Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Water Level and Wave Height Estimates at NOAA Tide Stations from Acoustic and Microwave Sensors

Joseph Park National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Joseph Park in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
Robert Heitsenrether National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by Robert Heitsenrether in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
William Sweet National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland

Search for other papers by William Sweet in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Oct 2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00021.1
Page(s):
2294–2308
Restricted access

Abstract

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is transitioning the primary water level sensor at the majority of tide stations in the National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON) from an acoustic ranging system to a microwave radar system. Field comparison of the acoustic and microwave systems finds statistically equivalent performance when temperature gradients between the acoustic sensor and water surface are small and when significant wave height is less than roughly 0.5 m. When significant wave height is greater than approximately 0.5–1 m, the acoustic system consistently reports lower water levels. An analysis of 2 months of acoustic and microwave water level data at Duck, North Carolina, finds that the majority of differences between the two sensors can be attributed to systemic errors in the acoustic system and that the microwave system captures water level variability with higher fidelity than the acoustic system. NWLON real-time data products include the water level standard deviation, a statistic that can serve as a proxy for significant wave height. This study identifies 29 coastal water level stations that are candidates for monitoring wave height based on water level standard deviation, potentially adding a significant source of data for the sparsely sampled coastal wave fields around the United States, and finds that the microwave sensor is better suited than the acoustic system for wave height estimates.

Denotes Open Access content.

Corresponding author address: Joseph Park, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS, 1305 East–West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: joseph.park@noaa.gov

Abstract

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is transitioning the primary water level sensor at the majority of tide stations in the National Water Level Observation Network (NWLON) from an acoustic ranging system to a microwave radar system. Field comparison of the acoustic and microwave systems finds statistically equivalent performance when temperature gradients between the acoustic sensor and water surface are small and when significant wave height is less than roughly 0.5 m. When significant wave height is greater than approximately 0.5–1 m, the acoustic system consistently reports lower water levels. An analysis of 2 months of acoustic and microwave water level data at Duck, North Carolina, finds that the majority of differences between the two sensors can be attributed to systemic errors in the acoustic system and that the microwave system captures water level variability with higher fidelity than the acoustic system. NWLON real-time data products include the water level standard deviation, a statistic that can serve as a proxy for significant wave height. This study identifies 29 coastal water level stations that are candidates for monitoring wave height based on water level standard deviation, potentially adding a significant source of data for the sparsely sampled coastal wave fields around the United States, and finds that the microwave sensor is better suited than the acoustic system for wave height estimates.

Denotes Open Access content.

Corresponding author address: Joseph Park, NOAA/NOS/CO-OPS, 1305 East–West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 20910. E-mail: joseph.park@noaa.gov
Save
Cover Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology
Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology

  • Boon, J. D., Heitsenrether R. M. , and Bushnell M. , 2009: Microwave-acoustic water level sensor comparisons: Sensor response to change in oceanographic and meteorological parameters. Proc. Oceans ʼ09, Biloxi, MS, IEEE/OES, 10 pp.

  • Boon, J. D., Heitsenrether R. M. , and Hensley W. M. , 2012: Multi-sensor evaluation of microwave water level error. Proc. Oceans ʼ12, Hampton Roads, VA, MTS/IEEE, 8 pp., doi:10.1109/OCEANS.2012.6405079.

  • Edwing, R. F., 1991: Next Generation Water Level Measurement System (NGWLMS): Site design, preparation, and installation manual. NOAA Tech. Rep., 213 pp. [Available online at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/NextGenerationWaterLevelMeasurementSystemMANUAL.pdf.]

  • Heitsenrether, R. M., 2009: Using microwave range sensors for long term remote sensing of ocean surface dynamics. 17th Conf. on Atmospheric and Oceanic Fluid Dynamics, Stowe, VT, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 8.2. [Available online at https://ams.confex.com/ams/17Fluid15Middle/webprogram/Paper154150.html.]

  • Heitsenrether, R. M., and Davis E. , 2011: Limited acceptance of the design analysis WaterLog H-3611i microwave radar water level sensor. Test and Evaluation Rep., NOAA Tech. Rep. NOS CO-OPS 061, 97 pp. [Available online at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/Technical_Report_NOS_CO-OPS_061.pdf.]

  • Heitsenrether, R. M., Bushnell M. , and Boon J. , 2008: Understanding the impact of surface waves on microwave water level measurements. Proc. Oceans ʼ08, Quebec City, QC, Canada, IEEE/OES, 8 pp., doi:10.1109/OCEANS.2008.5151923.

  • Hunter, J. R., 2003: On the temperature correction of the Aquatrak acoustic tide gauge. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 1230–1235, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1230:OTTCOT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • IOOS, 2009: A national operational wave observation plan. Integrated Ocean Observing System Tech. Rep., 76 pp. [Available online at http://www.ioos.noaa.gov/library/wave_plan_final_03122009.pdf.]

  • Morris, C. S., DiNardo S. J. , and Christensen E. J. , 1995: Overview of the TOPEX/Poseidon Platform Harvest verification experiment. Mar. Geod., 18, 25–37, doi:10.1080/15210609509379740.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Munk, W. H., 1951: Origin and generation of waves. Proceedings of First Conference on Coastal Engineering, J. W. Johnson, Ed., Vol. 1, Council on Wave Research, 1–4.

  • NOAA, 2013a: Environmental measurement systems: Sensor specifications and measurement algorithms. NOAA CO-OPS, 9 pp. [Available online at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/CO-OPS_Measure_Spec_07_July_2013.pdf.]

  • NOAA, 2013b: Station information, Duck, NC. Station ID: 8651370, NOAA. [Available online at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/stationhome.html?id=8651370.]

  • Parke, M. E., and Gill S. K. , 1995: On the sea state dependence of sea level measurements at Platform Harvest. Mar. Geod., 18, 105–111, doi:10.1080/15210609509379746.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Porter, D. L., and Shih H. H. , 1996: Investigation of temperature effects on NOAA’s Next Generation Water Level Measurement System. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 714–725, doi:10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013<0714:IOTEON>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

  • Shih, H. H., 1981: The water level response inside an open protective well to surface wave excitation. NOAA Tech. Rep., 47 pp.

  • Shih, H. H., and Rogers D. , 1981: Error analysis for tide measurement systems utilizing stilling wells. NOAA Tech. Rep., 113 pp.

  • Vogt, C. J., Croucher A. , and Mooney J. , 1986: The Aquatrak water level sensor field test at Shady Side, Maryland. STD-N-494, Submarine Technology Dept., Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, 66 pp.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 609 186 11
PDF Downloads 450 175 8