Field and Laboratory Comparisons of Two Cloud Condensation Nuclei Counters

E. K. Bigg CSIRO, Division of Atmospheric Physics, Epping, Australia

Search for other papers by E. K. Bigg in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A. D. Kaye Centre for Research on Experimental Space Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by A. D. Kaye in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
W. J. Megaw Department of Physics and Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by W. J. Megaw in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

An extensive series of experiments was carried out to compare the performance of two cloud nucleus counters, a Static Diffusion Chamber and a Thermal Diffusion Tube, operating under quite different principles, in a wide range of field conditions and with a number of laboratory aerosols. The operating ranges of the instruments only overlap slightly; nevertheless the supersaturation vs cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration spectra obtained showed rather good agreement at the range boundaries and suggest that use of the two instruments would provide a viable method of obtaining CCN concentrations in the supersaturation range 0.04 to 1.25 percent.

Abstract

An extensive series of experiments was carried out to compare the performance of two cloud nucleus counters, a Static Diffusion Chamber and a Thermal Diffusion Tube, operating under quite different principles, in a wide range of field conditions and with a number of laboratory aerosols. The operating ranges of the instruments only overlap slightly; nevertheless the supersaturation vs cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentration spectra obtained showed rather good agreement at the range boundaries and suggest that use of the two instruments would provide a viable method of obtaining CCN concentrations in the supersaturation range 0.04 to 1.25 percent.

Save