Cloud-to-Ground Lightning Versus Radar Reflectivity in Oklahoma Thunderstorms

Gilbert D. Kinzer National Severe Storms Laboratory, Norman, Okla. 73069

Search for other papers by Gilbert D. Kinzer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Sferic pulse-train amplitudes and arrival times were used to locate lightning flashes and correlate cloud-to-ground (C–G) lightning with radar reflectivity in two typical Oklahoma storm systems. One system was a squall line lasting about 6 hr and producing detailed azimuthal displays of at least six individual storms with C–G lightning. The second system was a group of weaker air mass thunderstorms lasting about 3 hr. Although lightning counts per unit time varied widely between storms and within the same storm, the correlation of lightning counts with the radial extent of radar reflectivity factors ≥550 mm6 m−3 was fair. A rough correlation existed between C–G lightning counts and the amount of rainfall. The overall average rate of one cloud-to-ground flash per 1.6 × 1010 gm of rainfall found in a limited number of storms compares with Battan's report of one flash per 3 × 1010 gm. Even though there was some uncertainty about the rainfall measurements, the Oklahoma results support the opinion that in a developing thunderstorm the number of C–G flashes increases more rapidly than the rainfall.

Abstract

Sferic pulse-train amplitudes and arrival times were used to locate lightning flashes and correlate cloud-to-ground (C–G) lightning with radar reflectivity in two typical Oklahoma storm systems. One system was a squall line lasting about 6 hr and producing detailed azimuthal displays of at least six individual storms with C–G lightning. The second system was a group of weaker air mass thunderstorms lasting about 3 hr. Although lightning counts per unit time varied widely between storms and within the same storm, the correlation of lightning counts with the radial extent of radar reflectivity factors ≥550 mm6 m−3 was fair. A rough correlation existed between C–G lightning counts and the amount of rainfall. The overall average rate of one cloud-to-ground flash per 1.6 × 1010 gm of rainfall found in a limited number of storms compares with Battan's report of one flash per 3 × 1010 gm. Even though there was some uncertainty about the rainfall measurements, the Oklahoma results support the opinion that in a developing thunderstorm the number of C–G flashes increases more rapidly than the rainfall.

Save