The Delta–M Method: Rapid Yet Accurate Radiative Flux Calculations for Strongly Asymmetric Phase Functions

W. J. Wiscombe National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colo. 80307

Search for other papers by W. J. Wiscombe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The delta–M method represents a natural extension of the recently proposed delta–Eddington approximation to all orders M of angular approximation. It relies essentially on matching the first 2M phase function moments and using a Dirac delta–function representation of forward scattering. Computed fluxes are remarkably accurate at very low orders M of approximation, even when the phase function is strongly asymmetric; thus the associated M × M matrix computations remain small and manageable. Flux is automatically conserved, making phase function “renormalization” unnecessary. Phase function truncation is effected in a much more attractive manner than in the past; furthermore, truncation tends to zero as M → ∞. Errors are shown to oscillate with (roughly) exponentially decreasing amplitude as M increases; which has the curious consequence that increasing M by small amounts does not necessarily reduce error. Mie computations associated with the δ–M method can be considerably reduced, based on a simple technique for phase function moment calculations proposed herein.

Abstract

The delta–M method represents a natural extension of the recently proposed delta–Eddington approximation to all orders M of angular approximation. It relies essentially on matching the first 2M phase function moments and using a Dirac delta–function representation of forward scattering. Computed fluxes are remarkably accurate at very low orders M of approximation, even when the phase function is strongly asymmetric; thus the associated M × M matrix computations remain small and manageable. Flux is automatically conserved, making phase function “renormalization” unnecessary. Phase function truncation is effected in a much more attractive manner than in the past; furthermore, truncation tends to zero as M → ∞. Errors are shown to oscillate with (roughly) exponentially decreasing amplitude as M increases; which has the curious consequence that increasing M by small amounts does not necessarily reduce error. Mie computations associated with the δ–M method can be considerably reduced, based on a simple technique for phase function moment calculations proposed herein.

Save