• Abramovich, Y., and N. Spencer, 2004: Performance breakdown of subspace-based methods in arbitrary antenna arrays: GLRT-based prediction and cure. 2004 IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Montreal, QC, Canada, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326208.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Abramovich, Y., B. A. Johnson, and X. Mestre, 2009: DOA estimation in the small-sample threshold region. Classical and Modern Direction-of-Arrival Estimation, T. E. Tuncer and B. Friedlander, Eds., Academic Press, 219287, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374524-8.00006-4.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Amar, A., and A. J. Weiss, 2007: Resolution of closely spaced deterministic with given success rate signals. 2007 IEEE Int. Symp. on Information Theory, Nice, France, IEEE, 17911795, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2007.4557481.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barrick, D. E., and B. J. Lipa, 1999: Radar angle determination with MUSIC direction finding. U.S. Patent 5 990 834, 12 pp.

  • Chandran, S., 2006: Advances in Direction-of-Arrival Estimation. Artech House, 474 pp.

  • Cosoli, S., A. Mazzoldi, and M. Gačić, 2010: Validation of surface current measurements in the northern Adriatic Sea from high-frequency radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 908919, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHO680.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davis, R. E., 1985: Drifter observations of coastal surface currents during CODE: The statistical and dynamical views. J. Geophys. Res., 90, 47564772, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC090iC03p04756.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • de Paolo, T., T. Cook, and E. Terrill, 2007: Properties of HF radar compact antenna arrays and their effect on the MUSIC algorithm. OCEANS 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, IEEE, https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2007.4449265.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emery, B. M., 2020: Evaluation of alternative direction of arrival methods for oceanographic HF radars. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 45, 9901003, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2019.2914537.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emery, B. M., 2021: HFR CS processing toolbox for MATLAB, software release version 2.0. Zenodo, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5598294.

  • Emery, B. M., and L. Washburn, 2019: Uncertainty estimates for SeaSonde HF radar ocean current observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 36, 231247, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0104.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Emery, B. M., L. Washburn, and J. Harlan, 2004: Evaluating radial current measurements from CODAR high-frequency radars with moored current meters. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 12591271, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2004)021<1259:ERCMFC>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Graber, H. C., B. K. Haus, R. D. Chapman, and L. K. Shay, 1997: HF radar comparisons with moored estimates of current speed and direction: Expected differences and implications. J. Geophys. Res., 102, 18 74918 766, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC01190.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kaplan, D., M. Cook, and D. Atwater, 2007: HFRProgs: High frequency radar program suite. GitHub, https://github.com/rowg/hfrprogs.

  • Kelly, E. J., and K. M. Forsythe, 1989: Adaptive detection and parameter estimation for multidimensional signal models. MIT Lexington Lincoln Lab Tech. Rep., 241 pp.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirincich, A., 2016: Remote sensing of the surface wind field over the coastal ocean via direct calibration of HF radar backscatter power. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 33, 13771392, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-15-0242.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirincich, A., 2018: LERA HF radar developer package. GitHub, https://github.com/akirincich/lera_dpd.git.

  • Kirincich, A., B. Emery, L. Washburn, and P. Flament, 2019: Improving surface current resolution using direction finding algorithms for multiantenna high-frequency radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 36, 19972014, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-19-0029.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Krim, H., and M. Viberg, 1996: Two decades of array signal processing research: The parametric approach. IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 13, 6794, https://doi.org/10.1109/79.526899.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laws, K. E., D. M. Fernandez, and J. D. Paduan, 2000: Simulation-based evaluations of HF radar ocean current algorithms. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 25, 481491, https://doi.org/10.1109/48.895355.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipa, B. J., 2003: Uncertainties in SeaSonde current velocities. Proc. IEEE/OES Seventh Working Conf. on Current Measurement Technology, San Diego, CA, IEEE, 95100, https://doi.org/10.1109/CCM.2003.1194291.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipa, B. J., and D. E. Barrick, 1983: Least-squares methods for the extraction of surface currents from CODAR crossed-loop data: Application at ARSLOE. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 8, 226253, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.1983.1145578.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lipa, B. J., B. Nyden, D. S. Ullman, and E. Terrill, 2006: SeaSonde radial velocities: Derivation and internal consistency. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 850861, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2006.886104.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liu, Y., R. H. Weisberg, C. R. Merz, S. Lichtenwalner, and G. J. Kirkpatrick, 2010: HF radar performance in a low-energy environment: CODAR SeaSonde experience on the west Florida shelf. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 27, 16891710, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JTECHO720.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Molcard, A., P. Poulain, P. Forget, A. Griffa, Y. Barbin, J. Gaggelli, J. De Maistre, and M. Rixen, 2009: Comparison between VHF radar observations and data from drifter clusters in the Gulf of La Spezia (Mediterranean Sea). J. Mar. Syst., 78, S79S89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.01.012.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ohlmann, C., P. White, L. Washburn, B. Emery, E. Terrill, and M. Otero, 2007: Interpretation of coastal HF radar–derived surface currents with high-resolution drifter data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 666680, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1998.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ottersten, B., M. Viberg, P. Stoica, and A. Nehorai, 1993: Exact and large sample ML techniques for parameter estimation and detection in array processing. Radar Array Processing, Springer, 99151.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Paduan, J. D., K. C. Kim, M. S. Cook, and F. P. Chavez, 2006: Calibration and validation of direction-finding high-frequency radar ocean surface current observations. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 862875, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2006.886195.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Percival, D. B., and A. T. Walden, 1993: Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications. Cambridge University Press, 583 pp.

  • Schmidt, R., 1986: Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 34, 276280, https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.1986.1143830.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stewart, R. H., and J. W. Joy, 1974: HF radio measurements of ocean surface currents. Deep-Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr., 21, 10391049, https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(74)90066-7.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Swindlehurst, A. L., and P. Stoica, 1998: Maximum likelihood methods in radar array signal processing. Proc. IEEE, 86, 421441, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.659495.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tuncer, T. E., T. K. Yasar, and B. Friedlander, 2009: Narrowband and wideband DOA estimation for uniform and nonuniform linear arrays. Classical and Modern Direction-of-Arrival Estimation, E. Tuncer and B. Friedlander, Eds., Elsevier, 125159.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Trees, H. L., 2002: Optimum Array Processing. Part IV, Detection, Estimation and Modulation Theory, John Wiley and Sons, 1472 pp., https://doi.org/10.1002/0471221104.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wax, M., 1991: Detection and localization of multiple sources via the stochastic signals model. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 39, 24502456, https://doi.org/10.1109/78.98000.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wax, M., and T. Kailath, 1985: Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria. IEEE Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 33, 387392, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164557.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wilks, S. S., 1938: The large-sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat., 9, 6062, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732360.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wyatt, L. R., J. J. Green, A. Middleditch, M. D. Moorhead, J. Howarth, M. Holt, and S. Keogh, 2006: Operational wave, current, and wind measurements with the Pisces HF radar. IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., 31, 819834, https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2006.888378.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ziskind, I., and M. Wax, 1988: Maximum likelihood localization of multiple sources by alternating projection. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 36, 15531560, https://doi.org/10.1109/29.7543.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 177 115 0
Full Text Views 111 84 16
PDF Downloads 112 81 14

Direction Finding and Likelihood Ratio Detection for Oceanographic HF Radars

Brian EmeryaMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California

Search for other papers by Brian Emery in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5760-6722
,
Anthony KirincichbWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Anthony Kirincich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Libe WashburnaMarine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California
cDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California

Search for other papers by Libe Washburn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Previous work with simulations of oceanographic high-frequency (HF) radars has identified possible improvements when using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for direction of arrival; however, methods for determining the number of emitters (here defined as spatially distinct patches of the ocean surface) have not realized these improvements. Here we describe and evaluate the use of the likelihood ratio (LR) for emitter detection, demonstrating its application to oceanographic HF radar data. The combined detection–estimation methods MLE-LR are compared with multiple signal classification method (MUSIC) and MUSIC parameters for SeaSonde HF radars, along with a method developed for 8-channel systems known as MUSIC-Highest. Results show that the use of MLE-LR produces similar accuracy, in terms of the RMS difference and correlation coefficients squared, as previous methods. We demonstrate that improved accuracy can be obtained for both methods, at the cost of fewer velocity observations and decreased spatial coverage. For SeaSondes, accuracy improvements are obtained with less commonly used parameter sets. The MLE-LR is shown to be able to resolve simultaneous closely spaced emitters, which has the potential to improve observations obtained by HF radars operating in complex current environments.

Significance Statement

We identify and test a method based on the likelihood ratio (LR) for determining the number of signal sources in observations subject to direction finding with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Direction-finding methods are used in broad-ranging applications that include radar, sonar, and wireless communication. Previous work suggests accuracy improvements when using MLE, but suitable methods for determining the number of simultaneous signal sources are not well known. Our work shows that the LR, when combined with MLE, performs at least as well as alternative methods when applied to oceanographic high-frequency (HF) radars. In some situations, MLE and LR obtain superior resolution, where resolution is defined as the ability to distinguish closely spaced signal sources.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Brian Emery, brian.emery@ucsb.edu

Abstract

Previous work with simulations of oceanographic high-frequency (HF) radars has identified possible improvements when using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for direction of arrival; however, methods for determining the number of emitters (here defined as spatially distinct patches of the ocean surface) have not realized these improvements. Here we describe and evaluate the use of the likelihood ratio (LR) for emitter detection, demonstrating its application to oceanographic HF radar data. The combined detection–estimation methods MLE-LR are compared with multiple signal classification method (MUSIC) and MUSIC parameters for SeaSonde HF radars, along with a method developed for 8-channel systems known as MUSIC-Highest. Results show that the use of MLE-LR produces similar accuracy, in terms of the RMS difference and correlation coefficients squared, as previous methods. We demonstrate that improved accuracy can be obtained for both methods, at the cost of fewer velocity observations and decreased spatial coverage. For SeaSondes, accuracy improvements are obtained with less commonly used parameter sets. The MLE-LR is shown to be able to resolve simultaneous closely spaced emitters, which has the potential to improve observations obtained by HF radars operating in complex current environments.

Significance Statement

We identify and test a method based on the likelihood ratio (LR) for determining the number of signal sources in observations subject to direction finding with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). Direction-finding methods are used in broad-ranging applications that include radar, sonar, and wireless communication. Previous work suggests accuracy improvements when using MLE, but suitable methods for determining the number of simultaneous signal sources are not well known. Our work shows that the LR, when combined with MLE, performs at least as well as alternative methods when applied to oceanographic high-frequency (HF) radars. In some situations, MLE and LR obtain superior resolution, where resolution is defined as the ability to distinguish closely spaced signal sources.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Brian Emery, brian.emery@ucsb.edu
Save