The Divergence Fields Associated with Time-Dependent Jet Streams

Baruch Ziv Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel, and The Open University of Israel, Tel Aviv, Israel

Search for other papers by Baruch Ziv in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Nathan Paldor Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by Nathan Paldor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

This study examines the effect of temporal variations in either location or structure of both straight and curved jets on their associated divergence patterns. For each of these jets the time-dependent geopotential height field is prescribed analytically, from which the geostrophic and ageostrophic wind fields are extracted. The divergence fields are calculated separately for the steady state (which was commonly assumed in studies on this subject) and for the following time-dependent cases: progressing, retrograding, intensifying, and weakening jets. In this study, the “intensification” of a straight jet implies an increase in the wind speed while in the case of a curved jet the intensification refers to an increase in the meandering aspect, that is, amplitude divided by wavelength.

The dominant divergence pattern of a straight jet consists of a quadrupole structure of four divergence/convergence centers, and in the case of a curved jet the pattern consists of a periodic chain of centers (of alternating signs) located along the jet axis at the inflection points. In progressing and retrograding straight and curved jets, the divergence patterns remain unaltered compared with those of the steady state, but the amplitude decreases in the former and increases in the latter. For an intensifying straight jet, the divergence patterns increase at the entrance region and weaken at the exit, while at the same time being slightly shifted downstream. The reverse holds for the weakening straight jet. The changes in the meandering aspect of a curved jet are accompanied by an intensification of the divergence patterns in both the intensifying and weakening jets. These are accompanied by a shift in their location relative to the jet: downstream for the intensifying jet and upstream for the weakening one.

These findings point to the effect of time dependence on the cyclogenesis associated with jet streams and on feedback mechanisms there. For each of the cases considered here, the authors demonstrate that the divergence patterns indicate a negative feedback, which tends to suppress the prescribed temporal change.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Nathan Paldor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.

Abstract

This study examines the effect of temporal variations in either location or structure of both straight and curved jets on their associated divergence patterns. For each of these jets the time-dependent geopotential height field is prescribed analytically, from which the geostrophic and ageostrophic wind fields are extracted. The divergence fields are calculated separately for the steady state (which was commonly assumed in studies on this subject) and for the following time-dependent cases: progressing, retrograding, intensifying, and weakening jets. In this study, the “intensification” of a straight jet implies an increase in the wind speed while in the case of a curved jet the intensification refers to an increase in the meandering aspect, that is, amplitude divided by wavelength.

The dominant divergence pattern of a straight jet consists of a quadrupole structure of four divergence/convergence centers, and in the case of a curved jet the pattern consists of a periodic chain of centers (of alternating signs) located along the jet axis at the inflection points. In progressing and retrograding straight and curved jets, the divergence patterns remain unaltered compared with those of the steady state, but the amplitude decreases in the former and increases in the latter. For an intensifying straight jet, the divergence patterns increase at the entrance region and weaken at the exit, while at the same time being slightly shifted downstream. The reverse holds for the weakening straight jet. The changes in the meandering aspect of a curved jet are accompanied by an intensification of the divergence patterns in both the intensifying and weakening jets. These are accompanied by a shift in their location relative to the jet: downstream for the intensifying jet and upstream for the weakening one.

These findings point to the effect of time dependence on the cyclogenesis associated with jet streams and on feedback mechanisms there. For each of the cases considered here, the authors demonstrate that the divergence patterns indicate a negative feedback, which tends to suppress the prescribed temporal change.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Nathan Paldor, Department of Atmospheric Sciences, Institute of Earth Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel.

Save
  • Bjerknes, J., 1951: Extratropical cyclones. Compendium of Meteorology, T. F. Malone, Ed., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 577–598.

  • ——, and J. Holmboe, 1944: On the theory of cyclones. J. Meteor.,1, 1–22.

  • Cammas, J. P., and D. Ramond, 1989: Analysis and diagnosis of the composition of ageostrophic circulations in jet-front systems. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 2447–2462.

  • Dutkiewicz, S., and N. Paldor, 1994: On the mixing enhancement in a meandering jet due to the interaction with an eddy. J. Phys. Oceanog.,24, 2418–2423.

  • Dutton, J. A., 1976: The Ceaseless Wind, An Introduction to the Theory of Atmospheric Motion. McGraw-Hill, 579 pp.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Holton, J. R., 1992: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. 2d ed. Academic Press, 507 pp.

  • Keyser, D., and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 452–499.

  • Nakamura, H., 1993: Horizontal divergence associated with zonally isolated jet streams. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2310–2313.

  • Newton, C. W., and A. Trevisan, 1984: Clinogenesis and frontogenesis in jet stream waves. Part I: Analytical relations to wave structure. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 2717–2734.

  • Palmen, E., and C. Newton, 1969: Atmospheric Circulation Systems. Academic Press, 603 pp.

  • Peng, S., and R. T. Williams, 1986: Spatial instability of the barotropic jet with slow streamwise variation. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2430–2442.

  • Shapiro, M. A., and P. J. Kennedy, 1981: Research aircraft instruments of jet stream geostrophic and ageostrophic winds. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 2642–2652.

  • Uccellini, L. W., and P. J. Kocin, 1987: The interaction of jet streak circulations during heavy snow events along the east coast of United States. Wea. Forecasting,2, 289–308.

  • ——, D. Keyser, K. F. Brill, and C. H. Wash, 1985: The President’s Day cyclone of 18–19 February 1979: Influence of upstream trough amplification and associated tropopause folding on rapid cyclogenesis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,113, 962–988.