Shear and temperature microstructure measurements from APEX Floats

Arnaud Le Boyer a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by Arnaud Le Boyer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C. Andrew Parlier a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by C. Andrew Parlier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael Goldin a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by Michael Goldin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sean Lastuka a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by Sean Lastuka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sara Goheen a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by Sara Goheen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S. Nguyen a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by S. Nguyen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dana Swift b School of Oceanography, University of Washington

Search for other papers by Dana Swift in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steve Riser b School of Oceanography, University of Washington

Search for other papers by Steve Riser in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alison Gray b School of Oceanography, University of Washington

Search for other papers by Alison Gray in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Matthew H. Alford a Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego

Search for other papers by Matthew H. Alford in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Temperature and shear microstructure data were collected by the epsilometer, a custom turbulence package, integrated onto a Teledyne-Webb APEX float. Profiles were conducted in both a controlled-ascent mode similar to the Argo mission (∼ 0.08 m s−1 rise rate) and at the float’s maximum rise rate of ∼ 0.3 m s−1, which might be used for shorter missions supporting process studies. In both modes, profiles of turbulent dissipation rate of kinetic energy ε and thermal dissipation rate χ were computed. Valid ε profiles were obtained in both profiling modes, though platform vibration was significant at the faster ascent rate, and probe sensitivity was reduced at the slower rise rate. Shear spectra resolve the viscous roll-off well, giving a noise floor for ε of about 3×10−10 W kg−1 in both modes. Individual temperature spectra also resolve the diffusive roll-off for χ about 2×10−11 K2 s−1 despite the presence of significant finescale structure in temperature, which impacted the quality of the temperature gradient spectra at low wavenumber. Following published best practices, each ε and χ estimate was kept or rejected based on a figure of merit measuring the goodness of fit of the measured spectrum to the theoretical form. ε cannot be computed when the buoyancy pump is active (3% of the time) due to excessive vibrations. At other times, about >65% and 75% of raw estimates of the turbulent dissipation rates ε and χ met our quality-control criteria, respectively.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Arnaud Le Boyer, aleboyer@ucsd.edu

Abstract

Temperature and shear microstructure data were collected by the epsilometer, a custom turbulence package, integrated onto a Teledyne-Webb APEX float. Profiles were conducted in both a controlled-ascent mode similar to the Argo mission (∼ 0.08 m s−1 rise rate) and at the float’s maximum rise rate of ∼ 0.3 m s−1, which might be used for shorter missions supporting process studies. In both modes, profiles of turbulent dissipation rate of kinetic energy ε and thermal dissipation rate χ were computed. Valid ε profiles were obtained in both profiling modes, though platform vibration was significant at the faster ascent rate, and probe sensitivity was reduced at the slower rise rate. Shear spectra resolve the viscous roll-off well, giving a noise floor for ε of about 3×10−10 W kg−1 in both modes. Individual temperature spectra also resolve the diffusive roll-off for χ about 2×10−11 K2 s−1 despite the presence of significant finescale structure in temperature, which impacted the quality of the temperature gradient spectra at low wavenumber. Following published best practices, each ε and χ estimate was kept or rejected based on a figure of merit measuring the goodness of fit of the measured spectrum to the theoretical form. ε cannot be computed when the buoyancy pump is active (3% of the time) due to excessive vibrations. At other times, about >65% and 75% of raw estimates of the turbulent dissipation rates ε and χ met our quality-control criteria, respectively.

© 2025 American Meteorological Society. This is an Author Accepted Manuscript distributed under the terms of the default AMS reuse license. For information regarding reuse and general copyright information, consult the AMS Copyright Policy (www.ametsoc.org/PUBSReuseLicenses).

Corresponding author: Arnaud Le Boyer, aleboyer@ucsd.edu
Save