SWIRL: The First Australian Operational Radar-Based 3D Wind Analysis System

Alain Protat aBureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Alain Protat in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8933-874X
,
Valentin Louf aBureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Valentin Louf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jordan P. Brook aBureau of Meteorology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Search for other papers by Jordan P. Brook in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

In this paper, the first Australian operational radar-based three-dimensional (3D) wind analysis system named Synthetic Wind Information from Radar and Lidar (SWIRL) is described and evaluated. SWIRL employs a variational minimization formulation to combine results from four individual wind retrieval techniques of varied complexity to derive 3D winds in single-Doppler and multi-Doppler radar regions: a variational version of the traditional velocity azimuth display (VVAD) and double VAD (DVAD) techniques, a single-Doppler wind retrieval technique using optical flow horizontal wind proxies, and a multi-Doppler 3D wind retrieval technique. The SWIRL 3D wind components are evaluated against wind profiler observations and radar simulations using a very high-resolution (50 m) numerical simulation of a supercell thunderstorm. We find that SWIRL can retrieve very accurate horizontal winds, especially below 2-km height in the multi-Doppler regions, with mean absolute errors on wind speed and direction < 2 m s−1 and 10° on average and <2.5 m s−1 and 15°–20° 90% of the time. These errors do not increase noticeably with wind speed, highlighting the suitability of these retrieved winds to be used for damaging and destructive wind detection and nowcasting. The single-Doppler retrieval using optical flow is also found to provide reasonably accurate winds at these heights. The accurate retrieval of convective-scale updrafts and downdrafts, even using multi-Doppler information, is still a major challenge, with mean absolute errors of vertical velocity of about 50% on average. This can be attributed to the limitations of the current radar technology used operationally, imposing slow antenna speeds.

Significance Statement

Damaging and destructive winds have the potential to inflict significant damage to properties and assets and, tragically, result in loss of life. Efficient direction of emergency services to affected areas is essential for a prompt return to normal conditions. Wind farm operators require precise information on anticipated wind shifts to reduce the risk of energy grid failures. Strong winds also contribute to compound weather events, such as water ingress through hail-damaged roofs or structural damage to buildings caused by hailstones. The purpose of this work was to equip Australia with the first operational wind monitoring system, based on operational radar observations, to serve all these critical applications (and more).

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Alain Protat, alain.protat@bom.gov.au

Abstract

In this paper, the first Australian operational radar-based three-dimensional (3D) wind analysis system named Synthetic Wind Information from Radar and Lidar (SWIRL) is described and evaluated. SWIRL employs a variational minimization formulation to combine results from four individual wind retrieval techniques of varied complexity to derive 3D winds in single-Doppler and multi-Doppler radar regions: a variational version of the traditional velocity azimuth display (VVAD) and double VAD (DVAD) techniques, a single-Doppler wind retrieval technique using optical flow horizontal wind proxies, and a multi-Doppler 3D wind retrieval technique. The SWIRL 3D wind components are evaluated against wind profiler observations and radar simulations using a very high-resolution (50 m) numerical simulation of a supercell thunderstorm. We find that SWIRL can retrieve very accurate horizontal winds, especially below 2-km height in the multi-Doppler regions, with mean absolute errors on wind speed and direction < 2 m s−1 and 10° on average and <2.5 m s−1 and 15°–20° 90% of the time. These errors do not increase noticeably with wind speed, highlighting the suitability of these retrieved winds to be used for damaging and destructive wind detection and nowcasting. The single-Doppler retrieval using optical flow is also found to provide reasonably accurate winds at these heights. The accurate retrieval of convective-scale updrafts and downdrafts, even using multi-Doppler information, is still a major challenge, with mean absolute errors of vertical velocity of about 50% on average. This can be attributed to the limitations of the current radar technology used operationally, imposing slow antenna speeds.

Significance Statement

Damaging and destructive winds have the potential to inflict significant damage to properties and assets and, tragically, result in loss of life. Efficient direction of emergency services to affected areas is essential for a prompt return to normal conditions. Wind farm operators require precise information on anticipated wind shifts to reduce the risk of energy grid failures. Strong winds also contribute to compound weather events, such as water ingress through hail-damaged roofs or structural damage to buildings caused by hailstones. The purpose of this work was to equip Australia with the first operational wind monitoring system, based on operational radar observations, to serve all these critical applications (and more).

© 2024 American Meteorological Society. This published article is licensed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse of this content and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Alain Protat, alain.protat@bom.gov.au
Save
  • Bousquet, O., P. Tabary, and J. Parent du Châtelet, 2007: On the use of operationally synthesized multiple-Doppler wind fields. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L22813, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030464.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bousquet, O., P. Tabary, and J. Parent du Châtelet, 2008: Operational multiple-Doppler wind retrieval inferred from long range radial velocity measurements. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 47, 29292945, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAMC1878.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brook, J. P., A. Protat, J. Soderholm, J. T. Carlin, H. McGowan, and R. A. Warren, 2021: HailTrack–improving radar-based hailfall estimates by modelling hail trajectories. J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 60, 237254, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0087.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brook, J. P., A. Protat, J. S. Soderholm, R. A. Warren, and H. McGowan, 2022: A variational interpolation method for gridding weather radar data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 39, 16331654, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0015.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brook, J. P., A. Protat, C. K. Potvin, J. S. Soderholm, and H. McGowan, 2023: The effects of spatial interpolation on a novel, dual-Doppler 3D wind retrieval technique. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 40, 13251347, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-23-0004.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Browning, K. A., and R. Wexler, 1968: The determination of kinematic properties of a wind field using Doppler radar. J. Appl. Meteor., 7, 105113, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1968)007<0105:TDOKPO>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brox, T., A. Bruhn, N. Papenberg, and J. Weickert, 2004: High accuracy optical flow estimation based on a theory for warping. Computer Vision-ECCV 2004, T. Pajdla and J. Matas, Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3024, Springer, 25–36, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24673-2_3.

  • Byrd, A. D., R. D. Palmer, and C. J. Fulton, 2020: Development of a low-cost multistatic passive weather radar network. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 58, 27962808, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2955606.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cressman, G. P., 1959: An operational objective analysis system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 87, 367374, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1959)087<0367:AOOAS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hastings, D. A., and P. K. Dunbar, 1998: Development & assessment of the Global Land One-km Base Elevation digital elevation model (GLOBE). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 32, 218221.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laroche, S., and I. Zawadzki, 1994: A variational analysis method for retrieval of three-dimensional wind field from single-Doppler radar data. J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 26642682, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1994)051<2664:AVAMFR>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Laroche, S., and I. Zawadzki, 1995: Retrievals of horizontal winds from single-Doppler clear-air data by methods of cross-correlation and variational analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 721738, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1995)012<0721:ROHWFS>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lhermitte, R. M., and D. Atlas, 1961: Precipitation motion by pulse Doppler radar. Proc. Ninth Weather Radar Conf., Kansas City, MO, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 218–223.

  • Liou, Y.-C., and Y.-J. Chang, 2009: A variational multiple–Doppler radar three-dimensional wind synthesis method and its impacts on thermodynamic retrieval. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 39924010, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2980.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Liou, Y.-C., S.-F. Chang, and J. Sun, 2012: An application of the immersed boundary method for recovering the three-dimensional wind fields over complex terrain using multiple-Doppler radar data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 16031619, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-11-00151.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Louf, V., and A. Protat, 2023: Real-time monitoring of weather radar network calibration and antenna pointing. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 40, 823844, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-22-0118.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Oue, M., P. Kollias, A. Shapiro, A. Tatarevic, and T. Matsui, 2019: Investigation of observational error sources in multi-Doppler radar three-dimensional variational vertical air motion retrievals. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 19992018, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1999-2019.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Potvin, C. K., L. J. Wicker, and A. Shapiro, 2012: Assessing errors in variational dual-Doppler wind syntheses of supercell thunderstorms observed by storm-scale mobile radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 29, 10091025, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00177.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Powell, M. J. D., 1977: Some convergence procedures of the conjugate gradient method. Math. Program., 11, 4249, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580369.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Protat, A., and I. Zawadzki, 1999: A variational method for real-time retrieval of three-dimensional wind field from multiple-Doppler bistatic radar network data. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 16, 432449, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0432:AVMFRT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Protat, A., and I. Zawadzki, 2000: Optimization of dynamic retrievals from a multiple-Doppler radar network. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 17, 753760, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0753:OODRFA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Protat, A., Y. Lemaitre, and G. Scialom, 1997: Retrieval of kinematic fields using a single-beam airborne Doppler radar performing circular trajectories. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 14, 769791, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1997)014<0769:ROKFUA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Protat, A., V. Louf, and M. Curtis, 2023: A novel Doppler unfolding technique based on optical flow. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 40, 12631276, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-23-0057.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Scialom, G., and J. Testud, 1986: Retrieval of horizontal wind field and mesoscale vertical vorticity in stratiform precipitation by conical scannings with two Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 3, 693703, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1986)003<0693:ROHWFA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shapiro, A., C. K. Potvin, and J. Gao, 2009: Use of a vertical vorticity equation in variational dual-Doppler wind analysis. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 26, 20892106, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1256.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Soderholm, J., A. Protat, and C. Jakob, 2019: Australian Operational Weather Radar Level 1 dataset. National Computing Infrastructure, accessed 27 June 2024, https://doi.org/10.25914/508X-9A12.

  • Soderholm, J., V. Louf, J. Brook, and A. Protat, 2022: Australian Operational Weather Radar Level 1b dataset. National Computing Infrastructure, accessed 27 June 2024, https://doi.org/10.25914/40KE-NM05.

  • Srivastava, R. C., T. J. Matejka, and T. J. Lorello, 1986: Doppler radar study of the trailing anvil region associated with a squall line. J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 356377, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1986)043<0356:DRSOTT>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Testud, J., P. Amayenc, M. Chong, B. Nutten, and A. Sauvaget, 1980: A Doppler radar observation of a cold front: Three dimensional air circulation, related precipitation system and associated wave-like motions. J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 7898, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037<0078:ADROOA>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 17891807, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR2898.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wurman, J., S. Heckman, and D. Boccippio, 1993: A bistatic multiple-Doppler radar network. J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 18021814, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1993)032<1802:ABMDRN>2.0.CO;2.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Wurman, J., and Coauthors, 2021: The Flexible Array of Radars and Mesonets (FARM). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 102, E1499E1525, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0285.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Xue, M., M. Hu, and A. D. Schenkman, 2014: Numerical prediction of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and embedded tornado using ARPS with the assimilation of WSR-88D data. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 3962, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00029.1.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1616 1616 77
Full Text Views 541 541 460
PDF Downloads 96 96 13