Characterizing Soil Physical Properties for Soil Moisture Monitoring with the North Carolina Environment and Climate Observing Network

Weinan Pan Soil Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Weinan Pan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. P. Boyles State Climate Office of North Carolina, and Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by R. P. Boyles in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
J. G. White Soil Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by J. G. White in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J. L. Heitman Soil Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina

Search for other papers by J. L. Heitman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Soil moisture has important implications for meteorology, climatology, hydrology, and agriculture. This has led to growing interest in development of in situ soil moisture monitoring networks. Measurement interpretation is severely limited without soil property data. In North Carolina, soil moisture has been monitored since 1999 as a routine parameter in the statewide Environment and Climate Observing Network (ECONet), but with little soils information available for ECONet sites. The objective of this paper is to provide soils data for ECONet development. The authors studied soil physical properties at 27 ECONet sites and generated a database with 13 soil physical parameters, including sand, silt, and clay contents; bulk density; total porosity; saturated hydraulic conductivity; air-dried water content; and water retention at six pressures. Soil properties were highly variable among individual ECONet sites [coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12% to 80%]. This wide range of properties suggests very different behavior among sites with respect to soil moisture. A principal component analysis indicated parameter groupings associated primarily with soil texture, bulk density, and air-dried water content accounted for 80% of the total variance in the dataset. These results suggested that a few specific soil properties could be measured to provide an understanding of differences in sites with respect to major soil properties. The authors also illustrate how the measured soil properties have been used to develop new soil moisture products and data screening for the North Carolina ECONet. The methods, analysis, and results presented here have applications to North Carolina and for other regions with heterogeneous soils where soil moisture monitoring is valuable.

Current affiliation: University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

Corresponding author address: J. L. Heitman, Campus Box 7619, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. E-mail: jlheitman@ncsu.edu

Abstract

Soil moisture has important implications for meteorology, climatology, hydrology, and agriculture. This has led to growing interest in development of in situ soil moisture monitoring networks. Measurement interpretation is severely limited without soil property data. In North Carolina, soil moisture has been monitored since 1999 as a routine parameter in the statewide Environment and Climate Observing Network (ECONet), but with little soils information available for ECONet sites. The objective of this paper is to provide soils data for ECONet development. The authors studied soil physical properties at 27 ECONet sites and generated a database with 13 soil physical parameters, including sand, silt, and clay contents; bulk density; total porosity; saturated hydraulic conductivity; air-dried water content; and water retention at six pressures. Soil properties were highly variable among individual ECONet sites [coefficients of variation (CVs) ranging from 12% to 80%]. This wide range of properties suggests very different behavior among sites with respect to soil moisture. A principal component analysis indicated parameter groupings associated primarily with soil texture, bulk density, and air-dried water content accounted for 80% of the total variance in the dataset. These results suggested that a few specific soil properties could be measured to provide an understanding of differences in sites with respect to major soil properties. The authors also illustrate how the measured soil properties have been used to develop new soil moisture products and data screening for the North Carolina ECONet. The methods, analysis, and results presented here have applications to North Carolina and for other regions with heterogeneous soils where soil moisture monitoring is valuable.

Current affiliation: University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.

Corresponding author address: J. L. Heitman, Campus Box 7619, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695. E-mail: jlheitman@ncsu.edu
Save
  • Arya, L., Richter J. , and Paris J. , 1983: Estimating profile water storage from surface zone soil moisture measurements under bare field conditions. Water Resour. Res., 19, 403–412.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Basara, J., and Crawford T. , 2000: Improved installation procedures for deep-layered soil moisture measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 879–884.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassel, D. K., 1983: Spatial and temporal variability of soil physical properties following tillage of Norfolk loamy sand. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 47, 196–201.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Coffin, D., and Lauenroth W. , 1992: Spatial variability in seed production of the perennial bunchgrass Bouteloua gracilis (Gramineae). Amer. J. Bot., 79, 347–353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cosby, B., Hornberger G. , Clapp R. , and Ginn T. , 1984: A statistical exploration of the relationships of soil moisture characteristics to the physical properties of soils. Water Resour. Res., 20, 682–690.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cosh, M. H., Jackson T. J. , Bindlish R. , and Prueger J. H. , 2004: 2002 soil moisture experiment (SMEX02): Watershed scale temporal and spatial stability of soil moisture and its role in validating satellite estimates. Remote Sens. Environ., 92, 427–435.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cosh, M. H., Jackson T. J. , Bindlish R. , Familglietti J. S. , and Ryu D. , 2005: Calibration of an impedance probe for estimation of surface soil water content over large regions. J. Hydrol., 311, 49–58.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Drusch, M., Wood E. F. , Gao H. , and Thiele A. , 2004: Soil moisture retrieval during the Southern Great Plains Hydrology Experiment 1999: A comparison between experimental remote sensing data and operational products. Water Resour. Res., 40, 2504.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Engman, E. T., and Chauhan N. , 1995: Status of microwave soil moisture measurements with remote sensing. Remote Sens. Environ., 51, 189–198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Feddes, R. A., Kabat P. , Van Bakel P. J. T. , Browswijk J. J. B. , and Halberstma J. , 1988: Modelling soil water dynamics in the unsaturated zone—State of the art. J. Hydrol., 100, 69–111.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Field, A. P., 2005: Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd ed. Sage, 779 pp.

  • Georgakakos, K. P., and Baumer O. W. , 1996: Measurement and utilization of on-site soil moisture data. J. Hydrol., 184, 131–152.

  • Gupta, S., and Larson W. , 1979: Estimating soil water retention characteristics from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density. Water Resour. Res., 15, 1633–1635.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hillel, D., 2004: Introduction to Environmental Soil Physics. Elsevier Academic Press, 494 pp.

  • Hollinger, S. E., and Isard S. A. , 1994: A soil moisture climatology of Illinois. J. Climate, 7, 822–833.

  • Houser, P. R., Shuttleworth W. J. , Familietti J. S. , Gupta H. V. , Syed K. H. , and Goodrich D. C. , 1998: Integration of soil moisture remote sensing and hydrologic modeling using data assimilation. Water Resour. Res., 34, 3405–3420.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Illston, B., Basara J. , Fiebrich C. , Crawford K. , Hunt E. , Fisher D. , Elliott R. , and Humes K. , 2008: Mesoscale monitoring of soil moisture across a statewide network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 167–182.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jackson, T. J., 1993: Measuring surface soil moisture using passive microwave remote sensing. Hydrol. Processes, 7, 139–152.

  • Jackson, T. J., and Schmugge T. J. , 2002: Passive microwave remote sensing system for soil moisture: Some supporting research. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 27, 225–235.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaiser, E., Mueller T. , Joergensen R. , Insam H. , and Heinemeyer O. , 1992: Evaluation of methods to estimate the soil microbial biomass and the relationship with soil texture and organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24, 675–683.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaleita, A. L., Heitman J. L. , and Logsdon S. D. , 2005: Field calibration of the theta probe for Des Moines lobe soils. Appl. Eng. Agric., 21, 865–870.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klute, A., 1986: Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agron. Monogr., No. 9, Amer. Soc. Agron., 1188 pp.

  • Legates, D. R., Mahmood R. , Levia D. F. , DeLiberty T. L. , Quiring S. M. , Houser C. , and Nelson F. E. , 2011: Soil moisture: A central and unifying theme in physical geography. Prog. Phys. Geogr., 35, 65–86.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Loague, K., 1992: Using soil texture to estimate saturated hydraulic conductivity and the impact on rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resour. Bull., 28, 687–693.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Manrique, L., and Jones C. , 1991: Bulk density of soils in relation to soil physical and chemical properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 55, 476–481.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez-Fernández, J., and Ceballos A. , 2005: Mean soil moisture estimation using temporal stability analysis. J. Hydrol., 312, 28–38.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Njoku, E. G., Jackson T. J. , Lakshmi V. , Chan T. K. , and Nghiem S. V. , 2003: Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 41, 215–229.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NoruÅ¡is, M., 1993: SPSS for Windows: Base System User’s Guide, Release 6.0. Prentice Hall, 828 pp.

  • Pallant, J., 2001: SPSS Survival Manual. A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 10). Buckingham Open University Press, 286 pp.

  • Pan, W., 2010: Soil moisture characterization with North Carolina Environment and Climate Observing Network. M.S. thesis, North Carolina State University Soil Science Department, 126 pp.

  • Rawls, W., Brakensiek D. , and Saxton K. , 1982: Estimation of soil water properties. Trans. ASAE, 25, 1316–1320.

  • Ritchie, J. T., Gerakis A. , and Suleiman A. , 1999: Simple model to estimate field-measured soil water limits. Trans. ASAE, 42, 1609–1614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ritsema, C. J., and Dekker L. W. , 1994: Soil moisture and dry bulk density patterns in bare dune sands. J. Hydrol., 154, 107–131.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robinson, D. A., and Coauthors, 2008: Soil moisture measurements for ecological and hydrological watershed scale observatories: A review. Vadose Zone J., 7, 358–389.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Robock, A., Vinnikov K. Y. , Srinivasan G. , Entin J. K. , Hollinger S. E. , Speranskaya N. A. , Liu S. , and Namkhai A. , 2000: The Global Soil Moisture Data Bank. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 1281–1299.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Vogel G. K. , Rigon R. , Entekhabi D. , Castelli F. , and Rinaldo A. , 1995: On the spatial organization of soil moisture fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 2757–2760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rostagno, C., 1989: Infiltration and sediment production as affected by soil surface conditions in a shrubland of Patagonia, Argentina. J. Range Manage., 42, 382–385.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saxton, K., Rawls W. , Romberger J. , and Papendick R. , 1986: Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 50, 1031.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schaefer, G. L., Cosh M. H. , and Jackson T. J. , 2007: The USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Climate Analysis Network (SCAN). J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 2073–2077.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scott, R. W., Krug E. C. , and Burch S. L. , 2010: Illinois Soil Moisture under Sod Experiment. J. Hydrometeor., 11, 683–704.

  • Seneviratne, S. I., Corti T. , Davin E. L. , Hirschi M. , Jaeger E. B. , Lehner I. , Orlowsky B. , and Teuling A. J. , 2010: Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: A review. Earth Sci. Rev., 99, 125–161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, B. A., and Howell T. A. , 2003: Encyclopedia of Water Science. CPC Press, 1076 pp.

  • Sumner, M. E., and Kamprath E. J. , 2000: Handbook of Soil Science. CRC Press, 2148 pp.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell L. S. , 1996: Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper Collins College Publishers, 880 pp.

  • Vachaud, G., Passerat De Silans A. , Balabanis P. , and Vauclin M. , 1985: Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J., 49, 822–828.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vereecken, H., Huisman J. A. , Bogena H. , Vanderborght J. , Vrugt J. A. , and Hopmans J. W. , 2008: On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review. Water Resour. Res., 44, W00D06, doi:10.1029/2008WR006829.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wagner, W., Lemoine G. , and Rott H. , 1999: A method for estimating soil moisture from ERS scatterometer and soil data. Remote Sens. Environ., 70, 191–207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Western, A. W., and Grayson R. B. , 1998: The Tarrawarra data set: Soil moisture patterns, soil characteristics, and hydrological flux measurements. Water Resour. Res., 34, 2765–2768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Western, A. W., Grayson R. B. , Bloschl G. , Willgoose G. R. , and McMahon T. A. , 1999: Observed spatial organization of soil moisture and its relation to terrain indices. Water Resour. Res., 35, 797–810.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Western, A. W., Grayson R. B. , and Bloschl G. , 2002: Scaling of soil moisture: A hydrologic perspective. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 30, 149–180.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Williams, R., 1970: Relationships between the composition of soils and physical measurements made on them. Rothamsted Experimental Station Rep., Vol. 2, 5–35.

  • Wösten, J. H. M., Pachepsky Y. A. , and Rawls W. J. , 2001: Pedotransfer functions: Bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. J. Hydrol., 251, 123–150.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 3131 1362 51
PDF Downloads 1392 130 7