Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Ackerman, A. S., O. B. Toon, and P. V. Hobbs, 1993: Dissipation of marine stratiform clouds and collapse of the marine boundary layer due to the depletion of cloud condensation nuclei by clouds. Science,262, 226–229.

  • Albrecht, B. A., 1989: Aerosols, cloud microphysics and fractional cloudiness. Science,245, 1227–1230.

  • Austin, P., Y. Wang, R. Pincus, and V. Kujala, 1995: Precipitation in stratocumulus clouds: Observational and modeling results. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2329–2352.

  • Bjerknes, J., 1938: Saturated-adiabatic ascent of air through dry-adiabatically descending environment. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,64, 325–330.

  • Boers, R., J. B. Jensen, P. B. Krummel, and H. Gerber, 1996: Microphysical and short-wave radiative structure of wintertime stratocumulus clouds over the southern ocean. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1307–1340.

  • Bretherton, C. S., and M. C. Wyant, 1997: Moisture transport, lower-tropospheric stability, and decoupling of cloud-topped boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 148–167.

  • ——, P. Austin, and S. T. Siems, 1995: Cloudiness and marine boundary layer dynamics in the ASTEX Lagrangian experiments. Part II: Cloudiness, drizzle, surface fluxes, and entrainment. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2724–2735.

  • Brost, R. A., D. H. Lenschow, and J. C. Wyngaard, 1982a: Marine stratocumulus layers. Part I: Mean conditions. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 800–817.

  • ——, J. C. Wyngaard, and D. H. Lenschow, 1982b: Marine stratocumulus layers. Part II: Turbulence budgets. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 818–836.

  • Chen, C., and W. R. Cotton, 1987: The physics of the marine stratocumulus-capped mixed layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 2951–2977.

  • De Roode, S. R., and P. G. Duynkerke, 1996: Dynamics of cumulus rising into stratocumuls as observed during the first “Lagrangian” experiment of ASTEX. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,122, 1597–1624.

  • Feingold, G., B. Stevens, W. R. Cotton, and A. S. Frisch, 1996: The relationship between drop in-cloud residence time and drizzle production in numerically simulated stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 1108–1122.

  • ——, R. L. Walko, B. Stevens, and W. R. Cotton, 1998: Simulations of marine stratocumulus using a new microphysical parameterization scheme. J. Atmos. Res., in press.

  • Gerber, H., 1996: Microphysics of marine stratocumulus clouds with two drizzle models. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 1649–1662.

  • Gunn, R., and G. D. Kinzer, 1949: The terminal velocity of fall for water drops in stagnant air. J. Meteor.,6, 243–248.

  • Hall, W. D., 1980: A detailed microphysical model within a two-dimensional dynamical framework: Model description and preliminary results. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 2486–2507.

  • Jones, R. F., 1951: Rain from non freezing clouds. Meteor. Mag.,80, 273–274.

  • Kogan, Y. L., M. P. Khairoutdinov, D. K. Lilly, Z. N. Kogan, and Q. Liu, 1995: Modeling of stratocumulus cloud layers in a large eddy simulation model with explicit microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2293–2940.

  • Kraus, E. B., 1963: The diurnal precipitation change over the sea. J. Atmos. Sci.,20, 551–556.

  • Krueger, S. K., G. T. McLean, and Q. Fu, 1995a: Numerical simulation of stratus-to-cumulus transition in the subtropical marine boundary layer. Part I: Boundary layer structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2839–2850.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1995b: Numerical simulation of stratus-to-cumulus transition in the subtropical marine boundary layer. Part II: Boundary layer circulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2851–2868.

  • Lilly, D., 1967: The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments. Proceedings of the IBM Scientific Computing Symposium on Environmental Sciences, H. H. Goldstine, Ed., IBM Publ. 320-1951, 195–210.

  • Long, A. B., 1974: Solutions to the droplet coalescence equation for polynomial kernels. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1040–1052.

  • Martin, G. M., D. W. Johnson, D. P. Rogers, P. R. Jonas, P. Minnis, and D. A. Hegg, 1995: Observations of the interaction between cumulus clouds and warm stratocumulus clouds in the marine boundary layer during ASTEX. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2902–2922.

  • Mason, B. J., and B. P. Howarth, 1952: Some characteristics of stratiform clouds over North Ireland in relation to their precipitation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,78, 226–230.

  • Mason, P., 1994: Large eddy simulations: A critical review of the technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1–26.

  • Nicholls, S., 1984: The dynamics of stratocumulus: Aircraft observations and comparisons with a mixed layer model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,110, 783–820.

  • ——, 1987: A model of drizzle growth in warm, turbulent, stratiform clouds. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 1141–1170.

  • ——, and J. Leighton, 1986: An observational study of the structure of stratiform cloud sheets: Part I. Structure. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 431–460.

  • Paluch, I. R., and D. H. Lenschow, 1991: Stratiform cloud formation in the marine boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2141–2157.

  • Pincus, R., and M. B. Baker, 1994: Effect of precipitation on the albedo susceptibility of marine boundary layer clouds. Nature,372, 250–252.

  • Pruppacher, H. R., and J. D. Klett, 1978: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. D. Reidel, 714 pp.

  • Randall, D. A., and M. J. Suarez, 1984: On the dynamics of stratocumulus formation and dissipation. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 3052–3057.

  • Schubert, W. H., J. S. Wakefield, E. J. Steiner, and S. K. Cox, 1979:Marine stratocumulus convection. Part I: Governing equations and horizontally homogeneous solutions. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1286–1307.

  • Stevens, B., 1996: On the dynamics of precipitating stratocumulus. Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University, 140 pp. [Available from Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.].

  • ——, G. Feingold, W. R. Cotton, and R. L. Walko, 1996: Elements of the microphysical structure of numerically simulated nonprecipitating stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 980–1007.

  • ——, W. R. Cotton, and G. Feingold, 1997: A critique of one and two-dimensional models of boundary layer clouds with detailed representations of droplet microphysics. Atmos. Res., in press.

  • Turton, J. D., and S. Nicholls, 1987: A study of the diurnal variation of stratocumulus using a multiple mixed layer model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 969–1009.

  • Tzivion, S., G. Feingold, and Z. Levin, 1987: An efficient numerical solution to the stochastic collection equation. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 3139–3149.

  • Wang, S., and B. A. Albrecht, 1986: A stratocumulus model with an internal circulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2374–2390.

  • ——, and Q. Wang, 1994: Roles of drizzle in a one-dimensional third-order turbulence closure model of the nocturnal stratus-topped marine boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 1559–1576.

  • Wyant, M. C., C. S. Bretherton, H. A. Rand, and D. E. Stevens, 1997:Numerical simulations and a conceptual model of the stratocumulus to trade cumulus transition. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 168–192.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 426 130 15
PDF Downloads 218 68 13
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Large-Eddy Simulations of Strongly Precipitating, Shallow, Stratocumulus-Topped Boundary Layers

Bjorn StevensNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Bjorn Stevens in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
William R. CottonDepartment of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by William R. Cotton in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
,
Graham FeingoldCooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

Search for other papers by Graham Feingold in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
, and
Chin-Hoh MoengNational Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Chin-Hoh Moeng in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
Print Publication:
01 Dec 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<3616:LESOSP>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
3616–3638
Restricted access

Abstract

Large-eddy simulations that incorporate a size-resolving representation of cloud water are used to study the effect of heavy drizzle on PBL structure. Simulated surface precipitation rates average about 1 mm day−1. Heavily drizzling simulations are compared to nondrizzling simulations under two nocturnal PBL regimes—one primarily driven by buoyancy and the other driven equally by buoyancy and shear. Drizzle implies a net latent heating in the cloud that leads to sharp reductions in both entrainment and the production of turbulent kinetic energy by buoyancy (particularly in downdrafts). Drizzle, which evaporates below cloud base, promotes a cooler and moister subcloud layer that further inhibits deep mixing. The cooling and moistening is in quantitative agreement with some observations and is shown to favor the formation of cumuli rising out of the subcloud layer. The cumuli, which are local in space and time, are responsible for most of the heat and moisture transport. They also appear to generate a larger-scale circulation that differs dramatically from the regularity typically found in nonprecipitating stratocumulus. Time-averaged turbulent fluxes of heat and moisture increase in the presence of precipitation, suggesting that drizzle (and drizzle-induced stratification) should not necessarily be taken as a sign of decoupling. Because drizzle primarily affects the vertical distribution of buoyancy, shear production of turbulent kinetic energy mitigates some of the effects described above. Based on large-eddy simulation the authors hypothesize that shallow, well-mixed, radiatively driven stratocumulus cannot persist in the presence of heavy drizzle. In accord with some simpler models, the simulated case with heavy precipitation promotes a reduction in both liquid-water path and entrainment. However, the simulations suggest that time-integrated cloud fraction may increase as a result of drizzle because thinner precipitating clouds may persist longer if the boundary layer does not deepen as rapidly. These somewhat more complicated dynamics have important implications for a number of hypotheses suggesting that changes in aerosol concentrations, when metabolized by stratocumulus, have a significant effect on climate.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bjorn Stevens, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Email: bstevens@atmos.ucla.edu

Abstract

Large-eddy simulations that incorporate a size-resolving representation of cloud water are used to study the effect of heavy drizzle on PBL structure. Simulated surface precipitation rates average about 1 mm day−1. Heavily drizzling simulations are compared to nondrizzling simulations under two nocturnal PBL regimes—one primarily driven by buoyancy and the other driven equally by buoyancy and shear. Drizzle implies a net latent heating in the cloud that leads to sharp reductions in both entrainment and the production of turbulent kinetic energy by buoyancy (particularly in downdrafts). Drizzle, which evaporates below cloud base, promotes a cooler and moister subcloud layer that further inhibits deep mixing. The cooling and moistening is in quantitative agreement with some observations and is shown to favor the formation of cumuli rising out of the subcloud layer. The cumuli, which are local in space and time, are responsible for most of the heat and moisture transport. They also appear to generate a larger-scale circulation that differs dramatically from the regularity typically found in nonprecipitating stratocumulus. Time-averaged turbulent fluxes of heat and moisture increase in the presence of precipitation, suggesting that drizzle (and drizzle-induced stratification) should not necessarily be taken as a sign of decoupling. Because drizzle primarily affects the vertical distribution of buoyancy, shear production of turbulent kinetic energy mitigates some of the effects described above. Based on large-eddy simulation the authors hypothesize that shallow, well-mixed, radiatively driven stratocumulus cannot persist in the presence of heavy drizzle. In accord with some simpler models, the simulated case with heavy precipitation promotes a reduction in both liquid-water path and entrainment. However, the simulations suggest that time-integrated cloud fraction may increase as a result of drizzle because thinner precipitating clouds may persist longer if the boundary layer does not deepen as rapidly. These somewhat more complicated dynamics have important implications for a number of hypotheses suggesting that changes in aerosol concentrations, when metabolized by stratocumulus, have a significant effect on climate.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bjorn Stevens, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Email: bstevens@atmos.ucla.edu

Save