Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Approximate Dynamical Equations for Fronts Modified by the Planetary Boundary Layer

C. Snyder National Center for Atmospheric Research,* Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by C. Snyder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Mar 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<0777:ADEFFM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
777–787
Restricted access

Abstract

The planetary boundary layer (PBL) strongly modifies the structure of surface fronts; yet standard theories of frontogenesis ignore the PBL. As a first step toward understanding the effects of the PBL on frontogenesis, dominant terms are estimated through a scale analysis in an attempt to identify approximations to the primitive equations that are useful near fronts and within the planetary boundary layer. The scaling reveals the absence of small parameters in such flows and emphasizes the importance of turning of the wind with height in determining the frontal dynamics. Although without small parameters the scale analysis is at most suggestive, it indicates that the geostrophic momentum and Ekman momentum approximations will not be accurate, and that the cross-front acceleration may in practice be negligible, as proposed by Cullen. Analysis of a thin viscous boundary layer beneath a front supports these conclusions, as do diagnostics applied to numerical simulations. The scale analysis and diagnostic results together suggest that the frontal PBL may have intrinsic dynamics, unlike an Ekman layer, which is directly slaved to the interior flow.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Chris Snyder, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Abstract

The planetary boundary layer (PBL) strongly modifies the structure of surface fronts; yet standard theories of frontogenesis ignore the PBL. As a first step toward understanding the effects of the PBL on frontogenesis, dominant terms are estimated through a scale analysis in an attempt to identify approximations to the primitive equations that are useful near fronts and within the planetary boundary layer. The scaling reveals the absence of small parameters in such flows and emphasizes the importance of turning of the wind with height in determining the frontal dynamics. Although without small parameters the scale analysis is at most suggestive, it indicates that the geostrophic momentum and Ekman momentum approximations will not be accurate, and that the cross-front acceleration may in practice be negligible, as proposed by Cullen. Analysis of a thin viscous boundary layer beneath a front supports these conclusions, as do diagnostics applied to numerical simulations. The scale analysis and diagnostic results together suggest that the frontal PBL may have intrinsic dynamics, unlike an Ekman layer, which is directly slaved to the interior flow.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Chris Snyder, NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Bannon, P. R., and T. L. Salem Jr., 1995: Aspects of the baroclinic boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 574–596.

  • Blumen, W., 1980: A comparison between the Hoskins–Bretherton model of frontogenesis and the analysis of an intense surface frontal zone. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 64–77.

  • Bond, N. A., and R. G. Fleagle, 1985: Structure of a cold front over the ocean. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,111, 739–759.

  • Brost, R. A., D. H. Lenschow, and J. C. Wyngaard, 1982: Marine stratocumulus layers. Part I: Mean conditions. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 800–817.

  • Browning, K. A., and T. W. Harrold, 1970: Air motion and precipitation at a cold front. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,96, 369–389.

  • Cooper, I. M., A. J. Thorpe, and C. H. Bishop, 1992: The role of diffusive effects on potential vorticity in fronts. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,118, 629–647.

  • Csanady, G. T., 1974: Equilibrium theory of the planetary boundary layer with an inversion lid. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,6, 63–79.

  • Cullen, M. J. P., 1989: On the incorporation of atmospheric boundary layer effects into a balanced model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,115, 1109–1131.

  • Garner, S. T., 1989: Fully Lagrangian numerical solutions of unbalanced frontogenesis and frontal collapse. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 717–739.

  • Garrat, J. R., W. L. Physick, R. K. Smith, and A. J. Troup, 1985: The Australian summertime cool change. II: Mesoscale processes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 202–223.

  • Hoskins, B. J., 1975: The geostrophic momentum approximation and the semi-geostrophic equations. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 233–242.

  • ——, and F. P. Bretherton, 1972: Atmospheric frontogenesis models:Mathematical formulation and solution. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 11–37.

  • Keyser, D. and R. A. Anthes, 1982: The influence of planetary boundary layer physics on frontal structure in the Hoskins–Bretherton horizontal shear model. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 1783–1802.

  • Levy, G., 1989: Surface dynamics of observed maritime fronts. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1219–1232.

  • Miller, L. J., M. A. LeMone, W. Blumen, R. L. Grossman, N. Gamage, and R. J. Zamora, 1996: The low-level structure and evolution of a dry cold front over the central United States. Part I: Mesoscale observations. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 1648–1675.

  • Moeng, C.-H., and P. P. Sullivan, 1994: A comparison of shear- and buoyancy-driven planetary boundary layer flows. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 999–1022.

  • Ogura, Y., and D. Portis, 1982: Structure of the cold front observed in SESAME–AVE III and its comparison with the Hoskins–Bretherton frontogenesis model. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 2773–2792.

  • Ostdiek, V., and W. Blumen, 1995: Deformation frontogenesis: Observations and theory. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1487–1500.

  • Pedlosky, J., 1987: Geophysical Fluid Dynamics. Springer–Verlag, 710 pp.

  • Reeder, M. J., and R. K. Smith, 1986: A comparison between frontogenesis in the two-dimensional Eady model of baroclinic instability and summertime cold fronts in the Australian region. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,112, 293–313.

  • Sanders, F., 1955: An investigation of the structure and dynamics of an intense frontal zone. J. Meteor.,12, 542–552.

  • Snyder, C., W. C. Skamarock, and R. Rotunno, 1993: Frontal dynamics near and following frontal collapse. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3194–3212.

  • Tan, Z., and R. Wu, 1993: The Ekman momentum approximation and its application. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,68, 193–199.

  • Thorpe, A. J., and S. A. Clough, 1991: Mesoscale dynamics of cold fronts: Structures described by dropsoundings in FRONTS 87. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,117, 903–941.

  • Troen, I. B., and L. Mahrt, 1986: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation. Bound.-Layer Meteor.,37, 129–148.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., N. T. Atkins, and C. Liu, 1995: Observations of the early evolution of an explosive oceanic cyclone during ERICA IOP 5. Part II: Airborne Doppler analysis of the mesoscale circulation and frontal structure. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 1311–1327.

  • Wu, R., and W. Blumen, 1982: An analysis of Ekman boundary layer dynamics incorporating the geostrophic momentum approximation. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 1774–1782.

  • Xu, Q., 1992: Formation and evolution of frontal rainbands and geostrophic potential vorticity anomalies. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 629–648.

  • Yamada, T., 1976: On the similarity functions A, B and C of the planetary boundary layer. J. Atmos. Sci.,33, 781–793.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 307 72 42
PDF Downloads 61 25 3