A Method for Retrieving the Ground Flash Fraction and Flash Type from Satellite Lightning Mapper Observations

William J. Koshak NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by William J. Koshak in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Richard J. Solakiewicz Chicago State University, Chicago, Illinois

Search for other papers by Richard J. Solakiewicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An analytic perturbation method is introduced for retrieving the lightning ground flash fraction in a set of N lightning flashes observed by a satellite lightning mapper. The value of N must be large, typically in the thousands, and the satellite lightning optical observations consist of the maximum group area (MGA) produced by each flash. Moreover, the method subsequently determines the flash type (ground or cloud) of each of the N flashes. Performance tests of the method were conducted using simulated observations that were based on Optical Transient Detector (OTD) and Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) data. It is found that the mean ground flash fraction retrieval errors are below 0.04 across the full range 0–1 under the nominal conditions defined. In general, it is demonstrated that the retrieval errors depend on many factors (i.e., the number N of satellite observations, the magnitude of random and systematic instrument measurement errors, the ground flash fraction itself, and the number of samples used to form certain climate distributions employed in the method). The fraction of flashes accurately flash typed by the method averaged better than 78%. Overall, the accuracy of ground flash fraction and flash-typing retrievals degrade as the simulated population ground and cloud flash MGA distributions become more identical. Finally, because the analytic perturbation method was found to be quite robust (i.e., it performed well for several arbitrary underlying MGA distributions), it is not restricted to the lightning problem studied here but can be applied to any inverse problem having a similar problem statement.

Denotes Open Access content.

Corresponding author address: William Koshak, Earth Science Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, ZP11, 320 Sparkman Dr., Huntsville, AL 35805-1912. E-mail: william.koshak@nasa.gov

Abstract

An analytic perturbation method is introduced for retrieving the lightning ground flash fraction in a set of N lightning flashes observed by a satellite lightning mapper. The value of N must be large, typically in the thousands, and the satellite lightning optical observations consist of the maximum group area (MGA) produced by each flash. Moreover, the method subsequently determines the flash type (ground or cloud) of each of the N flashes. Performance tests of the method were conducted using simulated observations that were based on Optical Transient Detector (OTD) and Lightning Imaging Sensor (LIS) data. It is found that the mean ground flash fraction retrieval errors are below 0.04 across the full range 0–1 under the nominal conditions defined. In general, it is demonstrated that the retrieval errors depend on many factors (i.e., the number N of satellite observations, the magnitude of random and systematic instrument measurement errors, the ground flash fraction itself, and the number of samples used to form certain climate distributions employed in the method). The fraction of flashes accurately flash typed by the method averaged better than 78%. Overall, the accuracy of ground flash fraction and flash-typing retrievals degrade as the simulated population ground and cloud flash MGA distributions become more identical. Finally, because the analytic perturbation method was found to be quite robust (i.e., it performed well for several arbitrary underlying MGA distributions), it is not restricted to the lightning problem studied here but can be applied to any inverse problem having a similar problem statement.

Denotes Open Access content.

Corresponding author address: William Koshak, Earth Science Office, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, ZP11, 320 Sparkman Dr., Huntsville, AL 35805-1912. E-mail: william.koshak@nasa.gov
Save
  • Christian, H. J., Blakeslee R. J. , and Goodman S. J. , 1992: Lightning Imaging Sensor for the Earth Observing System. NASA Tech. Memo. NASA TM-4350, 44 pp.

  • Christian, H. J., Driscoll K. T. , Goodman S. J. , Blakeslee R. J. , Mach D. M. , and Buechler D. E. , 1996: The Optical Transient Detector (OTD). Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, ICAE, 368–371.

  • Christian, H. J., and Coauthors, 1999: The Lightning Imaging Sensor. 11th International Conference on Atmospheric Electricity, NASA Conf. Proc. NASA/CP-1999-209261, 746–749.

  • Christian, H. J., and Coauthors, 2003: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector. J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4005, doi:10.1029/2002JD002347.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cummins, K. L., and Murphy M. J. , 2009: An overview of lightning locating systems: History, techniques, and data uses, with an in-depth look at the U.S. NLDN. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 51, 499518, doi:10.1109/TEMC.2009.2023450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goodman, S. J., and Coauthors, 2013: The GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM). Atmos. Res., 125–126, 3449, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.01.006.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hutchins, M. L., Holzworth R. H. , Brundell J. B. , and Rodger C. J. , 2012: Relative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network. Radio Sci., 47, RS6005, doi:10.1029/2012RS005049.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., 2010: Optical characteristics of OTD flashes and the implications for flash-type discrimination. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 18221838, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1405.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., 2011: A mixed exponential distribution model for retrieving ground flash fraction from satellite lightning imager data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 475492, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1438.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., and Solakiewicz R. J. , 2011: Retrieving the fraction of ground flashes from satellite lightning imager data using CONUS-based optical statistics. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 459473, doi:10.1175/2010JTECHA1408.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., and Solakiewicz R. J. , 2012: The ground flash fraction retrieval algorithm employing differential evolution: Simulations and applications. NOAA Satellite Science Week Meeting, Kansas City, MO, NOAA. [Available online at http://www.goes-r.gov/downloads/2012-Science-Week/poster-abstracts-tues/06_Koshak.pdf.]

  • Mach, D. M., Christian H. J. , Blakeslee R. J. , Boccippio D. J. , Goodman S. J. , and Boeck W. L. , 2007: Performance assessment of the Optical Transient Detector and Lightning Imaging Sensor. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09210, doi:10.1029/2006JD007787.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rudlosky, S. D., and Shea D. T. , 2013: Evaluating WWLLN performance relative to TRMM/LIS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 2344–2348, doi:10.1002/grl.50428.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1228 959 47
PDF Downloads 271 47 1