Coastal Aerosol Profiling with a Camera Lidar and Nephelometer

N. C. Parikh Sharma Department of Physics and Earth Science, Central Connecticut State University, New Britain, Connecticut

Search for other papers by N. C. Parikh Sharma in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John E. Barnes NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory/Mauna Loa Observatory, Hilo, Hawaii

Search for other papers by John E. Barnes in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Trevor B. Kaplan NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory/Mauna Loa Observatory, Hilo, Hawaii

Search for other papers by Trevor B. Kaplan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Antony D. Clarke Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii

Search for other papers by Antony D. Clarke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A bistatic lidar configuration of a wide-angle camera (100°) and vertically pointed laser (532 nm) was used to profile aerosols at a coastal site. Aerosol profiles were measured on two evenings from the surface through the boundary layer. The site, on the eastern tip of the Big Island of Hawaii, is influenced by both marine boundary layer aerosols and breaking waves. Two nephelometers, located at 7 and 25 m above sea level, were compared directly with the 0.5-m-altitude resolution of the camera lidar (clidar). At 7 m, changes in aerosol were tracked quite well by the clidar. At 25 m the aerosol was fairly constant and a useful comparison could only be made with averaged values. The clidar results showed a steep gradient (decreasing with altitude) in the aerosol extinction from 7 to about 35 m. The gradient continued to 200 m at a lower rate. This demonstrated the use of the clidar in characterizing the environment for the in situ aerosol sampling. Both a measured and a NASA Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET)-derived aerosol phase function, representing similar marine conditions but from different locations, were used to convert the single-angle clidar scatter to extinction. The measured function gave the best fit to the near-surface nephelometer data. The extinction/backscatter ratio, derived by comparing the NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth to the integrated clidar profile, was higher than the long-term average value from the AERONET aerosol phase function.

Corresponding author address: Dr. N. C. Parikh Sharma, Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050. Email: sharmanim@ccsu.edu

Abstract

A bistatic lidar configuration of a wide-angle camera (100°) and vertically pointed laser (532 nm) was used to profile aerosols at a coastal site. Aerosol profiles were measured on two evenings from the surface through the boundary layer. The site, on the eastern tip of the Big Island of Hawaii, is influenced by both marine boundary layer aerosols and breaking waves. Two nephelometers, located at 7 and 25 m above sea level, were compared directly with the 0.5-m-altitude resolution of the camera lidar (clidar). At 7 m, changes in aerosol were tracked quite well by the clidar. At 25 m the aerosol was fairly constant and a useful comparison could only be made with averaged values. The clidar results showed a steep gradient (decreasing with altitude) in the aerosol extinction from 7 to about 35 m. The gradient continued to 200 m at a lower rate. This demonstrated the use of the clidar in characterizing the environment for the in situ aerosol sampling. Both a measured and a NASA Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET)-derived aerosol phase function, representing similar marine conditions but from different locations, were used to convert the single-angle clidar scatter to extinction. The measured function gave the best fit to the near-surface nephelometer data. The extinction/backscatter ratio, derived by comparing the NASA Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aerosol optical depth to the integrated clidar profile, was higher than the long-term average value from the AERONET aerosol phase function.

Corresponding author address: Dr. N. C. Parikh Sharma, Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, Central Connecticut State University, 1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050. Email: sharmanim@ccsu.edu

Save
  • Andrews, E., and Coauthors, 2006: Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter. J. Geophys. Res., 111 , D05S04. doi:10.1029/2004JD005734.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, J. E., Bronner S. , Beck R. , and Parikh N. C. , 2003: Boundary layer scattering measurements with a CCD camera lidar. Appl. Opt., 42 , 26472652.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, J. E., Sharma N. C. P. , and Kaplan T. B. , 2007: Atmospheric aerosol profiling with a bistatic imaging lidar system. Appl. Opt., 46 , 29222929.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barnes, W. L., and Salomonson V. V. , 1993: MODIS: A global imaging spectroradiometer for the Earth Observing System. Crit. Rev. Opt. Sci. Technol., CR47 , 285307.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Clarke, A. D., and Kapustin V. N. , 2003: The Shoreline Environment Aerosol Study (SEAS): A context for marine aerosol measurements influenced by a coastal environment and long-range transport. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20 , 13511361.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dubovik, O., and King M. D. , 2000: A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from sun and sky radiance measurements. J. Geophys. Res., 105 , 2067320696.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fernald, F. G., Herman B. M. , and Reagan J. A. , 1972: Determination of aerosol height distributions by lidar. J. Appl. Meteor., 11 , 482489.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heintzenberg, J., and Quenzel H. , 1973: On the effect of the loss of large particles on the determination of scattering coefficients with integrating nephelometers. Atmos. Environ., 7 , 503507.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heintzenberg, J., and Coauthors, 2006: Intercomparisons and aerosol calibrations of 12 commercial integrating nephelometers of three manufacturers. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23 , 902914.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holben, B. N., and Coauthors, 1998: AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization. Remote Sens. Environ., 66 , 116.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koren, I., Remer L. A. , Kaufman Y. J. , Rudich Y. , and Martins J. V. , 2007: On the twilight zone between clouds and aerosols. J. Geophys. Res., 34 , L08805. doi:10.1029/2007GL029253.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lienert, B. R., Porter J. N. , and Sharma S. K. , 2003: Aerosol size distributions from genetic inversion of polar nephelometer data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20 , 14031410.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Masonis, S. J., Anderson T. , Covert D. , Kapustin V. , Clarke A. , Howell S. , and Moore K. , 2003: A study of the extinction-to-backscatter ratio of marine aerosol during the shoreline Environment Aerosol Study. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20 , 13881402.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mueller, D., Ansmann A. , Mattis I. , Tesche M. , Wandinger U. , Althausen D. , and Pisani G. , 2007: Aerosol-type-dependent lidar ratios observed with Raman lidar. J. Geophys. Res., 112 , D16202. doi:10.1029/2006JD008292.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porter, J. N., Cooney T. F. , and Motell C. , 1998: Coastal aerosol phase function measurements with a custom polar nephelometer. Proc. Ocean Optics XIV Conf., Kona, HI, SOEST. [Available online at http://www.soest.hawaii.edu/porter/polar_neph_1.pdf].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Porter, J. N., Lienert B. R. , Sharma S. K. , and Horton K. , 2003: Vertical and horizontal aerosol scatter fields over Bellows Beach, Oahu, during the SEAS experiment. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20 , 13751387.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Remer, L. A., and Coauthors, 2005: The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products, and validation. J. Atmos. Sci., 62 , 947973.

  • Russell, P. B., Swissler T. J. , and McCormick M. P. , 1979: Methodology for error analysis and simulation of lidar aerosol measurements. Appl. Opt., 18 , 37833797.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smirnov, A., Holben B. N. , Kaufman Y. J. , Dubovik O. , Eck T. F. , Slutsker I. , Pietras C. , and Halthore R. N. , 2002: Optical properties of atmospheric aerosol in maritime environments. J. Atmos. Sci., 59 , 501523.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smirnov, A., Holben B. N. , Dubovik O. , Frouin R. , Eck T. F. , and Slutsker I. , 2003: Maritime component in the aerosol optical models derived from aerosol Robotic Network data. J. Geophys. Res., 108 , 4033. doi:10.1029/2002JD002701.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • University of Hawaii, cited. 2009: Coastal wave measuring bouys. Department of Oceanography. [Available online at http://ilikai.soest.hawaii.edu/buoy/].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wen, G., Marshak A. , and Cahalan R. , 2006: Impact of 3-D clouds on clear-sky reflectance and aerosol retrieval in a biomass burning region of Brazil. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 3 , 169172.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 281 139 8
PDF Downloads 138 38 1