Vorticity and Potential Vorticity in Mountain Wakes

R. Rotunno National Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by R. Rotunno in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
V. Grubišić National Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by V. Grubišić in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
P. K. Smolarkiewicz National Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by P. K. Smolarkiewicz in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

A wake is traditionally defined as the region of nearly stagnant flow downstream of a body in a uniform stream. In a stratified fluid, the motions and density surfaces downstream of an obstacle become primarily horizontal; the vertical component of the vorticity associated with the wake, coexisting with the stable vertical density stratification, implies that there is potential vorticity (PV) in the wake. Recent work has demonstrated that dissipation aloft, associated with a breaking mountain wave over an isolated peak, produces a dipole in PV downstream; the dipolar vertical vorticity of the wake is associated with the PV dipole. Although one may infer the existence of vorticity downstream, the PV argument is silent on the question, Where does the wake vorticity come from? To answer this question, a weakly nonlinear model for PV production and wake formation in the case of a small-amplitude mountain has been analyzed, and numerical simulations pertaining to the strongly nonlinear large-amplitude case have been carried out. The simple model indicates that even with dissipation in the system, the vertical vorticity of the wake arises through the tilting of baroclinically generated horizontal vorticity by the dissipating mountain wave. This analysis shows that there need not be any direct effect of friction in the vorticity equation to produce the vorticity of the wake; dissipation (due to friction and/or heating) enters indirectly through its effect on the tilting term. Analysis of numerical simulations of the large-amplitude case shows that the conclusions from the weakly nonlinear model regarding the source of wake vorticity continue to hold in the strongly nonlinear regime.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Richard Rotunno, NCAR/MMM, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Abstract

A wake is traditionally defined as the region of nearly stagnant flow downstream of a body in a uniform stream. In a stratified fluid, the motions and density surfaces downstream of an obstacle become primarily horizontal; the vertical component of the vorticity associated with the wake, coexisting with the stable vertical density stratification, implies that there is potential vorticity (PV) in the wake. Recent work has demonstrated that dissipation aloft, associated with a breaking mountain wave over an isolated peak, produces a dipole in PV downstream; the dipolar vertical vorticity of the wake is associated with the PV dipole. Although one may infer the existence of vorticity downstream, the PV argument is silent on the question, Where does the wake vorticity come from? To answer this question, a weakly nonlinear model for PV production and wake formation in the case of a small-amplitude mountain has been analyzed, and numerical simulations pertaining to the strongly nonlinear large-amplitude case have been carried out. The simple model indicates that even with dissipation in the system, the vertical vorticity of the wake arises through the tilting of baroclinically generated horizontal vorticity by the dissipating mountain wave. This analysis shows that there need not be any direct effect of friction in the vorticity equation to produce the vorticity of the wake; dissipation (due to friction and/or heating) enters indirectly through its effect on the tilting term. Analysis of numerical simulations of the large-amplitude case shows that the conclusions from the weakly nonlinear model regarding the source of wake vorticity continue to hold in the strongly nonlinear regime.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Richard Rotunno, NCAR/MMM, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.

Save
  • Baines, P. G., 1995: Topographic Effects in Stratified Flows. Cambridge University Press, 482 pp.

  • Batchelor, G. K., 1967: An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, 615 pp.

  • Crook, A. N., T. L. Clark, and M. W. Moncrieff, 1990: The Denver Cyclone: Formation in low Froude number flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 2725–2742.

  • Durran, D. R., and J. B. Klemp, 1983: A compressible model for the simulation of moist mountain waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,111, 2341–2361.

  • Grubišić, V., R. B. Smith, and C. Schär, 1995: The effect of bottom friction on shallow-water flow past an isolated obstacle. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 1985–2005.

  • Haynes, P. H., and M. E. McIntyre, 1987: On the evolution of vorticity and potential vorticity in the presence of diabatic heating and frictional or other forces. J. Atmos. Sci.,44, 828–841.

  • Mason, P. J., 1994: Large-eddy simulation: A critical review of the technique. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,120, 1–26.

  • McIntyre, M. E., and W. A. Norton, 1990: Dissipative wave–mean interactions and the transport of vorticity and potential vorticity. J. Fluid Mech.,212, 403–435.

  • Morton, B. R., 1984: The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.,28, 277–308.

  • Prandtl, L., and O. G. Tietjens, 1957: Applied Hydro- and Aeromechanics. Dover, 311 pp.

  • Rotunno, R., and P. K. Smolarkiewicz, 1995: Vorticity generation in the shallow-water equations as applied to hydraulic jumps. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 320–330.

  • Schär, C., 1993: A generalization of Bernoulli’s theorem. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1437–1443.

  • ——, and R. B. Smith, 1993: Shallow-water flow past isolated topography. Part I: Vorticity production and wake formation. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1373–1400.

  • ——, and D. R. Durran, 1997: Vortex formation and vortex shedding in continuously stratified flows past isolated topography. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 534–554.

  • Schumann, U., 1991: Subgrid length-scales for large-eddy simulation of stratified turbulence. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn.,2, 279–290.

  • Smith, R. B., 1980: Linear theory of stratified hydrostatic flow past an isolated mountain. Tellus,32, 348–364.

  • ——, 1989a: Comment on “Low Froude number flow past three-dimensional obstacles. Part I: Baroclinically generated lee vortices.” J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 3611–3613.

  • ——, 1989b: Hydrostatic airflow over mountains. Advances in Geophysics, Vol. 31, Academic Press, 1–41.

  • ——, and D. F. Smith, 1995: Pseudoinviscid wake formation by mountains in a shallow-water flow with a drifting vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 436–454.

  • Smolarkiewicz, P. K., and R. Rotunno, 1989: Low Froude number flow past three-dimensional obstacles. Part I: Baroclinically generated lee vortices. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1154–1164.

  • ——, and L. G. Margolin, 1997: On forward-in-time differencing for fluids: An Eulerian/semi-Lagrangian non-hydrostatic model for stratified flows. Atmos.–Ocean,35 (special issue), 127–152.

  • Thorpe, A. J., H. Volkert, and D. Heinman, 1993: Potential vorticity of flow along the Alps. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 1573–1590.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 861 381 203
PDF Downloads 357 99 10