An Efficient Method for Online Calculations of Photolysis and Heating Rates

J. Landgraf Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

Search for other papers by J. Landgraf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
P. J. Crutzen Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

Search for other papers by P. J. Crutzen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The authors present a computationally highly efficient method for the online calculation of photolysis and heating rates, which is especially suited for coupled transport–chemistry models. For this purpose, the spectral range 178.6 nm ≤ λ ≤ 752.5 nm, which is important for photochemistry in the troposphere and middle atmosphere, is divided into eight wavelength bands. For each band a parameterization of its contribution to photolysis and heating rates for a purely absorbing atmosphere is proposed, taking into consideration only absorption by O2 and O3. Scattering by molecules, aerosols, and clouds are taken into account by a correction factor, which is calculated online with a radiative transfer code at only one wavelength within each interval. The method yields photolysis and heating rates with less than 10% error for solar zenith angles less than 80° in the troposphere and even beyond in the stratosphere.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jochen Landgraf, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany.

Abstract

The authors present a computationally highly efficient method for the online calculation of photolysis and heating rates, which is especially suited for coupled transport–chemistry models. For this purpose, the spectral range 178.6 nm ≤ λ ≤ 752.5 nm, which is important for photochemistry in the troposphere and middle atmosphere, is divided into eight wavelength bands. For each band a parameterization of its contribution to photolysis and heating rates for a purely absorbing atmosphere is proposed, taking into consideration only absorption by O2 and O3. Scattering by molecules, aerosols, and clouds are taken into account by a correction factor, which is calculated online with a radiative transfer code at only one wavelength within each interval. The method yields photolysis and heating rates with less than 10% error for solar zenith angles less than 80° in the troposphere and even beyond in the stratosphere.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Jochen Landgraf, Max-Planck-Institute for Chemistry, P.O. Box 3060, 55020 Mainz, Germany.

Save
  • Anderson, A. D., R. deMajistre, S. Lloyd, and P. K. Swaminathan, 1995: Impact of aerosols and clouds on the troposphere and stratosphere radiation field with application to twilight photochemistry at 20 km. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 7135–7145.

  • Briegleb, B. P., 1992: Delta-Eddington approximation for solar radiation in the NCAR community climate model. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 7603–7612.

  • Brühl, C., and P. J. Crutzen, 1988: Scenarios of possible changes in atmospheric temperatures and ozone concentrations due to man’s activities, estimated with a one-dimensional coupled photochemical climate model. Climate Dyn.,2, 173–203.

  • Chandrasekhar, S., 1960: Radiative Transfer. Dover, 393 pp.

  • Kasten, F., and A. T. Young, 1989: Revised optical air mass tables and approximation formula. Appl. Opt.,28, 4735–4738.

  • Koppers, G. A. A., and D. P. Murtagh, 1996: Model studies of the influence of O2 photodissociation parameterizations in the Schumann–Runge bands on ozone related photolysis in the upper atmosphere. Ann. Geophys.,14, 68–79.

  • Kylling, A., K. Stamnes, and S.-C. Tsay, 1995: A reliable and efficient two-stream algorithm for spherical radiative transfer: Documentation of accuracy in realistic layered media. J. Atmos. Chem.,21, 115–150.

  • Lenoble, J., 1993: Atmospheric Radiative Transfer. Deepak, 532 pp.

  • Madronich, S., and G. Weller, 1990: Numerical integration errors in calculated tropospheric photodissociation rate coefficients. J. Atmos. Chem.,10, 289–300.

  • McClatchey, R. A., R. W. Fenn, J. E. A. Selby, F. E. Volz, and J. S. Garing, 1972: Optical properties of the atmosphere. Environ. Res. Pap.,411, AFCRL-72-0497, 108 pp.

  • Meier, R. R., D. E. Anderson Jr., and M. Nicolet, 1982: Radiation field in the troposphere and stratosphere from 240–1000 nm.—I. General analysis. Planet. Space Sci.,30, 923–933.

  • Michelangeli, D. V., M. Allen, Y. L. Yung, R.-L. Shia, D. Crisp, and J. Eluszkiewicz, 1992: Enhancement of the atmospheric radiation by an aerosol layer. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 865–874.

  • Nicolet, M., R. R. Meier, and D. E. Anderson Jr., 1982: Radiation field in the troposphere and stratosphere—II. Numerical analysis. Planet. Space Sci.,30, 935–983.

  • NOAA, 1976: U.S. Standard Atmosphere, 1976 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA-S/T76-1562, Washington, DC, U.S. Govt. Printing Office, 227 pp.

  • Shettle, E. P., and R. W. Fenn, 1979: Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of the humidity variations on their optical properties. Environ. Res. Pap.,676, AFGL-TR-79-0114, 91 pp.

  • Slingo, A., 1989: A GCM parameterization for the shortwave radiative properties of water clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1419–1427.

  • Stamnes, K., and S.-C. Tsay, 1990: Optimum spectral resolution for computing atmospheric heating and photodissociation rates. Planet. Space Sci.,38, 807–820.

  • ——, ——, W. Wiscombe, and K. Jayaweera, 1988: Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl. Opt.,27, 2502–2509.

  • Tsay, S.-C., and K. Stamnes, 1992: Ultraviolet radiation in the Arctic:The impact of potential ozone depletions and cloud effects. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 7829–7840.

  • Zdunkowski, W. G., 1980: An investigation of the structure of typical two-stream-methods for the calculation of solar fluxes and heating rates in clouds. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,53, 147–166.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1081 313 30
PDF Downloads 581 140 4