Friction- and Mountain-Torque Estimates from Global Atmospheric Data

John M. Wahr Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Program and Department of Geological and Geophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544

Search for other papers by John M. Wahr in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Abraham H. Oort Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, NOAA, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542

Search for other papers by Abraham H. Oort in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

Seasonal, zonal surface torques between the atmosphere and the earth are estimated and compared, using data from a number of independent sources. The mountain torque is computed both from surface pressure data and from isobaric height data. The friction torque is estimated from the oceanic stress data of Hellerman and Rosenstein. Results for the total torque are inferred from atmospheric angular momentum data. Finally, the globally integrated total torque is compared with astronomical observations of the earth's rotation rate. These comparisons help us to assess the quality of the different results.

Zonal torques are also computed using results from a GFDL general circulation model of the atmosphere. A comparison with the corresponding results inferred from real data is presented and interpreted in terms of model accuracy.

Abstract

Seasonal, zonal surface torques between the atmosphere and the earth are estimated and compared, using data from a number of independent sources. The mountain torque is computed both from surface pressure data and from isobaric height data. The friction torque is estimated from the oceanic stress data of Hellerman and Rosenstein. Results for the total torque are inferred from atmospheric angular momentum data. Finally, the globally integrated total torque is compared with astronomical observations of the earth's rotation rate. These comparisons help us to assess the quality of the different results.

Zonal torques are also computed using results from a GFDL general circulation model of the atmosphere. A comparison with the corresponding results inferred from real data is presented and interpreted in terms of model accuracy.

Save