.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Anagnostou, E N., Morales C A. , and Dinku T. , 2001: The use of TRMM precipitation radar observations in determining ground radar calibration biases. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18 , 616628.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Atlas, D., 2002: Radar calibration: Some simple approaches. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83 , 13131316.

  • Atlas, D., Willis P. , and Marks F. , 1995: The effects of convective updrafts and downdrafts on reflectivity–rain rate relations and water budgets. Preprints, 27th Conf. on Radar Meteorology, Vail, CO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 19–22.

  • Austin, P M., 1987: Relation between measured radar reflectivity and surface rainfall. Mon. Wea. Rev., 115 , 10531070.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baeck, M L., and Smith J A. , 1998: Rainfall estimation by the WSR-88D for heavy rainfall events. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 416436.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baer, V E., 1991: The transition from the present radar dissemination system to the NEXRAD Information Dissemination Service (NIDS). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 72 , 2933.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bolen, S M., and Chandrasekar V. , 2000: Quantitative cross validation of space-based and ground-based radar observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 20712079.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandes, E A., Vivekanandan J. , and Wilson J W. , 1999: A comparison of radar reflectivity estimates of rainfall from collocated radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 12641272.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brandes, E A., Zhang G. , and Vivekanandan J. , 2002: Experiments in rainfall estimation with a polarimetric radar in a subtropical environment. J. Appl. Meteor., 41 , 674685.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bringi, V N., and Chandrasekar V. , 2001: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar. Cambridge University Press, 636 pp.

  • Crum, T D., and Alberty R L. , 1993: The WSR-88D and the WSR-88D operational support facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74 , 16691688.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crum, T D., Alberty R L. , and Burgess D W. , 1993: Recording, archiving, and using WSR-88D data. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 74 , 645653.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crum, T D., Saffle R E. , and Wilson J W. , 1998: An update on the NEXRAD program and future WSR-88D support to operations. Wea. Forecasting, 13 , 253262.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fabry, F., 1996: On the determination of scale ranges for precipitation fields. J. Geophys. Res., 101 , 1281912826.

  • Gage, K S., Williams C R. , Johnston P E. , Ecklund W L. , Cifelli R. , Tokay A. , and Carter D A. , 2000: Doppler radar profilers as calibration tools for scanning radars. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 22092222.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gage, K S., Clark W L. , Williams C R. , and Tokay A. , 2004: Determining reflectivity measurement error from serial measurements using paired disdrometers and profilers. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 .L23107, doi:10.1029/2004GL020591.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Glitto, P., and Choy B. , 1997: A comparison of WSR-88D storm total precipitation performance during two tropical systems following changes to the multiplicative bias and upper reflectivity threshold. Wea. Forecasting, 12 , 459471.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heiss, W H., McGrew D L. , and Sirmans D. , 1990: NEXRAD: Next Generation Weather Radar (WSR-88D). Microwave J., 33 , 7998.

  • Houze R A. Jr, , 1993: Cloud Dynamics. Academic Press, 573 pp.

  • Joss, J., and Waldvogel A. , 1969: Raindrop size distribution and sampling. J. Atmos. Sci., 26 , 566569.

  • Martner, B E., 1977: A field experiment on the calibration of radars with raindrop disdrometers. J. Appl. Meteor., 16 , 451454.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • May, P T., Jameson A R. , Keenan T D. , and Johnston P E. , 2001: A comparison between polarimetric radar and wind profiler observations of precipitation in tropical showers. J. Appl. Meteor., 40 , 17021717.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • May, P T., Jameson A R. , Keenan T D. , Johnston P E. , and Lucas C. , 2002: Combined wind profiler/polarimetric radar studies of the vertical motion and microphysical characteristics of tropical sea-breeze thunderstorms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 130 , 22282239.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ralph, F M., 1995: Using radar-measured radial vertical velocities to distinguish precipitation scattering from clear-air scattering. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12 , 257267.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Serafin, R J., and Wilson J W. , 2000: Operational weather radar in the United States: Progress and opportunity. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81 , 501518.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sheppard, B E., and Joe P I. , 1994: Comparison of raindrop size distribution measurements by a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer, a PMS 2DG spectrometer, and a POSS Doppler radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11 , 874887.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, J A., Seo D-J. , Baeck M L. , and Hudlow M D. , 1996: An intercomparison study of NEXRAD precipitation estimates. Water Resour. Res., 32 , 20352045.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith, P L., Liu Z. , and Joss J. , 1993: A study of sampling-variability effects in raindrop size observations. J. Appl. Meteor., 32 , 12591269.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Srivastava, R C., 1987: A model of intense downdrafts driven by the melting and evaporation of precipitation. J. Atmos. Sci., 44 , 17521773.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stellman, K M., Fuelberg H E. , Garza R. , and Mullusky M. , 2001: An examination of radar and rain gauge–derived mean areal precipitation over Georgia watersheds. Wea. Forecasting, 16 , 133144.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ulbrich, C W., and Lee L G. , 1999: Rainfall measurement error by WSR-88D radars due to variations in ZR law parameters and the radar constant. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 10171024.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ulbrich, C W., and Miller N E. , 2001: Experimental test of the effects of ZR law variations on comparison of WSR-88D rainfall amounts with surface rain gauge and disdrometer data. Wea. Forecasting, 16 , 369375.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, C R., Ecklund W L. , Johnston P E. , and Gage K S. , 2000: Cluster analysis techniques to separate air motion and hydrometeors in vertical incident profiler observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17 , 949962.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 188 57 6
PDF Downloads 233 33 1