• Alizadeh-Choobari, O., P. Zawar-Reza, and A. Sturman, 2014: The “wind of 120 days” and dust storm activity over the Sistan Basin. Atmos. Res., 143, 328341, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.02.001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Arctic Submarine Laboratory, 2018: ICEX 2018 briefing book. Arctic Submarine Laboratory Doc., 29 pp.

  • Barlow, M., B. Zaitchik, S. Paz, E. Black, J. Evans, and A. Hoell, 2016: A review of drought in the Middle East and southwest Asia. J. Climate, 29, 85478574, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00692.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bretherton, F. P., R. E. Davis, and C. B. Fandry, 1976: A technique for objective analysis and design of oceanographic experiments applied to MODE-73. Deep-Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr., 23, 559582, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(76)90001-2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chu, J. H., A. Levine, S. Daida, D. Schiber, E. Fukuda, and C. R. Sampson, 2017: The Joint Typhoon Warning Center tropical cyclone best-tracks, 1945–2017. Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command, accessed 1 March 2020, https://www.metoc.navy.mil/jtwc/jtwc.html?best-tracks.

  • Coral Reef Research Foundation, 2014: A summary of Palau’s typhoon history 1945-2013. Coral Reef Research Foundation Tech. Rep., 17 pp.

  • Daley, R., 1991: Atmospheric Data Analysis. Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 471 pp.

  • Davis, R. E., 1985: Objective mapping by least squares fitting. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 47734777, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC090iC03p04773.

  • Duffie, W., 2015: ONR-sponsored technology aids recovery of Alaska plane wreck. ONR, https://www.onr.navy.mil/en/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2015/XMET-Used-In-Alaska-Plane-Crash-Recovery.

  • Emery, W. J., and R. J. Thomson, 2001: Data Analysis Methods in Physical Oceanography. Gulf Professional Publishing, 638 pp.

  • Esmaili, O., and M. Tajrishy, 2006: Results of the 50 year ground-based measurements in comparison with satellite remote sensing of two prominent dust emission sources located in Iran. Proc. SPIE, 6362, 636209, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.692989.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fiebrich, C. A., 2009: History of surface weather observations in the United States. Earth-Sci. Rev., 93, 7784, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2009.01.001.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fuller, J. F., 1974: Weather and war. U.S. Air Force Air Weather Service Rep., 25 pp.

  • Fuller, J. F., 1990: Thor’s Legions. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 443 pp.

  • Goudie, A. S., and N. J. Middleton, 2006: Desert Dust in the Global System. Springer, 287 pp.

  • Gouezo, M., Y. Golbuu, R. van Woesik, L. Rehm, S. Koshiba, and C. Doropoulos, 2015: Impact of two sequential super typhoons on coral reef communities in Palau. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 540, 7385, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11518.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hamidi, M., M. R. Kavianpour, and Y. Shao, 2013: Synoptic analysis of dust storms in the Middle East. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 49, 279286, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0027-9.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Holthuijsen, L. H., N. Booji, and L. Bertotti, 1996: The propagation of wind errors through ocean wave hindcasts. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng., 118, 184189, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2828832.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Joint Staff, 2018: Meteorological and oceanographic operations. U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Publ. 3-59, 90 pp.

  • Kaskaoutis, D., A. Rashki, E. Houssos, A. Mofidi, D. Goto, A. Bartzokas, P. Francois, and M. Legrand, 2014: Meteorological aspects associated with dust storms in the Sistan region, southeastern Iran. Climate Dyn., 45, 407424, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2208-3.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kayanne, H., H. Yamano, and R. H. Randall, 2002: Holocene sea-level changes and barrier reef formation on an ocean island, Palau Islands, western Pacific. Sediment. Geol., 150, 4760, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00267-6.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, C. C., T. Y. Shyu, T. H. Lin, and C. Y. Liu, 2015: Satellite-derived normalized difference convection index for typhoon observations. J. Appl. Remote Sens., 9, 096074, https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.9.096074.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lyapustin, A., Y. Wang, I. Laszlo, R. Kahn, S. Korkin, L. Remer, and J. S. Reid, 2011: Multiangle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC): 2. Aerosol algorithm. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D03211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Middleton, N. J., 1986: Dust storms in the Middle East. J. Arid Environ., 10, 8396, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(18)31249-7.

  • Miller, S. D., 2003: A consolidated technique for enhancing desert dust storms with MODIS. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2071, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018279.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miller, S. D., A. P. Kuciauskas, M. Liu, Q. Ji, J. S. Reid, D. W. Breed, A. L. Walker, and A. A. Mandoos, 2008: Haboob dust storms of the southern Arabian Peninsula. J. Geophys. Res., 113, D01202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008550.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, M. S., 2016: Short-range acoustic propagation under Arctic ice cover ICEX-16. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Oceanography, Naval Postgraduate School, 55 pp.

  • OFCM, 2017: Surface weather observations and reports. OFCM Doc., 98 pp.

  • Ponce de León, S., and F. J. Ocampo-Torres, 1998: Sensitivity of a wave model to wind variability. J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31793201, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC02328.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Prasad, A. K., and R. P. Singh, 2007: Changes in aerosol parameters during major dust storm events (2001–2005) over Indo-Gangetic plains using AERONET and MODIS data. J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007778.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ranjbar, M., and F. Iranmanesh, 2008: Effects of “drought” on “wind eroding and erosion” in Sistan region with use of satellite multiple images. Islamic Azad Univ., Shahre Rey Branch, 14–30.

  • Rashki, A., and D. Kaskaoutis, C. J. de W. Rautenbach, and P., Eriksson, 2012: Changes of permanent lake surfaces, and their consequences for dust aerosols and air quality: The Hamoun Lakes of the Sistan area, Iran. Atmospheric Aerosols—Regional Characteristics—Chemistry and Physics, H. Addul-Razzak, Ed., InTech, 162–202, https://doi.org/10.5772/48776.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Reynolds, R. M., 2002: Meteorology and climate. The Gulf Ecosystem: Health and Sustainability. N. Y. Khan, M. Munawar, and A. R. G. Price, Eds., Backhuys Publishers, 41–51.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ridley, D., C. Heald, J. Pierce, and M. J. Evans, 2013: Toward resolution-independent dust emissions in global models: Impacts on the seasonal and spatial distribution of dust. Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 28732877, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50409.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rogowski, P., J. Zavala-Garay, K. Shearman, E. Terrill, J. Wilkin, and T. H. Lam, 2019: Air-sea-land forcing in the Gulf of Tonkin: Assessing seasonal variability using modern tools. Oceanography, 32 (2), 150161, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2019.223.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Saeed, T. M., and H. Al-Dashti, 2011: Optical and physical characterization of “Iraqi Freedom” dust storm, a case study. Theor. Appl. Climatol., 104, 123137, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-010-0334-3.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shao, Y., 2008: Physics and Modelling of Wind Erosion. Springer, 452 pp.

  • Teixeira, J. C., M. P. Abreu, and C. Guedes Soares, 1995: Uncertainty of ocean wave hindcasts due to wind modeling. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 117, 294297, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2827237.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tolman, H. L., 1999: User manual and system documentation of Wavewatch-III version 1.18. NOAA/NCEP Tech. Note 166, 110 pp.

  • Vishkaee, F. A., C. Flamant, J. Cuesta, P. Flamant, and H. R. Khalesifard, 2011: Multiplatform observations of dust vertical distribution during transport over northwest Iran in the summertime. J. Geophys. Res., 116, D05206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014573.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vishkaee, F. A., C. Flamant, J. Cuesta, L. Oolman, P. Flamant, and H. R. Khalesifard, 2012: Dust transport over Iraq and northwest Iran associated with winter shamal: A case study. J. Geophys. Res., 117, D03201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilderson, W. D, 1991: Dust and sand forecasting in Iraq and adjoining countries. USAF Environmental Technical Applications Center Rep., 72 pp.

  • Wood, L. E., 1946: Automatic weather stations. J. Meteor., 3, 115121, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1946)003<0115:AWS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 382 0 0
Full Text Views 495 321 5
PDF Downloads 365 221 14

XMET—An Unattended Meteorological Sensing System for Austere Environments

Peter Rogowski Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Peter Rogowski in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0225-5341
,
Mark Otero Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Mark Otero in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joel Hazard Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Joel Hazard in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Thomas Muschamp Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Thomas Muschamp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Scott Katz Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Scott Katz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Eric Terrill Coastal Observing Research and Development Center, Marine Physical Laboratory, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Eric Terrill in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Accurate surface meteorological (MET) observations reported reliably and in near–real time remain a critical component of on-scene environmental observation systems. Presented is a system developed by Scripps Institution of Oceanography that allows for rapid, global deployment of ground-based weather observations to support both timely decision-making and collection of high-quality weather time series for science or military applications in austere environments. Named the Expeditionary Meteorological (XMET), these weather stations have been deployed in extreme conditions devoid of infrastructure ranging from tropical, polar, maritime, and desert environments where near continuous observations were reported. To date, over 1 million weather observations have been collected during 225 deployments around the world with a data report success rate of 99.5%. XMET had its genesis during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), when the U.S. Marine Corps 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing identified an immediate capability gap in environmental monitoring of their operation area due to high spatiotemporal variability of dust storms in the region. To address the sensing gap, XMET was developed to be a portable, expendable, ruggedized, self-contained, bidirectional, weather observation station that can be quickly deployed anywhere in the world to autonomously sample and report aviation weather observations. This paper provides an overview of the XMETs design, reliability in different environments, and examples of unique meteorological events that highlight both the unit’s reliability and ability to provide quality time series. The overview shows expeditionary MET sensing systems, such as the XMET, are able to provide long-term continuous observational records in remote and austere locations essential for regional spatiotemporal MET characterization.

ORCID: 0000-0003-0225-5341.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0016.s1.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Peter Rogowski, progowski@ucsd.edu

Abstract

Accurate surface meteorological (MET) observations reported reliably and in near–real time remain a critical component of on-scene environmental observation systems. Presented is a system developed by Scripps Institution of Oceanography that allows for rapid, global deployment of ground-based weather observations to support both timely decision-making and collection of high-quality weather time series for science or military applications in austere environments. Named the Expeditionary Meteorological (XMET), these weather stations have been deployed in extreme conditions devoid of infrastructure ranging from tropical, polar, maritime, and desert environments where near continuous observations were reported. To date, over 1 million weather observations have been collected during 225 deployments around the world with a data report success rate of 99.5%. XMET had its genesis during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), when the U.S. Marine Corps 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing identified an immediate capability gap in environmental monitoring of their operation area due to high spatiotemporal variability of dust storms in the region. To address the sensing gap, XMET was developed to be a portable, expendable, ruggedized, self-contained, bidirectional, weather observation station that can be quickly deployed anywhere in the world to autonomously sample and report aviation weather observations. This paper provides an overview of the XMETs design, reliability in different environments, and examples of unique meteorological events that highlight both the unit’s reliability and ability to provide quality time series. The overview shows expeditionary MET sensing systems, such as the XMET, are able to provide long-term continuous observational records in remote and austere locations essential for regional spatiotemporal MET characterization.

ORCID: 0000-0003-0225-5341.

Supplemental information related to this paper is available at the Journals Online website: https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0016.s1.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Peter Rogowski, progowski@ucsd.edu

Supplementary Materials

    • Supplemental Materials (PDF 995 KB)
Save