Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Parameterizing Grid-Averaged Longwave Fluxes for Inhomogeneous Marine Boundary Layer Clouds

Howard W. Barker Cloud Physics Research Division, Atmospheric Environment Service, Downsview, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by Howard W. Barker in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Bruce A. Wielicki Atmospheric Sciences Division, NASA/Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia

Search for other papers by Bruce A. Wielicki in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Dec 1997
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054<2785:PGALFF>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2785–2798
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

This paper examines the relative impacts on grid-averaged longwave flux transmittance (emittance) for marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud fields arising from horizontal variability of optical depth τ and cloud sides. First, using fields of Landsat-inferred τ and a Monte Carlo photon transport algorithm, it is demonstrated that mean all-sky transmittances for 3D variable MBL clouds can be computed accurately by the conventional method of linearly weighting clear and cloudy transmittances by their respective sky fractions. Then, the approximations of decoupling cloud and radiative properties and assuming independent columns are shown to be adequate for computation of mean flux transmittance.

Since real clouds have nonzero geometric thicknesses, cloud fractions Âc presented to isotropic beams usually exceed the more familiar vertically projected cloud fractions Ac. It is shown, however, that when Ac ≲ 0.9, biases for all-sky transmittance stemming from use of Ac as opposed to Âc are roughly 2–5 times smaller than, and opposite in sign to, biases due to neglect of horizontal variability of τ. By neglecting variable τ, all-sky transmittances are underestimated often by more than 0.1 for Ac near 0.75 and this translates into relative errors that can exceed 40% (corresponding errors for all-sky emittance are about 20% for most values of Ac). Thus, priority should be given to development of general circulation model (GCM) parameterizations that account for the effects of horizontal variations in unresolved τ; effects of cloud sides are of secondary importance.

On this note, an efficient stochastic model for computing grid-averaged cloudy-sky flux transmittances is furnished that assumes that distributions of τ, for regions comparable in size to GCM grid cells, can be described adequately by gamma distribution functions. While the plane-parallel, homogeneous model underestimates cloud transmittance by about an order of magnitude when 3D variable cloud transmittances are ≲ 0.2 and by ∼20% to 100% otherwise, the stochastic model reduces these biases often by more than 80%.

Corresponding author address: Howard Barker, Atmospheric Environment Service, Cloud Physics Research Division (ARMP), 4905 Dufferin St., Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada.

Abstract

This paper examines the relative impacts on grid-averaged longwave flux transmittance (emittance) for marine boundary layer (MBL) cloud fields arising from horizontal variability of optical depth τ and cloud sides. First, using fields of Landsat-inferred τ and a Monte Carlo photon transport algorithm, it is demonstrated that mean all-sky transmittances for 3D variable MBL clouds can be computed accurately by the conventional method of linearly weighting clear and cloudy transmittances by their respective sky fractions. Then, the approximations of decoupling cloud and radiative properties and assuming independent columns are shown to be adequate for computation of mean flux transmittance.

Since real clouds have nonzero geometric thicknesses, cloud fractions Âc presented to isotropic beams usually exceed the more familiar vertically projected cloud fractions Ac. It is shown, however, that when Ac ≲ 0.9, biases for all-sky transmittance stemming from use of Ac as opposed to Âc are roughly 2–5 times smaller than, and opposite in sign to, biases due to neglect of horizontal variability of τ. By neglecting variable τ, all-sky transmittances are underestimated often by more than 0.1 for Ac near 0.75 and this translates into relative errors that can exceed 40% (corresponding errors for all-sky emittance are about 20% for most values of Ac). Thus, priority should be given to development of general circulation model (GCM) parameterizations that account for the effects of horizontal variations in unresolved τ; effects of cloud sides are of secondary importance.

On this note, an efficient stochastic model for computing grid-averaged cloudy-sky flux transmittances is furnished that assumes that distributions of τ, for regions comparable in size to GCM grid cells, can be described adequately by gamma distribution functions. While the plane-parallel, homogeneous model underestimates cloud transmittance by about an order of magnitude when 3D variable cloud transmittances are ≲ 0.2 and by ∼20% to 100% otherwise, the stochastic model reduces these biases often by more than 80%.

Corresponding author address: Howard Barker, Atmospheric Environment Service, Cloud Physics Research Division (ARMP), 4905 Dufferin St., Downsview, ON M3H 5T4, Canada.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Abramowitz, M., and I. A. Stegun, 1964: Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Applied Mathematicals Series, Vol. 55, Washington Bureau of Standards. (Reprinted, Dover, 1968).

  • Arfken, G., 1970: Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press, 815 pp.

  • Avaste, O. A., Y. R. Mullamaa, K. Y. Niylisk, and M. A. Sulev, 1974:On the coverage of the sky by clouds. Heat Transfer in the Atmosphere, Ye. M. Feygel’son and L. R. Tsvang, Eds., NASA Tech. Trans. NASA TT-F-790, 173–181.

  • Barker, H. W., 1992: Solar radiative transfer for clouds possessing isotropic variable extinction coefficient. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 1145–1162.

  • ——, 1996: A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer clouds. Part I:Methodology and homogeneous biases. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2289–2303.

  • ——, and D. Liu, 1995: Inferring optical depth of broken clouds from Landsat data. J. Climate,8, 2620–2630.

  • ——, S. R. Pal, and A. I. Carswell, 1993: Infrared flux transmittances for inhomogeneous cirrus clouds. IAMAP Int. Radiation Symp. 1992, S. Keevallik and O. Karner, Eds., Deepak, 145–149.

  • ——, B. A. Wielicki, and L. Parker, 1996: A parameterization for computing grid-averaged solar fluxes for inhomogeneous marine boundary layer clouds. Part II: Validation using satellite data. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2304–2316.

  • Cahalan, R. F., 1991: Landsat analysis of fractal cloud structure. Non- Linear Variability in Geophysics, D. Schertzer and S. Lovejoy, Eds., Kluwer, 281–295.

  • ——, and J. B. Snider 1989: Marine stratocumulus structure. Remote Sens. Environ.,28, 95–107.

  • ——, W. Ridgway, W. J. Wiscombe, T. L. Bell, and J. B. Snider, 1994a: The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2434–2455.

  • ——, ——, ——, S. Golmer, and Harshvardhan, 1994b: Independent pixel and Monte Carlo estimates of stratocumulus albedo. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3776–3790.

  • Chambers, L. H., B. A. Wielicki, and K. F. Evans, 1997: Accuracy of the independent pixel approximation for satellite estimates of oceanic boundary layer cloud optical depth. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 1779–1794.

  • Charlock, T., and B. M. Herman, 1976: Discussion of the Elsasser formulation for infrared fluxes. J. Appl. Meteor.,15, 657–661.

  • Coakley, J. A., Jr., and F. P Bretherton, 1982: Cloud cover from high resolution scanner data: Detecting and allowing for partially filled fields of view. J. Geophys. Res.,87, 4917–4932.

  • Considine, G. D., J. A. Curry, and B. A. Wielicki, 1997: Modeling cloud fraction and horizontal variability in marine boundary layer clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 13517–13525.

  • Davis, A., P. Gabriel, S. Lovejoy, D. Schertzer, and G. Austin, 1990:Discrete angle radiative transfer—Part III: Numerical results and applications. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 11729–11742.

  • Ellingson, R. G., 1982: On the effects of cumulus dimensions on longwave irradiance and heating rate calculations. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 886–896.

  • Elsasser, W. M., 1942: Heat Transfer by Infrared Radiation in the Atmosphere. Harvard Meteor. Studies, No. 6, Harvard University Press, 107 pp.

  • Evans, K. F., 1993: Two-dimensional radiative transfer in cloudy atmospheres: The spherical harmonic spatial grid method. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3111–3124.

  • Gradshteyn, I. S., and I. M. Ryzhik, 1980: Table of Integrals, Series,and Products: Corrected and Enlarged Edition. Academic Press, 1160 pp.

  • Han, Q., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1994: Near-global survey of effective radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data. J. Climate,7, 465–497.

  • Harshvardhan, J. A. Weinman, and R. Davies, 1981: Transport of infrared radiation in cuboidal clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 2500–2513.

  • ——, B. A. Wielicki, and K. M. Ginger, 1994: The interpretation of remotely sensed cloud properties from a model parameterization perspective. J. Climate,7, 1987–1998.

  • Hu, Y. X., and K. Stamnes, 1993: An accurate parameterization of the radiative properties of water clouds suitable for use in climate models. J. Climate,6, 728–742.

  • Loeb, N. G., and J. A. Coakley Jr., 1997: Inference of marine stratus cloud optical depths from satellite measurements: Does 1D theory apply? J. Climate, in press.

  • Luo, G., X. Lin, and J. A. Coakley Jr., 1994: 11 μm emissivities and droplet radii for marine stratocumulus. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 3685–3698.

  • Minnis, P., P. W. Heck, D. F. Young, C. W. Fairall, and J. B. Snider, 1992: Stratocumulus cloud properties derived from simultaneous satellite and island-based instrumentation during FIRE. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 317–339.

  • Otterman, J., 1984: Albedo of a forest modeled as a plane with dense protrusions. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,23, 297–307.

  • Plank, V. G., 1969: The size distribution of cumulus clouds in representative Florida populations. J. Appl. Meteor.,8, 46–67.

  • Quanhau, L., and J. Schmetz, 1987: On the problem of an analytic solution to the diffusivity factor. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,61, 23–29.

  • Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.

  • Schertzer, D., and S. Lovejoy, 1987: Physical modelling and analysis of rain and clouds by anisotropic scaling multiplicative processes. J. Geophys. Res.,92, 9693–9714.

  • Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation profiles in extended water clouds. II: Parameterization schemes. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2123–2332.

  • ——, 1988: Radiative transfer through arbitrarily shaped optical media. Part II: Group theory and simple closures. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1837–1848.

  • Welch, R. M., and B. A. Wielicki, 1984: Stratocumulus cloud field reflected fluxes: The effect of cloud shape. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 3085–3103.

  • Wielicki, B. A., and R. M. Welch, 1986: Cumulus cloud properties using Landsat satellite data. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,25, 261–276.

  • ——, and L. Parker, 1992: The determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 12799–12823.

  • ——, and ——, 1994: Frequency distributions of cloud liquid water path in oceanic boundary layer cloud as a function of regional cloud fraction. Preprints, Eighth Conf. on Atmospheric Radiation, Nashville, TN, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 415–417.

  • Wylie, D. P., W. P. Menzel, H. W. Woolf, and K. L. Strabala, 1994: Four years of global cirrus cloud Statistics using HIRS. J. Climate,7, 1972–1986.

  • Zuev, V. E., and G. A. Titov, 1995: Radiative transfer in cloud fields with random geometry. J. Atmos. Sci,52, 176–190.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 401 177 77
PDF Downloads 64 28 1