A Mechanism for Observed Interannual Variabilities over the Equatorial Indian Ocean

Prashant Goswami Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation, Bangalore, India

Search for other papers by Prashant Goswami in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Nandini Harinath Council of Scientific and Industrial Research Centre for Mathematical Modelling and Computer Simulation, Bangalore, India

Search for other papers by Nandini Harinath in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A mechanism is proposed that can give rise to a sustained interannual variability of sea surface temperature (SST) and other variables even over an ocean basin of small zonal extent such as the Indian Ocean, as observed. A simple one-dimensional ocean–atmosphere coupled climate model with “minimal” dynamics is considered to isolate and emphasize the basic physical mechanism. In particular, unlike in the conventional scenario of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, the equatorial Rossby waves are not included in the dynamics of the model. However, although the dynamics is minimal, the model as a whole is nonlinear due to the nonlinear parameterization of the atmospheric heating. It is shown that even with this minimal dynamics the model exhibits interannual variabilities for appropriate air–sea interaction. Further, in the one-dimensional case a basic factor that suppresses variability over the smaller basins is the zonal extent of the ocean basin. For an ocean-covered globe and for two basins of equal size separated by a land strip, the model shows interannual variability of about 5-yr period over both the eastern and the western sector (or basins). For two unequal ocean basins, with zonal extents representative of the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, only the larger basin shows sustained interannual oscillations. However, the observed interannual viability over the smaller (Indian Ocean) basin can be recovered if evaporation–wind feedback is included in the modeling of air–sea interaction. The phase relationship of the two oscillations, on the other hand, is affected by both basin geometry and moist feedback. Thus, it is proposed that both basin geometry and ocean–atmosphere coupling in the presence of moist feedbacks are essential to account for the observed structure and distribution of interannual variabilities in the Tropics.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Prashant Goswami, C-MMACS, Bangalore, 560 037 India.

Abstract

A mechanism is proposed that can give rise to a sustained interannual variability of sea surface temperature (SST) and other variables even over an ocean basin of small zonal extent such as the Indian Ocean, as observed. A simple one-dimensional ocean–atmosphere coupled climate model with “minimal” dynamics is considered to isolate and emphasize the basic physical mechanism. In particular, unlike in the conventional scenario of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation, the equatorial Rossby waves are not included in the dynamics of the model. However, although the dynamics is minimal, the model as a whole is nonlinear due to the nonlinear parameterization of the atmospheric heating. It is shown that even with this minimal dynamics the model exhibits interannual variabilities for appropriate air–sea interaction. Further, in the one-dimensional case a basic factor that suppresses variability over the smaller basins is the zonal extent of the ocean basin. For an ocean-covered globe and for two basins of equal size separated by a land strip, the model shows interannual variability of about 5-yr period over both the eastern and the western sector (or basins). For two unequal ocean basins, with zonal extents representative of the Indian Ocean and the Pacific Ocean, only the larger basin shows sustained interannual oscillations. However, the observed interannual viability over the smaller (Indian Ocean) basin can be recovered if evaporation–wind feedback is included in the modeling of air–sea interaction. The phase relationship of the two oscillations, on the other hand, is affected by both basin geometry and moist feedback. Thus, it is proposed that both basin geometry and ocean–atmosphere coupling in the presence of moist feedbacks are essential to account for the observed structure and distribution of interannual variabilities in the Tropics.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Prashant Goswami, C-MMACS, Bangalore, 560 037 India.

Save
  • Anderson, D. L. T., and J. P. McCreary, 1985: On the role of the Indian Ocean in a coupled ocean–atmosphere model of El Niño and the Southern Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 2439–2442.

  • Barnett, T. P., 1985: Variations in near-global sea level pressure. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 478–501.

  • Battisti, D. S., and A. C. Hirst, 1989: Interannual variability in a tropical atmosphere–ocean model: Influence of the basic state, ocean geometry and nonlinearity. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1687–1712.

  • Bjerknes, J., 1969: Atmospheric teleconnections from the equatorial Pacific. Mon. Wea. Rev.,97, 163–172.

  • Cane, M. A., and S. E. Zebiak, 1985: A theory for El Niño and the Southern Oscillation. Science,228, 1084–1087.

  • Chang, H-R., and P. J. Webster, 1995: Studying the mechanisms of international variability with a coupled ocean–atmosphere model. Extended Abstracts, TOGA 95 Int. Conf., Melbourne, Australia, TOGA, 147.

  • Goswami, P., and B. N. Goswami, 1991: Modification of n = 0 equatorial waves due to interaction between convection and dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2231–2244.

  • Hirst, A. C., 1988: Slow instabilities in tropical ocean basin–global atmospheric models. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 830–852.

  • Horel, J. D., 1982: The annual cycle in the tropical Pacific atmosphere and ocean. Mon. Wea. Rev.,110, 1863–1878.

  • Krishnamurti, T. N., S. H. Chu, and W. Iglesian, 1986: On the sea level pressures of the Southern Oscillation. Arch. Meteor. Geophys. Bioclimatol. Ser. A,34, 385–425.

  • Lau, K. M., 1981: Oscillation in a simple equatorial climate system. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 248–261.

  • ——, and S. Shen, 1988: On the dynamics of intraseasonal oscillation and ENSO. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1781–1797.

  • Lau, N. C., S. G. H. Philander, and M. J. Nath, 1992: Simulation of low ENSO-like phenomena with a resolution coupled GCM of the global ocean and atmosphere. J. Climate,5, 284–307.

  • Miller, R. L., and X. J. Jiang, 1995: Surface heat fluxes and coupled variabilities in the Tropics of a coupled general circulation model. Extended Abstracts, TOGA 95 Int. Conf., Melbourne, Australia, TOGA, 328.

  • Neelin, J. D., 1991: The slow sea surface temperature mode and the fast wave limit: Analytic theory for tropical interannual oscillations and experiments in a hybrid coupled model. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 584–606.

  • ——, and I. M. Held 1987: Modeling tropical convergence based on the moist static energy budget. Mon. Wea. Rev.,115, 3–12.

  • Nigam, S., and H. S. Shen, 1993: Structure of oceanic and atmospheric low frequency variability over the tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans. Part I: COADS observations. J. Climate,6, 657–677.

  • Philander, S. G. H., 1992: Ocean–atmosphere interaction in the tropics: A review of recent theories and models. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 938–945.

  • Schopf, P. S., and M. J. Suarez, 1988: A delayed action oscillator for ENSO. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 3283–3287.

  • Tourre, Y. M., and W. B. White, 1995: ENSO signals in global upper ocean temperatures. Extended Abstracts, TOGA 95 Int. Conf., Melbourne, Australia, TOGA, 119–120.

  • Yasunari, T., 1987: Global structure of the El-Niño/Southern Oscillation. Part I: El-Niño composites. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,65, 65–80.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1195 985 36
PDF Downloads 55 27 1