A Technique for Determining Three-Dimensional Storm Cloud-Top Locations Using Stereo Optical Lightning Pulses Observed from Orbit

Douglas Mach aScience and Technology Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Douglas Mach in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4541-6590
and
Katrina Virts bUniversity of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, Alabama

Search for other papers by Katrina Virts in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

We have developed a technique to estimate the three-dimensional (3D) location of lightning optical pulses based on the stereo view of common lightning pulses from two different orbital instruments. The technique only requires the satellite position and the look vector to the lightning optical source. An example dataset of the Geostationary Lightning Mappers (GLMs) on GOES-16 and GOES-17 from 10 June 2019 is used to illustrate the technique. For this dataset, we find that the values for the stereo determination of cloud-top altitudes are on average lower by 740 m than the ones calculated from the lightning ellipsoid that is currently applied during geolocation. When we compare the locations to the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Cloud Height Algorithm (ACHA), we find that our technique also produces slightly lower altitude values by 240 m. There is greater spread in our technique than either the lightning ellipsoid or the ABI cloud-top height that is likely due to the incorrect pairing of groups between the two GLMs and the 8–14-km resolution in the group locations. Based on GLM location errors derived from comparisons to ground truth sources, the uncertainty in the radial location determined by the stereo location technique is 5.2 km, while the altitude uncertainty is 4.0 km. The technique can be used to 3D map lightning or other optical sources such as bolides and other upper-atmospheric optical phenomena from any two orbital sensors with overlapping fields of view.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Douglas Mach, dmach@usra.edu

Abstract

We have developed a technique to estimate the three-dimensional (3D) location of lightning optical pulses based on the stereo view of common lightning pulses from two different orbital instruments. The technique only requires the satellite position and the look vector to the lightning optical source. An example dataset of the Geostationary Lightning Mappers (GLMs) on GOES-16 and GOES-17 from 10 June 2019 is used to illustrate the technique. For this dataset, we find that the values for the stereo determination of cloud-top altitudes are on average lower by 740 m than the ones calculated from the lightning ellipsoid that is currently applied during geolocation. When we compare the locations to the Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) Cloud Height Algorithm (ACHA), we find that our technique also produces slightly lower altitude values by 240 m. There is greater spread in our technique than either the lightning ellipsoid or the ABI cloud-top height that is likely due to the incorrect pairing of groups between the two GLMs and the 8–14-km resolution in the group locations. Based on GLM location errors derived from comparisons to ground truth sources, the uncertainty in the radial location determined by the stereo location technique is 5.2 km, while the altitude uncertainty is 4.0 km. The technique can be used to 3D map lightning or other optical sources such as bolides and other upper-atmospheric optical phenomena from any two orbital sensors with overlapping fields of view.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Douglas Mach, dmach@usra.edu
Save
  • Al-Hussaini, E. K., 1991: A characterization of the Burr type XII distribution. Appl. Math. Lett., 4, 5961, https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(91)90123-D.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Blakeslee, R. J., and Coauthors, 2020: Three years of the lightning imaging sensor onboard the International Space Station: Expanded global coverage and enhanced applications. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2020JD032918, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032918.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Boggs, L. D., N. Liu, M. Peterson, S. Lazarus, M. Splitt, F. Lucena, A. Nag, and H. K. Rassoul, 2019: First observations of gigantic jets from geostationary orbit. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 39994006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082278.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Burr, I. W., 1942: Cumulative frequency functions. Ann. Math. Stat., 13, 215232, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731607.

  • Chmielewski, V. C., and E. C. Bruning, 2016: Lightning Mapping Array flash detection performance with variable receiver thresholds. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121, 86008614, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025159.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Earth Networks, 2014: Earth Networks Global Lightning Network. Subset used: August 2019–January 2021. Global Hydrology Resource Center Distributed Active Archive Center, accessed 1 February 2021, http://www.earthnetworks.com/Products/TotalLightningNetwork.aspx.

  • GOES-R Algorithm Working Group, 2018: NOAA GOES-R series Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) level 2 cloud top height (ACHA). NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, accessed 1 June 2021, https://doi.org/10.7289/V5HX19ZQ.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Goodman, S., D. Mach, W. Koshak, and R. Blakeslee, 2012: GLM Lightning cluster-filter algorithm, version 3.0. NOAA NESDIS Center for Satellite Applications and Research Algorithm Theoretical Basis Doc., 73 pp., https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/goesr/documents/ATBDs/Baseline/ATBD_GOES-R_GLM_v3.0_Jul2012.pdf.

  • Goodman, S., and Coauthors, 2013: The GOES-R Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM). Atmos. Res., 125–126, 3449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.01.006.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jenniskens, P., and Coauthors, 2018: Detection of meteoroid impacts by the Geostationary Lightning Mapper on the GOES-16 satellite. Meteorit. Planet. Sci., 53, 24452469, https://doi.org/10.1111/maps.13137.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kokou, P., P. Willemsen, M. Lekouara, M. Arioua, A. Mora, P. Van den Braembussche, E. Neri, and D. M. A. Aminou, 2018: Algorithmic chain for lightning detection and false event filtering based on the MTG Lightning Imager. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 56, 51155124, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2808965.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., E. P. Krider, N. Murray, and D. J. Boccippio, 2007: Lightning charge retrievals: Dimensional reduction, LDAR constraints, and a first comparison with LIS satellite data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 18171838, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2089.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Koshak, W. J., D. Mach, M. Bateman, P. Armstrong, and K. Virts, 2018: GOES-16 GLM level 2 data full validation data quality. NOAA Rep., 16 pp., https://www.noaasis.noaa.gov/pdf/ps-pvr/goes-16/GLM/Full/GOES16_GLM_FullValidation_ProductPerformanceGuide.pdf.

  • Liu, C., and S. Heckman, 2012: Total lightning data and real-time severe storm prediction. Conf. Meteorological and Environmental Instruments and Methods of Observation, Brussels, Belgium, World Meteorological Organization, P5 (10), https://library.wmo.int/pmb_ged/iom_109_en/Session5/P5_10_Liu_Total_Lightning_Data_and_Real-Time_Severe_Storm_Prediction.pdf.

  • Mach, D. M., 2020: Geostationary Lightning Mapper clustering algorithm stability. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2019JD031900, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031900.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mallick, S., and Coauthors, 2014: Evaluation of the GLD360 performance characteristics using rocket-and-wire triggered lightning data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 36363642, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL059920.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NOAA, 2019: GOES-R series data book: Revision A, May 2019. NASA Doc. CDRL PM-14, 240 pp., https://www.goes-r.gov/downloads/resources/documents/GOES-RSeriesDataBook.pdf.

  • Peterson, M., 2020a: Modeling the transmission of optical lightning signals through complex 3-D cloud scenes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 125, e2020JD033231, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033231.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Peterson, M., 2020b: Holes in optical lightning flashes: Identifying poorly-transmissive clouds in Lightning Imager data. Earth Space Sci., 7, e2020EA001294, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001294.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rudlosky, S. D., and K. S. Virts, 2021: Dual Geostationary Lightning Mapper observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 149, 979998, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-20-0242.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rudlosky, S. D., S. J. Goodman, K. S. Virts, and E. C. Bruning, 2019: Initial Geostationary Lightning Mapper observations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 10971104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081052.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schmit, T., P. Griffith, M. M. Gunshor, J. M. Daniels, S. J. Goodman, and W. J. Lebair, 2017: A closer look at the ABI on the GOES-R series. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 681698, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00230.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tadikamalla, P. R., 1980: A look at the Burr and related distributions. Int. Stat. Rev., 48, 337344, https://doi.org/10.2307/1402945.

  • Thomas, R. J., P. R. Krehbiel, W. Rison, S. J. Hunyady, W. P. Winn, T. Hamlin, and J. Harlin, 2004: Accuracy of the Lightning Mapping Array. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D14207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004549.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vaisala, 2014: Global Lightning dataset GLD360. Subset used: August 2019–January 2021. Global Hydrology Resource Center Distributed Active Archive Center, accessed 1 February 2021, https://www.vaisala.com/en/products/data-subscriptions-and-reports/data-sets/gld360.

  • van der Velde, O. A., and Coauthors, 2019: Gigantic jet discharges evolve stepwise through the middle atmosphere. Nat. Commun., 10, 4350, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12261-y.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Virts, K., and W. J. Koshak, 2020: Mitigation of Geostationary Lightning Mapper geolocation errors. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 37, 17251736, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0100.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 160 0 0
Full Text Views 299 208 5
PDF Downloads 333 226 10