Measurement of the Velocity Field in a Simulated Tornado-Like Vortex Using a Three-Dimensional Velocity Probe

C. A. Wan Dept. of Aerospace and Atmospheric Sciences, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20017

Search for other papers by C. A. Wan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
C. C. Chang Dept. of Aerospace and Atmospheric Sciences, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 20017

Search for other papers by C. C. Chang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

A three-dimensional velocity probe, incorporating hot-film anemometry, is developed to study the mean flow field of a simulated turbulent tornado-like vortex interacting with a smooth, flat boundary. The flow characteristics are essentially controlled by a dimensionless parameter εc and a Reynolds number Ret. The parameter is the ratio of sink strength to the product of the free-stream circulation and the vortex core radius. Flow fields for two different εc (0.022 and 0.51) are studied, with Ret>105 in both cases. It is found that. 1) the tangential velocity profiles at more than three core radii from the axis are similar to those of a turbulent flow over a flat plate; 2) the radial velocity close to the boundary is directed inward due to a positive radial pressure gradient, while it changes direction and approaches a constant at a height of two core radii from the boundary; 3) the vertical velocity depends strongly on εc, and is directed downward near the vortex axis in case 1 and upward in case 2, the magnitude of the vertical velocity becoming quite small far from the axis in both cases; 4) the streamline pattern in the meridian plane has a two-celled structure for case 1 and a one-celled structure for case 2; 5) as a result of radial and axial flow, the circulation distribution is appreciably different from that of a potential vortex due to the stretching of the vortex tube; 6) zones of maximum wind speed form an annular region near the ground boundary; and 7) the maximum pressure drop, occurring at the axis, exceeds twice the core dynamic head for case 1 and 15 times for case 2 due to higher sink strength.

Velocity data obtained from a real tornado are compared with the present results. Good agreement was found with case 2.

Abstract

A three-dimensional velocity probe, incorporating hot-film anemometry, is developed to study the mean flow field of a simulated turbulent tornado-like vortex interacting with a smooth, flat boundary. The flow characteristics are essentially controlled by a dimensionless parameter εc and a Reynolds number Ret. The parameter is the ratio of sink strength to the product of the free-stream circulation and the vortex core radius. Flow fields for two different εc (0.022 and 0.51) are studied, with Ret>105 in both cases. It is found that. 1) the tangential velocity profiles at more than three core radii from the axis are similar to those of a turbulent flow over a flat plate; 2) the radial velocity close to the boundary is directed inward due to a positive radial pressure gradient, while it changes direction and approaches a constant at a height of two core radii from the boundary; 3) the vertical velocity depends strongly on εc, and is directed downward near the vortex axis in case 1 and upward in case 2, the magnitude of the vertical velocity becoming quite small far from the axis in both cases; 4) the streamline pattern in the meridian plane has a two-celled structure for case 1 and a one-celled structure for case 2; 5) as a result of radial and axial flow, the circulation distribution is appreciably different from that of a potential vortex due to the stretching of the vortex tube; 6) zones of maximum wind speed form an annular region near the ground boundary; and 7) the maximum pressure drop, occurring at the axis, exceeds twice the core dynamic head for case 1 and 15 times for case 2 due to higher sink strength.

Velocity data obtained from a real tornado are compared with the present results. Good agreement was found with case 2.

Save