Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

A Three-Dimensional Radiative Transfer Model to Investigate the Solar Radiation within a Cloudy Atmosphere. Part I: Spatial Effects

William O’Hirok Institute for Computational Earth System Science and Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California

Search for other papers by William O’Hirok in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Catherine Gautier Institute for Computational Earth System Science and Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California

Search for other papers by Catherine Gautier in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Jun 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2162:ATDRTM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2162–2179
Restricted access

Abstract

A new Monte Carlo–based three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer model of high spectral and spatial resolution is presented. It is used to investigate the difference in broadband solar radiation absorption, top-of-the-atmosphere upwelling, and surface downwelling solar radiation in a cloudy atmosphere between 3D and 1D calculations. Spatial variations of these same radiation components (absorption, upwelling, and downwelling), together with pathlength distributions, are analyzed for different wavelengths to describe the main physical mechanisms at work.

The model contains all of the important atmospheric and surface radiative constituents. It includes Rayleigh scattering, absorption and scattering by both cloud droplets and aerosols, and absorption by the major atmospheric gases. Inputs include 3D liquid water fields, aerosols, and gas distribution, type, and concentrations.

Using satellite imagery of a tropical cloud field as input, model results demonstrate that various plane-parallel (1D) assumptions can underestimate atmospheric absorption when compared to 3D computations. This discrepancy is caused by a complex interaction of gaseous absorption, cloud droplet absorption, and the solar zenith angle. Through a sensitivity analysis, the authors demonstrate that the most important factor is the morphology of the cloud field, followed by the vertical stratification of water vapor.

Corresponding author address: Dr. William O’Hirok, ICESS, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3060.

Abstract

A new Monte Carlo–based three-dimensional (3D) radiative transfer model of high spectral and spatial resolution is presented. It is used to investigate the difference in broadband solar radiation absorption, top-of-the-atmosphere upwelling, and surface downwelling solar radiation in a cloudy atmosphere between 3D and 1D calculations. Spatial variations of these same radiation components (absorption, upwelling, and downwelling), together with pathlength distributions, are analyzed for different wavelengths to describe the main physical mechanisms at work.

The model contains all of the important atmospheric and surface radiative constituents. It includes Rayleigh scattering, absorption and scattering by both cloud droplets and aerosols, and absorption by the major atmospheric gases. Inputs include 3D liquid water fields, aerosols, and gas distribution, type, and concentrations.

Using satellite imagery of a tropical cloud field as input, model results demonstrate that various plane-parallel (1D) assumptions can underestimate atmospheric absorption when compared to 3D computations. This discrepancy is caused by a complex interaction of gaseous absorption, cloud droplet absorption, and the solar zenith angle. Through a sensitivity analysis, the authors demonstrate that the most important factor is the morphology of the cloud field, followed by the vertical stratification of water vapor.

Corresponding author address: Dr. William O’Hirok, ICESS, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-3060.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Aida, M. A., 1977: Scattering of solar radiation as a function of cloud dimension and orientation. Quat. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer,17, 303–310.

  • Barker, H. W., and J. A. Davies, 1992: Solar radiative fluxes for broken cloud fields above reflecting surfaces. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 749–761.

  • Bower, K. N., T. W. Choularton, J. Latham, J. Nelson, M. B. Baker, and J. Jensen, 1994: A parameterization of warm clouds for use in atmospheric general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2722–2732.

  • Bréon, F., 1992: Reflectance of broken cloud fields: Simulation and parameterization. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1221–1232.

  • Byrne, R. N., R. C. K. Somerville, and B. Subasilar, 1996: Broken-cloud enhancement of solar radiation absorption. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 878–886.

  • Cahalan, R. F., W. Ridgway, W. J. Wiscombe, S. Gollmer, and Harshvardhan, 1994: Independent pixel and Monte Carlo estimates of stratocumulus albedo. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 3776–3790.

  • Cashwell, E. D., and C. J. Everett, 1959: A Practical Manual on the Monte Carlo Method for Random Walk Problems. Pergamon Press, 153 pp.

  • Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1995: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Observations versus models. Science,267, 496–499.

  • ——, M. H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, X. Jing, and V. Dvortsov, 1996: Absorption of solar radiation by clouds: Interpretations of satellite, surface, and aircraft measurements. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 23 299–23 309.

  • Claußen, M., 1982: On the radiative interaction in three-dimensional cloud fields. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,55, 158–169.

  • Coakley, J. A., and R. Davies, 1986: The effect of cloud sides on reflected solar radiation as deduced from satellite observations. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 1025–1035.

  • ——, and T. Kobayashi, 1989: Broken cloud biases in albedo and surface insolation derived from satellite imagery data. J. Climate,2, 721–730.

  • Davies, R., 1978: The effect of finite geometry on the three-dimensional transfer of solar irradiance in clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1259–1266.

  • ——, W. L. Ridgway, and K. Kim, 1984: Spectral absorption of solar radiation in cloudy atmospheres: A 20 cm−1 model. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2126–2137.

  • Deirmendjian, D., 1969: Electromagnetic Scattering on Spherical Polydispersions. Elsevier, 290 pp.

  • Hignett, P., and J. P. Taylor, 1996: The radiative properties of inhomogeneous boundary layer clouds: Observations and modeling. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1341–1364.

  • Houze, R. A., and A. K. Betts, 1981: Convection in GATE. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,19, 541–576.

  • Isaacs, R. G., W. C. Wang, R. D. Worsham, and S. Goldenberg, 1987:Multiple scattering LOWTRAN and FASCODE models. Appl. Opt.,26, 1272–1281.

  • Jonas, P., 1992: Some effects of spatial variations of water content on the reflectance of clouds. Ann. Geophys.,10, 260–266.

  • Kneizys, F. X., E. P. Shettle, L. W. Abreeu, J. H. Chetwind, G. P. Anderson, W. O. Allery, J. E. A. Selby, and S. A. Clough, 1988:AFGL-TR-88-0177, Phillips Lab., Hanscom AFB, MA, 137 pp. [NTIS 206733.].

  • Kobayashi, T., 1993: Effects due to cloud geometry on biases in the albedo derived from radiance measurements. J. Climate,6, 120–128.

  • Lewis, E. E., and W. F. Miller, 1984: Computational Methods of Neutron Transport. John Wiley and Sons, 401 pp.

  • Li, Z. Q., H. W. Barker, and L. Moreau, 1995: The variable effect of clouds on atmospheric absorption of solar radiation. Nature,376, 486–490.

  • Liou, K. N., 1980: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation. International Geophysics Series, Vol. 25, Academic Press, 392 pp.

  • ——, 1992: Radiation and Cloud Processes in the Atmosphere: Theory, Observation and Modeling. Oxford University Press, 487 pp.

  • McKee, T. B., and S. K. Cox, 1974: Scattering of visible radiation by finite clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1885–1892.

  • O’Hirok, W., and C. Gautier, 1998: A three-dimensional radiative transfer model to investigate the solar radiation within a cloudy atmosphere. Part II: Spectral effects. J. Atmos. Sci., in press.

  • Pilewskie, P., and F. P. J. Valero, 1995: Direct observations of excess absorption by clouds. Science,267, 1626–1629.

  • Ramanathan, V., B. Subasilar, G. Zhang, W. Conant, R. D. Cess, J. Kiehl, H. Grassl, and L. Shi, 1995: Warm pool heat budget and shortwave cloud forcing—A missing physics. Science,267, 499–503.

  • Ricchiazzi, P. J., S. Yang, C. Gautier, and D. Sowle, 1998: SBDART:A research and teaching software tool for plane-parallel radiative transfer in the earth’s atmosphere. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., in press.

  • Rossow, W. B., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–20.

  • Segal, M., and J. Davis, 1992: The impact of deep cumulus reflection on the ground-level global irradiance. J. Appl. Meteor.,31, 217–222.

  • Stephens, G. L., 1978: Radiation profiles in extended water clouds. Part II: Parameterization schemes. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 2123–2132.

  • ——, 1988a: Radiative transfer through arbitrarily shaped optical media. Part I: A general method of solution. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1818–1836.

  • ——, 1988b: Radiative transfer through arbitrarily shaped optical media. Part II: Group theory and simple closures. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 1837–1848.

  • ——, and S. Tsay, 1990: On the cloud absorption anomaly. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 671–704.

  • Welch, R. M., and B. A. Wielicki, 1989: Reflected fluxes for broken clouds over a Lambertian surface. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1384–1395.

  • Wendling, P., 1977: Albedo and reflected radiance of horizontally inhomogeneous clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,34, 642–650.

  • Wiscombe, W. J., 1980: Improved Mie scattering algorithms. Appl. Opt.,19, 1505–1509.

  • ——, 1995: Atmospheric physics: An absorbing mystery. Nature,376, 466–467.

  • Zuev, V. E., and G. A. Titov, 1995: Radiative transfer in cloud fields with random geometry. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 176–190.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 772 144 15
PDF Downloads 489 96 15