• Albrecht, B. A., R. S. Penc, and W. H. Schubert, 1985: An observational study of cloud-topped mixed layers. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 800–822.

  • ——, D. A. Randall, and S. Nicholls, 1988: Observations of marine stratocumulus during FIRE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,69, 618–626.

  • ——, C. S. Bretherton, D. Johnson, W. H. Schubert, and A. S. Frisch, 1995: The Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment—ASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,76, 889–903.

  • Atlas, D., 1954: The estimation of cloud content by radar. J. Meteor.,11, 309–317.

  • Brost, R. A., D. H. Lenschow, and J. C. Wyngaard, 1982: Marine stratocumulus layers. Part I: Mean conditions. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 800–817.

  • Del Genio, A. D., M.-S. Yai, W. Kovari, and K. K.-W. Lo, 1996: A prognostic cloud water parameterization for global climate models. J. Climate,9, 270–304.

  • Fouquart, Y., J. C. Buriez, M. Herman, and R. S. Kandel, 1990: The influence of clouds on radiation: A climate-modeling perspective. Rev. Geophys.,28, 145–166.

  • Frisch, A. S., C. W. Fairall, and J. B. Snider, 1995: Measurement of stratus cloud and drizzle parameters in ASTEX with Ka-band Doppler radar and microwave radiometer. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2788–2799.

  • ——, G. Feingold, C. W. Fairall, T. Uttal, and J. B. Snider, 1999: On cloud radar and microwave radiometer measurements of stratus liquid water profiles. J. Geophys. Res., in press.

  • Gultepe, I., and G. A. Isaac, 1997: Liquid water content and temperature relationship from aircraft observations and its applicability to GCMs. J. Climate,10, 446–452.

  • Hanel, G., 1972: The ratio of the extinction coefficient to the mass of atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of the relative humidity. Aerosol Sci.,3, 455–460.

  • Hogg, D. C., F. O. Guiraud, J. B. Snider, M. T. Decker, and E. R. Westwater, 1983: A steerable dual-channel microwave radiometer for measurements of water vapor and liquid in the troposphere. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 789–806.

  • Kogan, Z. N., Y. L. Kogan, and D. K. Lilly, 1996: Evaluation of sulfate aerosols indirect effect in marine stratocumulus clouds using observation-derived cloud climatology. Geophys. Res. Lett.,23, 1937–1940.

  • Lhermitte, R., 1987: A 94-GHz Doppler radar for cloud observations. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 36–48.

  • Liao, L., and K. Sassen, 1994: Investigation of relationships between Ka-band radar reflectivity and ice and liquid water contents. Atmos. Res.,34, 231–248.

  • Martin, G. M., D. W. Johnson, and A. Spice, 1994: The measurement and parameterization of effective radius of droplets in warm stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 1823–1842.

  • Mead, J. B., A. L. Pazmany, S. M. Sekelsky, and R. E. McIntosh, 1994: Millimeter-wave radar for remotely sensing clouds and precipitation. Proc. IEEE,82, 1891–1906.

  • Pasqualucci, F., B. Bartram, R. A. Kropfli, and W. R. Moninger, 1983:A millimeter-wavelength dual-polarization Doppler radar for cloud and precipitation studies. J. Climate Appl. Meteor.,22, 758–765.

  • Sassen, K., 1994: Advances in polarization diversity lidar for cloud remote sensing. Proc. IEEE,82, 1907–1914.

  • ——, and L. Liao, 1996: Estimation of cloud content by W-band radar. J. Appl. Meteor.,35, 932–938.

  • ——, H. Zhao, and G. C. Dodd, 1992: Simulated polarization diversity returns from water and precipitating mixed phase clouds. Appl. Opt.,31, 2914–2923.

  • Sauvageot, H., and J. Omar, 1987: Radar reflectivity of cumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol.,4, 264–272.

  • Slingo, A., 1990: Sensitivity of the earth’s radiation budget to changes in low clouds. Nature,343, 49–52.

  • Stokes, G. M., and S. E. Schwartz, 1994: The Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) program: Programmatic background and design of the cloud and radiation testbed. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 1201–1221.

  • Twomey, S., 1974: Pollution and the planetary albedo. Atmos. Environ.,8, 1251–1256.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 234 35 4
PDF Downloads 99 20 2

Continental Stratus Clouds: A Case Study Using Coordinated Remote Sensing and Aircraft Measurements

Kenneth SassenDepartment of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Kenneth Sassen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gerald G. MaceDepartment of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Gerald G. Mace in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Zhien WangDepartment of Meteorology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah

Search for other papers by Zhien Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael R. PoellotAtmospheric Sciences Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota

Search for other papers by Michael R. Poellot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stephen M. SekelskyMicrowave Remote Sensing Laboratory, University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Stephen M. Sekelsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Robert E. McIntoshMicrowave Remote Sensing Laboratory, University of Massachusetts–Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Robert E. McIntosh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

A continental stratus cloud layer was studied by advanced ground-based remote sensing instruments and aircraft probes on 30 April 1994 from the Cloud and Radiation Testbed site in north-central Oklahoma. The boundary layer structure clearly resembled that of a cloud-topped mixed layer, and the cloud content is shown to be near adiabatic up to the cloud-top entrainment zone. A cloud retrieval algorithm using the radar reflectivity and cloud droplet concentration (either measured in situ or deduced using dual-channel microwave radiometer data) is applied to construct uniquely high-resolution cross sections of liquid water content and mean droplet radius. The combined evidence indicates that the 350–600 m deep, slightly supercooled (2.0° to −2.0°C) cloud, which failed to produce any detectable ice or drizzle particles, contained an average droplet concentration of 347 cm−3, and a maximum liquid water content of 0.8 g m−3 and mean droplet radius of 9 μm near cloud top. Lidar data indicate that the Ka-band radar usually detected the cloud-base height to within ∼50 m, such that the radar insensitivity to small cloud droplets had a small impact on the findings. Radar-derived liquid water paths ranged from 71 to 259 g m−2 as the stratus deck varied, which is in excellent agreement with dual-channel microwave radiometer data, but ∼20% higher than that measured in situ. This difference appears to be due to the undersampling of the few largest cloud droplets by the aircraft probes. This combination of approaches yields a unique image of the content of a continental stratus cloud, as well as illustrating the utility of modern remote sensing systems for probing nonprecipitating water clouds.

* Deceased.

Corresponding author address: Kenneth Sassen, 135 S. 1460 E. (819 WBB), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

Email: ksassen@atmos.met.utah.edu

Abstract

A continental stratus cloud layer was studied by advanced ground-based remote sensing instruments and aircraft probes on 30 April 1994 from the Cloud and Radiation Testbed site in north-central Oklahoma. The boundary layer structure clearly resembled that of a cloud-topped mixed layer, and the cloud content is shown to be near adiabatic up to the cloud-top entrainment zone. A cloud retrieval algorithm using the radar reflectivity and cloud droplet concentration (either measured in situ or deduced using dual-channel microwave radiometer data) is applied to construct uniquely high-resolution cross sections of liquid water content and mean droplet radius. The combined evidence indicates that the 350–600 m deep, slightly supercooled (2.0° to −2.0°C) cloud, which failed to produce any detectable ice or drizzle particles, contained an average droplet concentration of 347 cm−3, and a maximum liquid water content of 0.8 g m−3 and mean droplet radius of 9 μm near cloud top. Lidar data indicate that the Ka-band radar usually detected the cloud-base height to within ∼50 m, such that the radar insensitivity to small cloud droplets had a small impact on the findings. Radar-derived liquid water paths ranged from 71 to 259 g m−2 as the stratus deck varied, which is in excellent agreement with dual-channel microwave radiometer data, but ∼20% higher than that measured in situ. This difference appears to be due to the undersampling of the few largest cloud droplets by the aircraft probes. This combination of approaches yields a unique image of the content of a continental stratus cloud, as well as illustrating the utility of modern remote sensing systems for probing nonprecipitating water clouds.

* Deceased.

Corresponding author address: Kenneth Sassen, 135 S. 1460 E. (819 WBB), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

Email: ksassen@atmos.met.utah.edu

Save