Ocean Tides near Hawaii from Satellite Altimeter Data. Part II

Yuzhe Wang aPhysical Oceanography Laboratory, Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Yuzhe Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yibo Zhang aPhysical Oceanography Laboratory, Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Yibo Zhang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Minjie Xu aPhysical Oceanography Laboratory, Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Minjie Xu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yonggang Wang bLaboratory of Marine Science and Numerical Modeling, First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao, China
cLaboratory for Regional Oceanography and Numerical Modeling, Pilot National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (Qingdao), Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Yonggang Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Xianqing Lv aPhysical Oceanography Laboratory, Qingdao Collaborative Innovation Center of Marine Science and Technology, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China

Search for other papers by Xianqing Lv in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In Part I, the Chebyshev polynomial fitting (CPF) method has been proved to be effective to construct reliable cotidal charts for the eight major tidal constituents (M2, S2, K1, O1, N2, K2, P1, and Q1) near Hawaii and yields accurate results which are consistent with the Finite Element Solutions 2014 (FES2014), National Astronomical Observatory 99b (NAO.99b), and TPXO9 models. In this paper, the method is extended to estimate the harmonic constants of some minor tidal constituents. The mesoscale variation correction is applied to tidal elevations from satellite altimeters to eliminate the potential influence of background mesoscale ocean noise when estimating minor tidal constituents. This correction is necessary and makes the amplitude ratio between P1 and K1 constituents more consistent with the equilibrium tidal theory. Compared with the harmonic constants directly extracted from satellite altimeter data, FES2014 and NAO.99b yield mean root-mean-square (RMS) errors of 0.238 and 0.226 cm, respectively, while CPF method yields a mean RMS error of 0.210 cm, causing a 7%–12% decrease in the RMS error. At the crossover points between ascending and descending tracks, the decrease of RMS errors becomes 15%–18%. The accuracy of this method is also validated by comparing the estimated harmonic constants with those derived from tidal gauges and bottom-pressure recorders. These results indicate that the CPF method is also effective for estimating harmonic constants of minor tidal constituents. More importantly, the CPF method can obtain the harmonic constants of minor tidal constituents directly from satellite altimeter data, instead of being inferred via admittance theory.

Significance Statement

Ocean tides originate from the gravitational attraction of the sun and moon. Among the large number of tidal constituents, the major tidal constituents have been extensively studied. We extend the method proposed in Part I to estimate the harmonic constants of some minor tidal constituents with low amplitudes. The method relies on actual observations of water level variations from satellite altimeters without considering the hydrodynamic equations. We compared the results of this method with those of other models, using the data from satellite altimeters, tidal gauges, and bottom-pressure recorders. We find that the method performs well in estimating harmonic constants for some minor tidal constituents and causes a decrease of 7%–18% in RMS errors compared to other models.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding authors: Minjie Xu, minjiexu0213@163.com; Yonggang Wang, ygwang@fio.org.cn

Abstract

In Part I, the Chebyshev polynomial fitting (CPF) method has been proved to be effective to construct reliable cotidal charts for the eight major tidal constituents (M2, S2, K1, O1, N2, K2, P1, and Q1) near Hawaii and yields accurate results which are consistent with the Finite Element Solutions 2014 (FES2014), National Astronomical Observatory 99b (NAO.99b), and TPXO9 models. In this paper, the method is extended to estimate the harmonic constants of some minor tidal constituents. The mesoscale variation correction is applied to tidal elevations from satellite altimeters to eliminate the potential influence of background mesoscale ocean noise when estimating minor tidal constituents. This correction is necessary and makes the amplitude ratio between P1 and K1 constituents more consistent with the equilibrium tidal theory. Compared with the harmonic constants directly extracted from satellite altimeter data, FES2014 and NAO.99b yield mean root-mean-square (RMS) errors of 0.238 and 0.226 cm, respectively, while CPF method yields a mean RMS error of 0.210 cm, causing a 7%–12% decrease in the RMS error. At the crossover points between ascending and descending tracks, the decrease of RMS errors becomes 15%–18%. The accuracy of this method is also validated by comparing the estimated harmonic constants with those derived from tidal gauges and bottom-pressure recorders. These results indicate that the CPF method is also effective for estimating harmonic constants of minor tidal constituents. More importantly, the CPF method can obtain the harmonic constants of minor tidal constituents directly from satellite altimeter data, instead of being inferred via admittance theory.

Significance Statement

Ocean tides originate from the gravitational attraction of the sun and moon. Among the large number of tidal constituents, the major tidal constituents have been extensively studied. We extend the method proposed in Part I to estimate the harmonic constants of some minor tidal constituents with low amplitudes. The method relies on actual observations of water level variations from satellite altimeters without considering the hydrodynamic equations. We compared the results of this method with those of other models, using the data from satellite altimeters, tidal gauges, and bottom-pressure recorders. We find that the method performs well in estimating harmonic constants for some minor tidal constituents and causes a decrease of 7%–18% in RMS errors compared to other models.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding authors: Minjie Xu, minjiexu0213@163.com; Yonggang Wang, ygwang@fio.org.cn
Save
  • Carrere, L., F. Lyard, M. Cancet, and A. Guillot, 2015: FES 2014, a new tidal model on the global ocean with enhanced accuracy in shallow seas and in the Arctic region. Proc. EGU General Assembly, Vienna, Austria, EGU, 5481.

  • Carrere, L., Y. Faugère, and M. Ablain, 2016: Major improvement of altimetry sea level estimations using pressure-derived corrections based on ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis. Ocean Sci., 12, 825842, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-825-2016.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Carter, G. S., O. B. Fringer, and E. D. Zaron, 2012: Regional models of internal tides. Oceanography, 25 (2), 5665, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2012.42.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, G., Y. Hou, and X. Chu, 2011: Mesoscale eddies in the South China Sea: Mean properties, spatiotemporal variability, and impact on thermohaline structure. J. Geophys. Res., 116, C06018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JC006716.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cheng, Y., and O. B. Andersen, 2011: Multimission empirical ocean tide modeling for shallow waters and polar seas. J. Geophys. Res., 116, C11001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007172.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egbert, G. D., and S. Y. Erofeeva, 2002: Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 183204, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Egbert, G. D., A. F. Bennett, and M. G. G. Foreman, 1994: TOPEX/Poseidon tides estimated using a global inverse model. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24 82124 852, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01894.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fang, G., Y. Wang, Z. Wei, B. H. Choi, X. Wang, and J. Wang, 2004: Empirical cotidal charts of the Bohai, Yellow, and East China Seas from 10 years of TOPEX/Poseidon altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 109, C11006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002484.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gérard, P., and B. Luzum, Eds., 2010: IERS conventions (2010). IERS Tech. Note 36, 179 pp.

  • Godin, G., 1972: The Analysis of Tides. University of Toronto Press, 264 pp.

  • Hart-Davis, M., G. Piccioni, D. Dettmering, C. Schwatke, M. Passaro, and F. Seitz, 2021: EOT20—A global empirical ocean tide model from multi-mission satellite altimetry. SEANOE, accessed 15 May 2021, https://doi.org/10.17882/79489.

  • Hsu, P. C., H. J. Lee, Q. Zheng, J. W. Lai, F. C. Su, and C. R. Ho, 2020: Tide-induced periodic sea surface temperature drops in the coral reef area of Nanwan Bay, southern Taiwan. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 125, e2019JC015226, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015226.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lefèvre, F., F. H. Lyard, C. Le Provost, and E. J. O. Schrama, 2002: FES99: A global tide finite element solution assimilating tide gauge and altimetric information. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 19, 13451356, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<1345:FAGTFE>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Letellier, T., 2004: Etude des ondes de marée sur les plateaux continentaux (Study of tidal waves on the continental shelves). Ph.D. thesis, University of Toulouse III-Paul Sabatier, 237 pp.

  • Matsumoto, K., T. Takanezawa, and M. Ooe, 2000: Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/Poseidon altimeter data into hydrodynamical model: A global model and a regional model around Japan. J. Oceanogr., 56, 567581, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011157212596.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Munk, W., and C. Wunsch, 1998: Abyssal recipes II: Energetics of tidal and wind mixing. Deep-Sea Res. I, 45, 19772010, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-0637(98)00070-3.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pawlowicz, R., B. Beardsley, and S. Lentz, 2002: Classical tidal harmonic analysis including error estimates in MATLAB using TDE. Comput. Geosci., 28, 929937, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(02)00013-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pedley, M., J. G. Paren, and J. R. Potter, 1986: The tidal spectrum underneath Antarctic ice shelves. J. Geophys. Res., 91, 13 00113 009, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC091iC11p13001.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ponte, A. L., P. Klein, M. Dunphy, and S. Le Gentil, 2017: Low-mode internal tides and balanced dynamics disentanglement in altimetric observations: Synergy with surface density observations. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 122, 21432155, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012214.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ray, R. D., 2013: Precise comparisons of bottom-pressure and altimetric ocean tides. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 118, 45704584, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrc.20336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ray, R. D., 2017: On tidal inference in the diurnal band. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 34, 437446, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0142.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schlax, M. G., and D. B. Chelton, 1994: Aliased tidal errors in TOPEX/Poseidon sea surface height data. J. Geophys. Res., 99, 24 76124 775, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01925.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Stammer, D., and Coauthors, 2014: Accuracy assessment of global barotropic ocean tide models. Rev. Geophys., 52, 243282, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000450.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sulzbach, R., H. Dobslaw, and M. Thomas, 2021: High-resolution numerical modeling of barotropic global ocean tides for satellite gravimetry. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 126, e2020JC017097, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC017097.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Taguchi, E., D. Stammer, and W. Zahel, 2014: Inferring deep ocean tidal energy dissipation from the global high-resolution data-assimilative HAMTIDE model. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 119, 45734592, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009766.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Weis, P., M. Thomas, and J. Sündermann, 2008: Broad frequency tidal dynamics simulated by a high-resolution global ocean tide model forced by ephemerides. J. Geophys. Res., 113, C10029, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JC004556.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xu, M., Y. Wang, S. Wang, X. Lv, and X. Chen, 2021: Ocean tides near Hawaii from satellite altimeter data. Part I. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 38, 937949, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0072.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zaron, E. D., and R. D. Ray, 2018: Aliased tidal variability in mesoscale sea level anomaly maps. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 35, 24212435, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-18-0089.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhao, Z., 2018: The global mode-2 M2 internal tide. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 123, 77257746, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JC014475.

  • Zu, T., J. Gan, and S. Y. Erofeeva, 2008: Numerical study of the tide and tidal dynamics in the South China Sea. Deep-Sea Res. I, 55, 137154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2007.10.007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 320 0 0
Full Text Views 398 185 4
PDF Downloads 361 143 2