Image Navigation for the FY2 Geosynchronous Meteorological Satellite

Feng Lu Department of Atmospheric Science, School of Physics, Peking University, and National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

Search for other papers by Feng Lu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Xiaohu Zhang National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

Search for other papers by Xiaohu Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jianmin Xu National Satellite Meteorological Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, China

Search for other papers by Jianmin Xu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An automatic image navigation algorithm for Feng Yun 2 (FY2) spin-stabilized geosynchronous meteorological satellites was determined at the National Satellite Meteorological Center (NSMC) of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). This paper derives the parameters and coordinate systems used in FY2 image navigation, with an emphasis on attitude and misalignment parameters. The solution to the navigation model does not depend on any landmark matching.

The time series dataset of the satellite orientation with respect to the center line of the earth’s disk contains information on the two components of the attitude (orientation of the satellite spin axis) and the roll component of the misalignment. With this information, the two attitude components can be solved simultaneously, expressed as declination and right ascension (with diurnal variation in the fixed earth coordinate system) and the roll component of the misalignment (with no diurnal variation).

In each spin cycle, the satellite views the sun and earth. The position of the sun is detected and used to align earth observation pixels in the scan line together with an angle subtended at the satellite by the sun and earth (β). With satellite position and attitude known, the β angle can be calculated and predicted with sufficient accuracy. Next, the image is assembled. Prediction of the β angle takes an important role in the image formation process, as imperfect β angle prediction may cause east–west shift and image deformation. In the image registration process of FY2, both the east–west shift and the image deformation are compensated for.

The above-mentioned solution to the navigation model requires accurate knowledge of astronomical parameters and coordinate systems. The orbital, attitude, misalignment, and β angle parameters are produced automatically and routinely without any manual operation. Image navigation accuracy for the FY2 geosynchronous meteorological satellite approaches 5 km at the subsatellite point (SSP).

Corresponding author address: Jianmin Xu, No. 46, Zhong Guan Cun South Street, Beijing 100081, China. Email: xujm@cma.gov.cn

Abstract

An automatic image navigation algorithm for Feng Yun 2 (FY2) spin-stabilized geosynchronous meteorological satellites was determined at the National Satellite Meteorological Center (NSMC) of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). This paper derives the parameters and coordinate systems used in FY2 image navigation, with an emphasis on attitude and misalignment parameters. The solution to the navigation model does not depend on any landmark matching.

The time series dataset of the satellite orientation with respect to the center line of the earth’s disk contains information on the two components of the attitude (orientation of the satellite spin axis) and the roll component of the misalignment. With this information, the two attitude components can be solved simultaneously, expressed as declination and right ascension (with diurnal variation in the fixed earth coordinate system) and the roll component of the misalignment (with no diurnal variation).

In each spin cycle, the satellite views the sun and earth. The position of the sun is detected and used to align earth observation pixels in the scan line together with an angle subtended at the satellite by the sun and earth (β). With satellite position and attitude known, the β angle can be calculated and predicted with sufficient accuracy. Next, the image is assembled. Prediction of the β angle takes an important role in the image formation process, as imperfect β angle prediction may cause east–west shift and image deformation. In the image registration process of FY2, both the east–west shift and the image deformation are compensated for.

The above-mentioned solution to the navigation model requires accurate knowledge of astronomical parameters and coordinate systems. The orbital, attitude, misalignment, and β angle parameters are produced automatically and routinely without any manual operation. Image navigation accuracy for the FY2 geosynchronous meteorological satellite approaches 5 km at the subsatellite point (SSP).

Corresponding author address: Jianmin Xu, No. 46, Zhong Guan Cun South Street, Beijing 100081, China. Email: xujm@cma.gov.cn

Save
  • Adamson, J., Kerr G. W. , and Jacobs G. H. P. , 1988: Rectification quality assessment of Meteosat images. ESA J., 12 , 467482.

  • Agrotis, L. G., 1988: Near-earth satellite orbit determination and its applications. ESA J., 12 , 441453.

  • Bos, A. M., de Waard J. , and Adamson J. , 1990: Real-time rectification of Meteosat images. ESA J., 14 , 179191.

  • Bristor, C. L., 1975: Central processing and analysis of geostationary satellite data. NOAA Tech. Memo. NESS 64, 155 pp.

  • Doolittle, R. C., Bristor C. L. , and Lauritson L. , 1973: Mapping of geostationary satellite pictures—An operational experiment. ESSA Tech. Memo. NESCTM-20, National Environmental Satellite Service, 19 pp.

  • Fan, S., Liu J. , Qian L. , and Zhong F. , 1998: Visible and infrared spin scanning radiometer data processing method (in Chinese). Chin. Space Sci. Technol., 18 , 3. 1730.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hambrick, L. N., and Phillips D. R. , 1980: Earth locating image data of spin-stabilized geosynchronous satellites. NOAA Tech. Memo. NESS 111, 105 pp.

  • Harris, W. T., Bangert J. A. , and Kaplan G. H. , cited. 1996: NOVAS-C Naval Observatory astrometry subroutines, C version 1.0. [Latest version available online at http://aa.usno.navy.mil/software/novas/novas_c/novasc_info.php.].

  • Kamel, A. A., 1996: GOES image navigation and registration. GOES-8 and Beyond, E. R. Washwell, Ed., International Society for Optical Engineering (SPIE Proceedings, Vol. 2812), 766–776.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kigawa, S., 1991: A mapping method for VISSR data. Meteorological Satellite Center Tech. Note 23, 35 pp.

  • Montenbruck, O., and Gill E. , 2000: Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods, and Applications. Springer, 369 pp.

  • National Satellite Meteorological Center, 2004: FY2 C/D/E SVISSR 2.0 Format. NSMC internal document, 29 pp.

  • National Satellite Meteorological Center, 2006: Current status of the FY2C geostationary satellite. CGMS 34 CMA-WP-03, 7 pp.

  • Sørensen, A. M., 1997: Meteosat long-term spin axis drift and manoeuvre optimization. Proc. 12th Int. Symp. on Space Flight Dynamics, ESA SP-403, Darmstadt, Germany, European Space Agency, 215–220.

  • Space Science and Engineering Center, 1986: McIDAS navigational manual. University of Wisconsin—Madison, 46 pp.

  • Whitney M. B. Jr., , Doolittle R. C. , and Goddard B. , 1968: Processing and display experiments using digitized ATS-1 spin scan camera data. NESC-44, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Environmental Satellite Center, 60 pp.

  • Wolff, T., 1985: An image geometry model for Meteosat. Int. J. Remote Sens., 6 , 467482.

  • Xu, J., Lu F. , and Zhang Q. , 2002: Automatic navigation of FY-2 geosynchronous meteorological satellite images. Proc. Sixth Int. Winds Workshop, Madison, WI, EUMETSAT, 291–295.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1304 702 78
PDF Downloads 292 62 8