Measuring a Rogue? An Investigation into an Apparent Giant Wave

Adi Kurniawan aOceans Graduate School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Search for other papers by Adi Kurniawan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul H. Taylor aOceans Graduate School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Search for other papers by Paul H. Taylor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jana Orszaghova aOceans Graduate School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Search for other papers by Jana Orszaghova in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hugh Wolgamot aOceans Graduate School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Search for other papers by Hugh Wolgamot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jeff Hansen bSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Search for other papers by Jeff Hansen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An apparent giant wave event having a maximum trough-to-crest height of 21 m and a maximum zero-upcrossing period of 27 s was recorded by a wave buoy at a nearshore location off the southwestern coast of Australia. It appears as a group of waves that are significantly larger both in height and in period than the waves preceding and following them. This paper reports a multifaceted analysis into the plausibility of the event. We first examine the statistics of the event in relation to the rest of the record, where we look at quantities such as maximum-to-significant wave height ratios, ordered crest–trough statistics, and average wave profiles. We then investigate the kinematics of the buoy, where we look at the relationship between the horizontal and vertical displacements of the buoy, and also attempt to numerically reconstruct the giant event using Boussinesq and nonlinear shallow water equations. Additional analyses are performed on other sea states where at least one of the buoy’s accelerometers reached its maximum limit. Our analysis reveals incompatibilities of the event with known behavior of real waves, leading us to conclude that it was not a real wave event. Wave events similar to the one reported in our study have been reported elsewhere and have sometimes been accepted as real occurrences. Our methods of forensically analyzing the giant wave event should be potentially useful for identifying false rogue wave events in these cases.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Adi Kurniawan, adi.kurniawan@uwa.edu.au

Abstract

An apparent giant wave event having a maximum trough-to-crest height of 21 m and a maximum zero-upcrossing period of 27 s was recorded by a wave buoy at a nearshore location off the southwestern coast of Australia. It appears as a group of waves that are significantly larger both in height and in period than the waves preceding and following them. This paper reports a multifaceted analysis into the plausibility of the event. We first examine the statistics of the event in relation to the rest of the record, where we look at quantities such as maximum-to-significant wave height ratios, ordered crest–trough statistics, and average wave profiles. We then investigate the kinematics of the buoy, where we look at the relationship between the horizontal and vertical displacements of the buoy, and also attempt to numerically reconstruct the giant event using Boussinesq and nonlinear shallow water equations. Additional analyses are performed on other sea states where at least one of the buoy’s accelerometers reached its maximum limit. Our analysis reveals incompatibilities of the event with known behavior of real waves, leading us to conclude that it was not a real wave event. Wave events similar to the one reported in our study have been reported elsewhere and have sometimes been accepted as real occurrences. Our methods of forensically analyzing the giant wave event should be potentially useful for identifying false rogue wave events in these cases.

© 2022 American Meteorological Society. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Adi Kurniawan, adi.kurniawan@uwa.edu.au
Save
  • Adcock, T. A. A., P. H. Taylor, S. Yan, Q. W. Ma, and P. A. E. M. Janssen, 2011: Did the Draupner wave occur in a crossing sea? Proc. Roy. Soc., 467A, 30043021, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2011.0049.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Agnon, Y., P. A. Madsen, and H. A. Schäffer, 1999: A new approach to high-order Boussinesq models. J. Fluid Mech., 399, 319333, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112099006394.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Allsop, N., N. Durand, and D. Hurdle, 1998: Influence of steep seabed slopes on breaking waves for structure design. 26th Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, Copenhagen, Denmark, 906919, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784404119.067.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Barber, N. F., F. Ursell, and G. E. R. Deacon, 1948: The generation and propagation of ocean waves and swell. I. Wave periods and velocities. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A240, 527560, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0005.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Baschek, B., and J. Imai, 2011: Rogue wave observations off the US West Coast. Oceanography, 24 (2), 158165, https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2011.35.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brocchini, M., 2013: A reasoned overview on Boussinesq-type models: The interplay between physics, mathematics and numerics. Proc. Roy. Soc., 469A, 20130496, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0496.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bureau of Meteorology, 2020: Latest weather observations for Albany Airport. Accessed 11 August 2020, http://www.bom.gov.au/products/IDW60801/IDW60801.94802.shtml.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cahill, B., 2013: Characteristics of the wave energy resource at the Atlantic marine energy test site. Ph.D. thesis, University College Cork, 299 pp., https://cora.ucc.ie/handle/10468/1142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chen, Y.-Y., M.-S. Li, H.-C. Hsu, and C.-O. Ng, 2012: Theoretical and experimental study of particle trajectories for nonlinear water waves propagating on a sloping bottom. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc., A370, 15431571, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0446.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Datawell, 2012: A comparative report on the DWRMkIII and DWR4 data. Datawell BV Rep., 13 pp.

  • Datawell, 2019a: Datawell Waverider manual: DWR4. Datawell BV Doc., 129 pp.

  • Datawell, 2019b: Datawell Waverider reference manual: DWR-MkIII, DWR-G, WR-SG. Datawell BV Doc., 137 pp.

  • Didenkulova, E., 2020: Catalogue of rogue waves occurred in the world ocean from 2011 to 2018 reported by mass media sources. Ocean Coastal Manage., 188, 105076, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105076.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dysthe, K., H. E. Krogstad, and P. Müller, 2008: Oceanic rogue waves. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 40, 287310, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.40.111406.102203.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Fedele, F., J. Brennan, S. Ponce de León, J. Dudley, and F. Dias, 2016: Real world ocean rogue waves explained without the modulational instability. Sci. Rep., 6, 27715, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27715.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forristall, G. Z., 1984: The distribution of measured and simulated wave heights as a function of spectral shape. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 10 54710 552, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC089iC06p10547.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Forristall, G. Z., 2000: Wave crest distributions: Observations and second-order theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 30, 19311943, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(2000)030<1931:WCDOAS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gramstad, O., H. Zeng, K. Trulsen, and G. K. Pedersen, 2013: Freak waves in weakly nonlinear unidirectional wave trains over a sloping bottom in shallow water. Phys. Fluids, 25, 122103, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4847035.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haver, S., 2004: A possible freak wave event measured at the Draupner Jacket January 1 1995. Rogue Waves 2004, Brest, France, IFREMER.

  • Haver, S., and O. J. Andersen, 2000: Freak waves: Rare realizations of a typical population or typical realizations of a rare population? 10th Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., Seattle, WA, ISOPE.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herbers, T. H. C., and T. T. Janssen, 2016: Lagrangian surface wave motion and Stokes drift fluctuations. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 46, 10091021, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-15-0129.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Herterich, J. G., and F. Dias, 2019: Extreme long waves over a varying bathymetry. J. Fluid Mech., 878, 481501, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.618.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hunt, A., 2003: Extreme waves, overtopping and flooding at sea defences. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oxford, 258 pp.

  • Jonathan, P., and P. H. Taylor, 1997: On irregular, nonlinear waves in a spread sea. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 119, 3741, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2829043.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Judge, F. M., A. C. Hunt-Raby, J. Orszaghova, P. H. Taylor, and A. G. Borthwick, 2019: Multi-directional focused wave group interactions with a plane beach. Coastal Eng., 152, 103531, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103531.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenain, L., N. Pizzo, and W. K. Melville, 2019: Laboratory studies of Lagrangian transport by breaking surface waves. J. Fluid Mech., 876, R1, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.544.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindgren, G., 1970: Some properties of a normal process near a local maximum. Ann. Math. Stat., 41, 18701883, https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177696688.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lindgren, G., and I. Rychlik, 1991: Slepian models and regression approximations in crossing and extreme value theory. Int. Stat. Rev., 59, 195225.

  • Longuet-Higgins, M. S., 1980: On the distribution of the heights of sea waves: Some effects of nonlinearity and finite band width. J. Geophys. Res., 85, 15191523, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC085iC03p01519.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lygre, A., and H. E. Krogstad, 1986: Maximum entropy estimation of the directional distribution in ocean wave spectra. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 16, 20522060, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1986)016<2052:MEEOTD>2.0.CO;2.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mackay, E. B. L., 2009: Wave energy resource assessment. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 342 pp., https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/79448/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Madsen, P. A., H. B. Bingham, and H. Liu, 2002: A new Boussinesq method for fully nonlinear waves from shallow to deep water. J. Fluid Mech., 462, 130, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002008467.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Magnusson, A. K., and M. A. Donelan, 2013: The Andrea wave characteristics of a measured North Sea rogue wave. J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng., 135, 031108, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023800.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McAllister, M. L., and T. S. van den Bremer, 2020: Experimental study of the statistical properties of directionally spread ocean waves measured by buoys. J. Phys. Oceanogr., 50, 399414, https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-19-0228.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McAllister, M. L., S. Draycott, T. A. A. Adcock, P. H. Taylor, and T. S. van den Bremer, 2019: Laboratory recreation of the Draupner wave and the role of breaking in crossing seas. J. Fluid Mech., 860, 767786, https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.886.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mori, N., P. C. Liu, and T. Yasuda, 2002: Analysis of freak wave measurements in the Sea of Japan. Ocean Eng., 29, 13991414, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(01)00073-7.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nelson, R. C., 1987: Design wave heights on very mild slopes: An experimental study. Civ. Eng. Trans. Inst. Eng. Aust., 29, 157161.

  • O’Brien, L., E. Renzi, J. M. Dudley, C. Clancy, and F. Dias, 2018: Catalogue of extreme wave events in Ireland: Revisedand updated for 14 680 BP to 2017. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 729758, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-729-2018.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olhede, S. C., and A. T. Walden, 2002: Generalized Morse wavelets. IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc., 50, 26612670, https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.804066.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orszaghova, J., A. G. Borthwick, and P. H. Taylor, 2012: From the paddle to the beach—A Boussinesq shallow water numerical wave tank based on Madsen and Sørensen’s equations. J. Comput. Phys., 231, 328344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.08.028.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Orszaghova, J., P. H. Taylor, A. G. Borthwick, and A. C. Raby, 2014: Importance of second-order wave generation for focused wave group run-up and overtopping. Coastal Eng., 94, 6379, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2014.08.007.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Srokosz, M. A., and M. S. Longuet-Higgins, 1986: On the skewness of sea-surface elevation. J. Fluid Mech., 164, 487497, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112086002653.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tayfun, M. A., and F. Fedele, 2007: Wave-height distributions and nonlinear effects. Ocean Eng., 34, 16311649, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.11.006.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tromans, P. S., A. R. Anaturk, and P. Hagemeijer, 1991: A new model for the kinematics of large ocean waves—Application as a design wave. First Int. Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf., Edinburgh, United Kingdom, ISOPE.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trulsen, K., H. Zeng, and O. Gramstad, 2012: Laboratory evidence of freak waves provoked by non-uniform bathymetry. Phys. Fluids, 24, 097101, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4748346.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tucker, M., 1993: Recommended standard for wave data sampling and near-real-time processing. Ocean Eng., 20, 459474, https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-8018(93)90015-A.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Underwood, R., 2013: Lucky escapes in Torndirrup National Park. Landscope, 29, 5356.

  • Voermans, J. J., A. V. Babanin, C. Kirezci, J. T. Carvalho, M. F. Santini, B. F. Pavani, and L. P. Pezzi, 2021: Wave anomaly detection in wave measurements. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 38, 525536, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-20-0090.1.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Whittaker, C. N., A. C. Raby, C. J. Fitzgerald, and P. H. Taylor, 2016: The average shape of large waves in the coastal zone. Coastal Eng., 114, 253264, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2016.04.009.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zhang, J., M. Benoit, O. Kimmoun, A. Chabchoub, and H.-C. Hsu, 2019: Statistics of extreme waves in coastal waters: Large scale experiments and advanced numerical simulations. Fluids, 4, 99, https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids4020099.

    • Crossref
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 637 0 0
Full Text Views 1018 816 383
PDF Downloads 285 109 4