Why Did Large Differences Arise in the Sea Surface Temperature Datasets across the Tropical Pacific during 2012?

Boyin Huang * NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Boyin Huang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michelle L’Heureux +NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Michelle L’Heureux in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jay Lawrimore * NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Jay Lawrimore in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chunying Liu #ERT, Inc., Laurel, Maryland

Search for other papers by Chunying Liu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Huai-Min Zhang * NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Huai-Min Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Viva Banzon * NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, Asheville, North Carolina

Search for other papers by Viva Banzon in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zeng-Zhen Hu +NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Zeng-Zhen Hu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Arun Kumar +NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, College Park, Maryland

Search for other papers by Arun Kumar in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

During June–November 2012, pronounced differences in tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies were observed between three widely used SST products: the extended reconstructed SST version 3b (ERSSTv3b), and the optimum interpolation SST version 2 analyses (OISST), produced weekly (OISSTwk) and daily (OISSTdy). During June–August 2012, the Niño-3.4 SST anomaly (SSTA) index was 0.2°–0.3°C lower in ERSSTv3b than in OISSTwk and OISSTdy, while it was 0.3°–0.4°C higher from September to November 2012. Such differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index can impact the assessment of the status of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, which is determined using a threshold of ±0.5°C in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index.

To investigate the reasons for the differences between ERSSTv3b and OISSTdy/OISSTwk, an experimental analysis (called ERSSTsat) is created that is similar to ERSSTv3b but includes satellite-derived SSTs. However, significant differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index remained between ERSSTsat and OISSTdy/OISSTwk. Comparisons of ERSSTsat and OISSTdy indicate that their differences are mostly associated with the different schemes for bias adjustment applied to the satellite-based SSTs. It is therefore suggested that the differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index between ERSSTv3b and OISSTdy cannot be solely due to the inclusion of but by the bias adjustment methodology of satellite data in OISSTdy.

Finally, the SST products are compared with observations from ships, buoys, and satellites. On the monthly time scale, the area-averaged Niño-3.4 SSTA index in the tropical Pacific is more consistent with in situ observations in ERSSTv3b than in OISSTdy. In contrast, pointwise observations across the tropical Pacific are more consistent with OISSTdy than ERSSTv3b. It is therefore suggested that the differences among SST products are partially due to a structural uncertainty of various SST estimates.

Corresponding author address: Boyin Huang, NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, NC 28801. E-mail: boyin.huang@noaa.gov

Abstract

During June–November 2012, pronounced differences in tropical Pacific sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies were observed between three widely used SST products: the extended reconstructed SST version 3b (ERSSTv3b), and the optimum interpolation SST version 2 analyses (OISST), produced weekly (OISSTwk) and daily (OISSTdy). During June–August 2012, the Niño-3.4 SST anomaly (SSTA) index was 0.2°–0.3°C lower in ERSSTv3b than in OISSTwk and OISSTdy, while it was 0.3°–0.4°C higher from September to November 2012. Such differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index can impact the assessment of the status of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, which is determined using a threshold of ±0.5°C in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index.

To investigate the reasons for the differences between ERSSTv3b and OISSTdy/OISSTwk, an experimental analysis (called ERSSTsat) is created that is similar to ERSSTv3b but includes satellite-derived SSTs. However, significant differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index remained between ERSSTsat and OISSTdy/OISSTwk. Comparisons of ERSSTsat and OISSTdy indicate that their differences are mostly associated with the different schemes for bias adjustment applied to the satellite-based SSTs. It is therefore suggested that the differences in the Niño-3.4 SSTA index between ERSSTv3b and OISSTdy cannot be solely due to the inclusion of but by the bias adjustment methodology of satellite data in OISSTdy.

Finally, the SST products are compared with observations from ships, buoys, and satellites. On the monthly time scale, the area-averaged Niño-3.4 SSTA index in the tropical Pacific is more consistent with in situ observations in ERSSTv3b than in OISSTdy. In contrast, pointwise observations across the tropical Pacific are more consistent with OISSTdy than ERSSTv3b. It is therefore suggested that the differences among SST products are partially due to a structural uncertainty of various SST estimates.

Corresponding author address: Boyin Huang, NOAA/National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, NC 28801. E-mail: boyin.huang@noaa.gov
Save
  • Banzon, V. F., Reynolds R.W. , and Smith T. M. , 2010: The role of satellite data in extended reconstruction of sea surface temperatures. Extended Abstracts, Oceans from Space Symp., Venice, Italy, European Commission, 27–28, doi:10.2788/8394.

  • Barnston, A. G., Chelliah M. , and Goldenberg S. B. , 1997: Documentation of a highly ENSO-related SST region in the equatorial Pacific. Atmos.–Ocean, 35, 367383.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Errico, R. M., Yang R. , Privé N. C. , Tai K.-S. , Todling R. , Sienkiewicz M. E. , and Guo J. , 2013: Development and validation of observing-system simulation experiments at NASA’s Global Modeling and Assimilation Office. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 139, 1162–1178, doi:10.1002/qj.2027.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kennedy, J. J., Rayner N. A. , Smith R. O. , Parker D. E. , and Saunby M. , 2011: Reassessing biases and other uncertainties in sea surface temperature observations measured in situ since 1850: 2. Biases and homogenization. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D14104, doi:10.1029/2010JD015220.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McPhaden, M. J., and Coauthors, 1998: The tropical ocean-global atmosphere observing system: A decade of progress. J. Geophys. Res., 103 (C7), 14 16914 240.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Merchant, C. J., and Coauthors, 2012: A 20 year independent record of sea surface temperature for climate from Along-Track Scanning Radiometers. J. Geophys. Res., 117, C12013, doi:10.1029/2012JC008400.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. W., and Smith T. M. , 1994: Improved global sea surface temperature analyses using optimum interpolation. J. Climate, 7, 929948.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. W., Rayner N. A. , Smith T. M. , Stokes D. C. , and Wang W. , 2002: An improved in situ and satellite SST analysis for climate. J. Climate, 15, 16091625.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. W., Smith T. M. , Liu C. , Chelton D. B. , Casey K. S. , and Schlax M. G. , 2007: Daily high-resolution blended analyses for sea surface temperature. J. Climate, 20, 54735496.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. W., Chelton D. B. , Roberts-Jones J. , Martin M. J. , Menemenlis D. , and Merchant C. J. , 2013: Objective determination of feature resolution in two sea surface temperature analyses. J. Climate,26, 2514–2533.

  • Smith, T. M., Reynolds R. W. , Peterson T. C. , and Lawrimore J. , 2008: Improvements to NOAA’s historical merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis (1880–2006). J. Climate, 21, 22832296.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van den Dool, H. M., Saha S. , and Johansson A. , 2000: Empirical orthogonal teleconnections. J. Climate, 13, 14211435.

  • Vidard, A., Anderson D. L. T. , and Balmaseda M. , 2007: Impact of ocean observation systems on ocean analysis and seasonal forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 409429.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Woodruff, S. D., and Coauthors, 2011: ICOADS release 2.5: Extensions and enhancements to the surface marine meteorological archive. Int. J. Climatol., 31, 951967, doi:10.1002/joc.2103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Worley, S. J., Woodruff S. D. , Reynolds R. W. , Lubker S. J. , and Lott N. , 2005: ICOADS release 2.1 data and products. Int. J. Climatol., 25, 823842.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xue, Y., Smith T. M. , and Reynolds R. W. , 2003: Interdecadal changes of 30-yr SST normals during 1871–2000. J. Climate, 16, 16011612.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, H.-M., Reynolds R. W. , and Smith T. M. , 2004: Bias characteristics in the AVHRR sea surface temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L01307, doi:10.1029/2003GL018804.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, H.-M., Reynolds R. W. , and Smith T. M. , 2006: Adequacy of the in situ observing system in the satellite era for climate SST. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 107120.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1102 635 168
PDF Downloads 224 66 7