Comparison between Weather Signal Simulation in Frequency and Time Domain

Igor R. Ivić aCooperative Institute for Severe and High-Impact Weather Research and Operations, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma
bNOAA/OAR/National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Oklahoma

Search for other papers by Igor R. Ivić in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Simulated weather time series are often used in engineering and research practice to assess radar systems behavior and/or to evaluate the performance of novel techniques. There are two main approaches to simulating weather time series. One is based on summing individual returns from a large number of distributed weather particles to create a cumulative return. The other is aimed at creating simulated random signals based on the predetermined values of radar observables and is of interest herein. So far, several methods to simulate weather time series, using the latter approach, have been proposed. All of these methods are based on applying the inverse discrete Fourier transform to the spectral model with added random fluctuations. To meet the desired simulation accuracy, such an approach typically requires generating the number of samples that is larger than the base sample number due to the discrete Fourier transform properties. In that regard, a novel method to determine simulation length is proposed. It is based on a detailed theoretical development that demonstrates the exact source of errors incurred by this approach. Furthermore, a simple method for time series simulation that is based on the autocorrelation matrix exists. This method neither involves manipulations in the spectral domain nor requires generating the number of samples larger than the base sample number. Herein, this method is suggested for weather time series simulation and its accuracy and efficiency are analyzed and compared to the spectral-based approach.

Significance Statement

All research articles published so far on the topic of weather time series simulation propose the use of inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) when based on the desired Doppler moment values. Herein, a detailed theoretical development that demonstrates the exact source of errors incurred by this approach is presented. Also, a novel method to determine the simulation length that is based on the theoretical error computation is proposed. As an alternative, a computationally efficient general method (not using IDFT) previously developed for the simulation of sequences with desired properties is suggested for weather time series simulation. It is demonstrated that the latter method produces accurate results within overall shorter computational times. Moreover, it is shown that the use of graphics processing unit (GPU), ubiquitous in modern computers, significantly reduces computational times compared to the sole use of central processing unit (CPU) for all simulation-related calculations.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Igor R. Ivić, igor.ivic@noaa.gov

Abstract

Simulated weather time series are often used in engineering and research practice to assess radar systems behavior and/or to evaluate the performance of novel techniques. There are two main approaches to simulating weather time series. One is based on summing individual returns from a large number of distributed weather particles to create a cumulative return. The other is aimed at creating simulated random signals based on the predetermined values of radar observables and is of interest herein. So far, several methods to simulate weather time series, using the latter approach, have been proposed. All of these methods are based on applying the inverse discrete Fourier transform to the spectral model with added random fluctuations. To meet the desired simulation accuracy, such an approach typically requires generating the number of samples that is larger than the base sample number due to the discrete Fourier transform properties. In that regard, a novel method to determine simulation length is proposed. It is based on a detailed theoretical development that demonstrates the exact source of errors incurred by this approach. Furthermore, a simple method for time series simulation that is based on the autocorrelation matrix exists. This method neither involves manipulations in the spectral domain nor requires generating the number of samples larger than the base sample number. Herein, this method is suggested for weather time series simulation and its accuracy and efficiency are analyzed and compared to the spectral-based approach.

Significance Statement

All research articles published so far on the topic of weather time series simulation propose the use of inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) when based on the desired Doppler moment values. Herein, a detailed theoretical development that demonstrates the exact source of errors incurred by this approach is presented. Also, a novel method to determine the simulation length that is based on the theoretical error computation is proposed. As an alternative, a computationally efficient general method (not using IDFT) previously developed for the simulation of sequences with desired properties is suggested for weather time series simulation. It is demonstrated that the latter method produces accurate results within overall shorter computational times. Moreover, it is shown that the use of graphics processing unit (GPU), ubiquitous in modern computers, significantly reduces computational times compared to the sole use of central processing unit (CPU) for all simulation-related calculations.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Igor R. Ivić, igor.ivic@noaa.gov
Save
  • Bringi, V., and V. Chandrasekar, 2001: Polarimetric Doppler Weather Radar. Cambridge University Press, 636 pp.

  • Capsoni, C., and M. D’Amico, 1998: A physically based radar simulator. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 15, 593598, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015<0593:APBRS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Capsoni, C., M. D’Amico, and R. Nebuloni, 2001: A multiparameter polarimetric radar simulator. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 18, 17991809, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<1799:AMPRS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheong, B. L., R. D. Palmer, and M. Xue, 2008: A time series weather radar simulator based on high-resolution atmospheric models. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 25, 230243, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JTECHA923.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cho, J. Y. N., 2005: Multi-PRI signal processing for the terminal Doppler weather radar. Part II: Range–velocity ambiguity mitigation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 22, 15071519, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1805.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cooley, J. W., and J. W. Tukey, 1965: An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series. Math. Comput., 19, 297301, https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0178586-1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curtis, C. D., 2018: Weather radar time series simulation: Improving accuracy and performance. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 35, 21692187, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0215.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Curtis, C. D., and S. M. Torres, 2011: Adaptive range oversampling to achieve faster scanning on the National Weather Radar Testbed phased-array radar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 28, 15811597, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-10-05042.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doviak, R. J., and D. S. Zrnić, 1993: Doppler Radar and Weather Observations. Academic Press, 562, pp.

  • Frehlich, R. G., and M. J. Yadlowsky, 1994: Performance of mean frequency estimators for Doppler radar and lidar. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 12171230, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011<1217:POMFEF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Galati, G., and G. Pavan, 1995: Computer simulation of weather radar signals. Simul. Pract. Theory, 3, 1744, https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-4869(95)00009-I.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harris, F. J., 1978: On the use of windows for harmonic analysis with the discrete Fourier transform. Proc. IEEE, 66, 5183, https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1978.10837.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ivić, I. R., 2014: On the use of a radial-based noise power estimation technique to improve estimates of the correlation coefficient on dual-polarization weather radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 31, 18671880, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00052.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ivić, I. R., 2017: An approach to simulate the effects of antenna patterns on polarimetric variable estimates. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 19071934, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0015.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ivić, I. R., 2019: A simple hybrid technique to reduce bias of copolar correlation coefficient estimates. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 36, 18131833, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0226.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Johnson, G. E., 1994: Constructions of particular random processes. Proc. IEEE, 82, 270285, https://doi.org/10.1109/5.265353.

  • Lei, L., G. Zhang, R. J. Doviak, R. Palmer, B. L. Cheong, M. Xue, Q. Cao, and Y. Li, 2012: Multilag correlation estimators for polarimetric radar measurements in the presence of noise. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 772795, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00010.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schvartzman, D., and C. Curtis, 2019: Signal Processing and Radar Characteristics (SPARC) simulator: A flexible dual-polarization weather-radar signal simulation framework based on preexisting radar-variable data. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 12, 135150, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2885614.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sirmans, D., and B. Bumgarner, 1975: Numerical comparison of five mean frequency estimators. J. Appl. Meteor., 14, 9911003, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<0991:NCOFMF>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thompson, R., 1973: Generation of stochastic processes with given spectrum. Util. Math., 3, 127137.

  • Torres, S. M., and D. S. Zrnić, 2003: Whitening in range to improve weather radar spectral moment estimates. Part I: Formulation and simulation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 20, 14331448, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2003)020<1433:WIRTIW>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu, T. Y., G. Zhang, A. B. Chalamalasetti, R. J. Doviak, and D. Zrnić, 2006: Resolution enhancement technique using range oversampling. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 228240, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH1841.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zrnić, D. S., 1975: Simulation of weatherlike Doppler spectra and signals. J. Appl. Meteor., 14, 619620, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1975)014<0619:SOWDSA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 265 0 0
Full Text Views 343 215 7
PDF Downloads 288 145 1