Comparison of Equatorial Winds as Measured by Cup and Propeller Anemometers

H. Paul Freitag Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by H. Paul Freitag in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael J. McPhaden Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Michael J. McPhaden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Andrew J. Shepherd Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington

Search for other papers by Andrew J. Shepherd in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

This study compares the performance of cup vs. propeller anemometers from surface-following taut-line moorings in the equatorial Pacific. Vector wind components at 4 m above the sea surface were measured from a mooring instrumented with a cup anemometer and concurrently from a nearby mooring instrumented with a propeller anemometer. Mean wind conditions over the 115-day comparison period were typical of the southeast trade winds with a mean speed of 6.7 m s−1 and a steadiness factor of 0.96. Differences between the time series measured by the two wind sensors were small. Mean speed differed by 0.02 m s−1 and mean direction by 1.4°. Correlation coefficients for 2-hour vector-averaged zonal component, meridional component, speed and direction were 0.97 or above. The small differences in measurements imply that the two systems are equally suited for near-surface wind observations under typical tradewind conditions.

Abstract

This study compares the performance of cup vs. propeller anemometers from surface-following taut-line moorings in the equatorial Pacific. Vector wind components at 4 m above the sea surface were measured from a mooring instrumented with a cup anemometer and concurrently from a nearby mooring instrumented with a propeller anemometer. Mean wind conditions over the 115-day comparison period were typical of the southeast trade winds with a mean speed of 6.7 m s−1 and a steadiness factor of 0.96. Differences between the time series measured by the two wind sensors were small. Mean speed differed by 0.02 m s−1 and mean direction by 1.4°. Correlation coefficients for 2-hour vector-averaged zonal component, meridional component, speed and direction were 0.97 or above. The small differences in measurements imply that the two systems are equally suited for near-surface wind observations under typical tradewind conditions.

Save