Improving HF Radar Estimates of Surface Currents Using Signal Quality Metrics, with Application to the MVCO High-Resolution Radar System

Anthony R. Kirincich Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Anthony R. Kirincich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tony de Paolo Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Tony de Paolo in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Eric Terrill Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Eric Terrill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Estimates of surface currents over the continental shelf are now regularly made using high-frequency radar (HFR) systems along much of the U.S. coastline. The recently deployed HFR system at the Martha’s Vineyard Coastal Observatory (MVCO) is a unique addition to these systems, focusing on high spatial resolution over a relatively small coastal ocean domain with high accuracy. However, initial results from the system showed sizable errors and biased estimates of M2 tidal currents, prompting an examination of new methods to improve the quality of radar-based velocity data. The analysis described here utilizes the radial metric output of CODAR Ocean Systems’ version 7 release of the SeaSonde Radial Site Software Suite to examine both the characteristics of the received signal and the output of the direction-finding algorithm to provide data quality controls on the estimated radial currents that are independent of the estimated velocity. Additionally, the effect of weighting spatial averages of radials falling within the same range and azimuthal bin is examined to account for differences in signal quality. Applied to two month-long datasets from the MVCO high-resolution system, these new methods are found to improve the rms difference comparisons with in situ current measurements by up to 2 cm s−1, as well as reduce or eliminate observed biases of tidal ellipses estimated using standard methods.

Corresponding author address: Anthony Kirincich, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543. E-mail: akirincich@whoi.edu

Abstract

Estimates of surface currents over the continental shelf are now regularly made using high-frequency radar (HFR) systems along much of the U.S. coastline. The recently deployed HFR system at the Martha’s Vineyard Coastal Observatory (MVCO) is a unique addition to these systems, focusing on high spatial resolution over a relatively small coastal ocean domain with high accuracy. However, initial results from the system showed sizable errors and biased estimates of M2 tidal currents, prompting an examination of new methods to improve the quality of radar-based velocity data. The analysis described here utilizes the radial metric output of CODAR Ocean Systems’ version 7 release of the SeaSonde Radial Site Software Suite to examine both the characteristics of the received signal and the output of the direction-finding algorithm to provide data quality controls on the estimated radial currents that are independent of the estimated velocity. Additionally, the effect of weighting spatial averages of radials falling within the same range and azimuthal bin is examined to account for differences in signal quality. Applied to two month-long datasets from the MVCO high-resolution system, these new methods are found to improve the rms difference comparisons with in situ current measurements by up to 2 cm s−1, as well as reduce or eliminate observed biases of tidal ellipses estimated using standard methods.

Corresponding author address: Anthony Kirincich, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Woods Hole, MA 02543. E-mail: akirincich@whoi.edu
Save
  • Barrick, D. E., and Weber B. L. , 1977: On the nonlinear theory for gravity waves on the ocean’s surface. Part II: Interpretation and application. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 7, 1121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrick, D. E., and Lipa B. J. , 1986: Correcting for distorted antenna patterns in CODAR ocean surface measurements. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 11, 304309.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrick, D. E., and Lipa B. J. , 1997: Evolution of bearing determination in HF current mapping radars. Oceanography, 10, 7275.

  • COS, 2009: SeaSonde Radial Site Software Suite documentation, release 6. Codar Ocean Systems.

  • Cosoli, S., Mazzoldi A. , and Miroslav G. , 2010: Validation of surface current measurements in the northern Adriatic Sea from high-frequency radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 908919.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Creamer, D., Henyey F. , Schult R. , and Wright J. , 1989: Improved linear representation of ocean surface waves. J. Fluid Mech., 205, 135161.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Crombie, D., 1955: Doppler spectrum of the sea echo at 13.56 Mc/s. Nature, 175, 681682.

  • de Paolo, T., and Terrill E. , 2007a: Properties of HF radar compact antenna arrays and their effect on the MUSIC algorithm. Scripps Institution of Oceanography Tech. Rep., 40 pp. [Available online at http://escholarship.org/uc/item/5bw303tj.]

  • de Paolo, T., and Terrill E. , 2007b: Skill assessment of resolving ocean surface current structure using compact-antenna style HF RADAR and the MUSIC direction finding algorithm. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 12771300.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emery, B., Washburn L. , and Harlan J. , 2004: Evaluating radial current measurements from CODAR high-frequency radars with moored current meters. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 12591271.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ganju, N. K., Lentz S. J. , Kirincich A. R. , and Farrar J. , 2011: Complex mean circulation over the inner shelf south of Martha’s Vineyard revealed by observations and a high-resolution model. J. Geophys. Res., 116, C10036, doi:10.1029/2011JC007035.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Halle, C., 2008: HF radar processing using “nearest-neighbor” statistics. Bodega Marine Laboratory Tech. Rep., 26 pp. [Available online at http://bml.ucdavis.edu/boon/pdf/MethodsPaperHalle.pdf.]

  • Kim, S. Y., Terrill E. , and Cornuelle B. , 2007: Objectively mapping HF radar-derived surface current data using measured and idealized data covariance matrices. J. Geophys. Res., 112, C06021, doi:10.1029/2006JC003756.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kohut, J. T., and Glenn S. , 2003: Improving HF radar surface current measurements with measured antenna beam patterns. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 13031316.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kohut, J. T., Roarty H. J. , and Glenn S. M. , 2006: Characterizing observed environmental variability with HF Doppler radar surface current mappers and acoustic Doppler current profilers: Environmental variability in the coastal ocean. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 876884, doi:10.1109/JOE.2006.886095.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laws, K., Paduan J. , and Vesecky J. , 2010: Estimation and assessment of errors related to antenna pattern distortion in CODAR seasonde high-frequency radar ocean current measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 10291043.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lentz, S., Fewings M. , Howd P. , Fredericks J. , and Hathaway K. , 2008: Observations and a model of undertow over the inner continental shelf. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 23412357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipa, B. J., Nyden B. , Ullman D. , and Terrill E. , 2006: Seasonde radial velocities: Derivation and internal consistency. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 850861.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mao, Y., and Heron M. , 2008: The influence of fetch on the response of surface currents to wind studied by the HF Ocean Surface Radar. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 38, 11071121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NDBC, 2009: Handbook of automated data quality control checks and procedures. NDBC Tech. Doc. 09–02, 78 pp. [Available online at http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/NDBCHandbookofAutomatedDataQualityControl2009.pdf.]

  • Ohlmann, C., White P. , Washburn L. , Terrill E. , Emery B. , and Otero M. , 2007: Interpretation of coastal HF radar–derived surface currents with high-resolution drifter data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 666680.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paduan, J., and Graber H. , 1997: Introduction to high-frequency radar: Reality and myth. Oceanography, 10, 3639.

  • Paduan, J., Kim K. C. , Cook M. S. , and Chavez F. P. , 2006: Calibration and validation of direction-finding high-frequency radar ocean surface current observations. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 862875, doi:10.1109/JOE.2006.886195.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pawlowicz, R., Beardsley B. , and Lentz S. , 2002: Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using T_TIDE. Comput. Geosci., 28, 929937.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmidt, R., 1986: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 34, 276280.

  • Stewart, R., and Joy J. , 1974: HF radio measurements of surface currents. Deep-Sea Res., 21, 10391049.

  • Ullman, D. S., and Codiga D. L. , 2004: Seasonal variation of a coastal jet in the Long Island Sound outflow region based on HF radar and Doppler current observations. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C07S06, doi:10.1029/2002JC001660.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ullman, D. S., O’Donnell J. , Kohut J. , Fake T. , and Allen A. , 2006: Trajectory prediction using HF radar surface currents: Monte Carlo simulations of prediction uncertainties. J. Geophys. Res., 111, C12005, doi:10.1029/2006JC003715.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 478 212 19
PDF Downloads 232 70 5