Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Detection of Fog and Low Cloud Boundaries with Ground-Based Remote Sensing Systems

Daniela Nowak Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Daniela Nowak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Dominique Ruffieux Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Dominique Ruffieux in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Judith L. Agnew STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Judith L. Agnew in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
Laurent Vuilleumier Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Laurent Vuilleumier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 2008
Collections:
Fifth International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling (ISTP)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA950.1
Page(s):
1357–1368
Restricted access

Abstract

The performance of the boundary determination of fog and low stratiform cloud layers with data from a frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) cloud radar and a Vaisala ceilometer is assessed. During wintertime stable episodes, fog and low stratiform cloud layers often occur in the Swiss Plateau, where the aerological station of Payerne, Switzerland, is located. During the international COST 720 Temperature, Humidity, and Cloud (TUC) profiling experiment in winter 2003/04, both a cloud radar and a ceilometer were operated in parallel, among other profiling instruments. Human eye observations (“synops”) and temperature and humidity profiles from radiosoundings were used as reference for the validation. In addition, two case studies were chosen to demonstrate the possibilities and limitations of such ground-based remote sensing systems in determining low clouds. In these case studies the cloud boundaries determined by ceilometer and cloud radar were furthermore compared with wind profiler signal-to-noise ratio time series. Under dry conditions, cloud-base and -top detection was possible in 59% and 69% of the cases for low stratus clouds and fog situations, respectively. When cases with any form of precipitation were included, performances were reduced with detection rates of 41% and 63%, respectively. The combination of ceilometer and cloud radar has the potential for providing the base and top of a cloud layer with optimal efficiency in the continuous operational mode. The cloud-top height determination by the cloud radar was compared with cloud-top heights detected using radiosounding humidity profiles. The average height difference between the radiosounding and cloud radar determination of the cloud upper boundary is 53 ± 32 m.

Corresponding author address: Daniela Nowak, Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Les Invuardes, CH-1530 Payerne, Switzerland. Email: daniela.nowak@meteoswiss.ch

This article included in the Fifth International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling (ISTP) special collection.

Abstract

The performance of the boundary determination of fog and low stratiform cloud layers with data from a frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) cloud radar and a Vaisala ceilometer is assessed. During wintertime stable episodes, fog and low stratiform cloud layers often occur in the Swiss Plateau, where the aerological station of Payerne, Switzerland, is located. During the international COST 720 Temperature, Humidity, and Cloud (TUC) profiling experiment in winter 2003/04, both a cloud radar and a ceilometer were operated in parallel, among other profiling instruments. Human eye observations (“synops”) and temperature and humidity profiles from radiosoundings were used as reference for the validation. In addition, two case studies were chosen to demonstrate the possibilities and limitations of such ground-based remote sensing systems in determining low clouds. In these case studies the cloud boundaries determined by ceilometer and cloud radar were furthermore compared with wind profiler signal-to-noise ratio time series. Under dry conditions, cloud-base and -top detection was possible in 59% and 69% of the cases for low stratus clouds and fog situations, respectively. When cases with any form of precipitation were included, performances were reduced with detection rates of 41% and 63%, respectively. The combination of ceilometer and cloud radar has the potential for providing the base and top of a cloud layer with optimal efficiency in the continuous operational mode. The cloud-top height determination by the cloud radar was compared with cloud-top heights detected using radiosounding humidity profiles. The average height difference between the radiosounding and cloud radar determination of the cloud upper boundary is 53 ± 32 m.

Corresponding author address: Daniela Nowak, Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Les Invuardes, CH-1530 Payerne, Switzerland. Email: daniela.nowak@meteoswiss.ch

This article included in the Fifth International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling (ISTP) special collection.

Save
Cover Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

  • Aviolat, F., Cornu T. , and Cattani D. , 1998: Automatic clouds observation improved by an artificial neural network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15 , 114–126.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Bendix, J., Thies B. , Cermak J. , and Nauss T. , 2005: Ground fog detection from space based on MODIS daytime data—A feasibility study. Wea. Forecasting, 20 , 989–1005.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Boers, R., Russchenberg H. , Erkelens J. , and Venema V. , 2000: Ground-based remote sensing of stratocumulus properties during CLARA, 1996. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 169–181.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Cermak, J., Schneebeli M. , Nowak D. , Vuilleumier L. , and Bendix J. , 2006: Characterization of low clouds with satellite and ground-based remote sensing systems. Meteor. Z., 15 , 65–72.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Clothiaux, E. E., Ackerman T. P. , Mace G. C. , Moran K. P. , Marchand R. T. , Miller M. A. , and Martner B. E. , 2000: Objective determination of cloud heights and radar reflectivities using a combination of active remote sensors at the ARM CART sites. J. Appl. Meteor., 39 , 645–665.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Crewell, S., and Coauthors, 2004: The Baltex Bridge Campaign: An integrated approach for a better understanding of clouds. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 85 , 1565–1584.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Dibbern, J., Monna W. , Nash J. , and Peters G. , Eds. 2003: COST Action 76: Development of VHF/UHF wind profilers and vertical sounders for use in European observing systems. Final Rep. EUR 20614, European Commission, 352 pp.

  • Dürr, B., and Philipona R. , 2004: Automatic cloud amount detection by surface longwave downward radiation measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 109 .D05201, doi:10.1029/2003JD004182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Engelbart, D. A. M., Monna W. , Nash J. , and Maetzler C. , Eds. 2007: COST Action 720: Integrated ground-based remote sensing stations for atmospheric profiling. COST Office, Brussels, Belgium, Final Rep., in press.

  • Gossard, E. E., Chadwick R. B. , Neff W. D. , and Moran K. P. , 1982: The use of ground-based Doppler radars to measure gradients, fluxes, and structure parameters in elevated layers. J. Appl. Meteor., 21 , 211–226.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Gossard, E. E., Wolfe D. E. , and Stankov B. B. , 1999: Measurement of humidity profiles in the atmosphere by the Global Positioning System and radar wind profilers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16 , 156–164.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Hollars, S., Fu Q. , Comstock J. , and Ackerman T. , 2004: Comparison of cloud-top height retrievals from ground-based 35GHz MMCR and GMS-5 satellite observations at ARM TWP Manus site. Atmos. Res., 72 , 169–186.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Illingworth, A. J., and Coauthors, 2007: CLOUDNET—Continuous evaluation of cloud profiles in seven operational models using ground-based observations. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 88 , 883–898.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Kollias, P., Fairall C. W. , Zuidema P. , Tomlinson J. , and Wick G. A. , 2004: Observation of marine stratocumulus in SE Pacific during the PACS 2003 cruise. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 .L22110, doi:10.1029/2004GL020751.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Löhnert, U., Crewell S. , and Simmer C. , 2004: An integrated approach toward retrieving physically consistent profiles of temperature, humidity, and cloud liquid water. J. Appl. Meteor., 43 , 1295–1307.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Miloshevic, L. M., Voemel H. , Whiteman D. N. , Lesht B. M. , Schmidlin F. J. , and Russo F. , 2006: Absolute accuracy of water vapor measurements from six operational radiosonde types launched during AWEX-G and implications for AIRS validation. J. Geophys. Res., 111 .D09S10, doi:10.1029/2005JD006083.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Müller, G., 1982: Handbuch für Beobachter des automatischen Beobachtungsnetzes. Schweizerische Meteorologische Anstalt, 121 pp.

  • Nash, J., Lyth D. , and Oldfield M. , 2005: Observing fog and low clouds with a combination of 78GHz cloud radar and laser ceilometer. Proc. WMO Instruments and Methods Observation Programme, Tech. Conf. on Meteorological and Environmental Instruments and Methods of Observation, WMO/TD-1265, Bucharest, Romania, WMO, 7 pp. [Available online at http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/www/IMOP/publications/IOM-82-TECO_2005/Posters/P2(11)_UK_3_Nash.pdf.].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Neff, W. D., 1990: Atmospheric Processes over Complex Terrain. Meteor. Monogr., No. 45, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 173–228.

  • O’Connor, E. J., Hogan R. J. , and Illingworth A. J. , 2005: Retrieving stratocumulus drizzle parameters using Doppler radar and lidar. J. Appl. Meteor., 44 , 14–27.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Protat, A., Armstrong A. , Haeffelin M. , Morille Y. , Pelon J. , Delanoë J. , and Burniol D. , 2006: Impact of conditional sampling and instrumental limitations on the statistics of cloud properties derived from cloud radar and lidar at SIRTA. Geophys. Res. Lett., 33 .L11805, doi:10.1029/2005GL025340.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Ramanathan, V., Cess R. D. , Harrison E. F. , Minnis P. , Barkstrom B. R. , Ahmad E. , and Hartmann D. , 1989: Cloud radiative forcing and climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment. Science, 243 , 57–63.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Richner, H., 1999: Grundlagen aerologischer Messungen speziell mittels der Schweizer Sonde SRS 400 (Fundamentals of aerological measurements especially when using the Swiss radiosonde SRS400). Veröffentlichungen der SMA-MeteoSchweiz, No. 61, 140 pp.

  • Ruffieux, D., Nash J. , Jeannet P. , and Agnew J. L. , 2006: The COST 720 temperature, humidity and cloud profiling campaign: TUC. Meteor. Z., 15 , 5–10.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Verver, G., Fujiwara M. , Dolmans P. , Becker C. , Fortuin P. , and Miloshevic L. , 2006: Performance of the Vaisala RS80A/H and RS90 Humicap sensors and the Meteolabor “Snow White” chilled-mirror hygrometer in Paramaribo, Suriname. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23 , 1506–1518.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Wang, J., Rossow W. B. , Uttal T. , and Rozendaal M. , 1999: Variability of cloud vertical structure during ASTEX observed from a combination of rawinsonde, radar, ceilometer, and satellite. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127 , 2484–2502.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 4353 3409 60
PDF Downloads 571 109 9