• Brodtkorb, P., P. Johannesson, G. Lindgren, I. Rychlik, J. Rydén, and E. Sjö, 2000: WAFO—A MATLAB toolbox for the analysis of random waves and loads. Proc. 10th Int. Offshore and Polar Eng. Conf., Seattle, WA, ISOPE, 343–350.

  • Candella, R. N., 2016: Rogue waves off the south/southeastern Brazilian coast. Nat. Hazards, 83, 211232, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2312-2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ducrozet, G., F. Bonnefoy, D. Le Touzé, and P. Ferrant, 2016: HOS-ocean: Open-source solver for nonlinear waves in open ocean based on high-order spectral method. Comput. Phys. Commun., 203, 245254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.017.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dysthe, K., H. E. Krogstad, and P. Müller, 2008: Oceanic rogue waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, 287310, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gilhousen, D. B., 1994: The value of NDBC observations during March 1993’s “storm of the century.” Wea. Forecasting, 9, 255264, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1994)009<0255:TVONOD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Goring, D. G., and V. I. Nikora, 2002: Despiking acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J. Hydraul. Eng., 128, 117126, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2002)128:1(117).

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, M.-C., 2004: Wave parameters and functions in wavelet analysis with filtering. Ocean Eng., 31, 813831, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2003.10.004.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IOOS, 2019: Manual for real-time quality control of in-situ surface wave data: A guide to quality control and quality assurance of in-situ surface wave observations version 2.1. IOOS Doc., 70 pp.

  • Komen, G. J., L. Cavaleri, M. Donelan, K. Hasselmann, S. Hasselmann, and P. Janssen, 1996: Dynamics and Modelling of Ocean Waves. Cambridge University Press, 554 pp.

  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1983: On the joint distribution of wave periods and amplitudes in a random wave field. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, 389A, 241258, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1983.0107.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NDBC, 2009: Handbook of automated data quality control checks and procedures. NDBC Tech. Doc. 09-02, 78 pp.

  • Raghukumar, K., G. Chang, F. Spada, C. Jones, T. Janssen, and A. Gans, 2019: Performance characteristics of “Spotter,” a newly developed real-time wave measurement buoy. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 36, 11271141, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0151.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tucker, M., 1993: Recommended standard for wave data sampling and near-real-time processing. Ocean Eng., 20, 459474, https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(93)90015-A.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Voermans, J. J., H. Rapizo, H. Ma, F. Qiao, and A. V. Babanin, 2019: Air–sea momentum fluxes during Tropical Cyclone Olwyn. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 49, 13691379, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-18-0261.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Voermans, J. J., P. B. Smit, T. T. Janssen, and A. V. Babanin, 2020: Estimating wind speed and direction using wave spectra. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 125, e2019JC015717, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015717.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhou, M., P. P. Niiler, Y. Zhu, and R. D. Dorland, 2006: The western boundary current in the Bransfield Strait, Antarctica. Deep-Sea Res. I, 53, 12441252, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2006.04.003.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 108 108 29
Full Text Views 26 26 5
PDF Downloads 34 34 6

Wave Anomaly Detection in Wave Measurements

View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • | 2 Laboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
  • | 3 Laboratory of Ocean and Atmosphere Studies, Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (OBT/INPE), São José dos Campos, Brazil
  • | 4 Institute of Energy and Environment, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
© Get Permissions
Restricted access

Abstract

Quality control measures for ocean waves observations are necessary to give confidence of their accuracy. It is common practice to detect anomalies or outliers in surface displacement observations by applying a standard deviation threshold. Besides being a purely statistical method, this quality control procedure is likely to flag extreme wave events erroneously, thereby impacting higher-order descriptions of the wave field. In this paper we extend the use of the statistical phase-space threshold, an established outlier detection method in the field of turbulence, to detect anomalies in a wave record. We show that a wave record in phase space (here defined as a diagram of displacement against acceleration) can be enclosed by a predictable ellipse where the major and minor axes are defined by the spectral properties of the wave field. By using the parameterized ellipse in phase space as a threshold to identify wave anomalies, this is a semiphysical filtering method. Wave buoy data obtained from a mooring deployed near King George Island, Antarctica [as part of the Antarctic Modeling Observation System (ATMOS)], and laser altimeter data obtained at the Northwest Shelf of Australia were used to demonstrate the functioning of the filtering methodology in identifying wave anomalies. Synthetic data obtained using a high-order spectral model are used to identify how extreme waves are positioned in phase space.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Joey Voermans, jvoermans@unimelb.edu.au

Abstract

Quality control measures for ocean waves observations are necessary to give confidence of their accuracy. It is common practice to detect anomalies or outliers in surface displacement observations by applying a standard deviation threshold. Besides being a purely statistical method, this quality control procedure is likely to flag extreme wave events erroneously, thereby impacting higher-order descriptions of the wave field. In this paper we extend the use of the statistical phase-space threshold, an established outlier detection method in the field of turbulence, to detect anomalies in a wave record. We show that a wave record in phase space (here defined as a diagram of displacement against acceleration) can be enclosed by a predictable ellipse where the major and minor axes are defined by the spectral properties of the wave field. By using the parameterized ellipse in phase space as a threshold to identify wave anomalies, this is a semiphysical filtering method. Wave buoy data obtained from a mooring deployed near King George Island, Antarctica [as part of the Antarctic Modeling Observation System (ATMOS)], and laser altimeter data obtained at the Northwest Shelf of Australia were used to demonstrate the functioning of the filtering methodology in identifying wave anomalies. Synthetic data obtained using a high-order spectral model are used to identify how extreme waves are positioned in phase space.

© 2021 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Joey Voermans, jvoermans@unimelb.edu.au
Save