Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Structure and Dynamics of Tornado-Like Vortices

David S. Nolan Department of Mathematics, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

Search for other papers by David S. Nolan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Brian F. Farrell Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Search for other papers by Brian F. Farrell in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Aug 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056<2908:TSADOT>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2908–2936
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

The structure and dynamics of axisymmetric tornado-like vortices are explored with a numerical model of axisymmetric incompressible flow based on recently developed numerical methods. The model is first shown to compare favorably with previous results and is then used to study the effects of varying the major parameters controlling the vortex: the strength of the convective forcing, the strength of the rotational forcing, and the magnitude of the model eddy viscosity. Dimensional analysis of the model problem indicates that the results must depend on only two dimensionless parameters. The natural choices for these two parameters are a convective Reynolds number (based on the velocity scale associated with the convective forcing) and a parameter analogous to the swirl ratio in laboratory models. However, by examining sets of simulations with different model parameters it is found that a dimensionless parameter known as the vortex Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the far-field circulation to the eddy viscosity, is more effective than the conventional swirl ratio for predicting the structure of the vortex.

As the value of the vortex Reynolds number is increased, it is observed that the tornado-like vortex transitions from a smooth, steady flow to one with quasiperiodic oscillations. These oscillations, when present, are caused by axisymmetric disturbances propagating down toward the surface from the upper part of the domain. Attempts to identify these oscillations with linear waves associated with the shears of the mean azimuthal and vertical winds give mixed results.

The parameter space defined by the choices for model parameters is further explored with large sets of numerical simulations. For much of this parameter space it is confirmed that the vortex structure and time-dependent behavior depend strongly on the vortex Reynolds number and only weakly on the convective Reynolds number. The authors also find that for higher convective Reynolds numbers, the maximum possible wind speed increases, and the rotational forcing necessary to achieve that wind speed decreases. Physical reasoning is used to explain this behavior, and implications for tornado dynamics are discussed.

* Current affiliation: Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Corresponding author address: Dr. David S. Nolan, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.

Abstract

The structure and dynamics of axisymmetric tornado-like vortices are explored with a numerical model of axisymmetric incompressible flow based on recently developed numerical methods. The model is first shown to compare favorably with previous results and is then used to study the effects of varying the major parameters controlling the vortex: the strength of the convective forcing, the strength of the rotational forcing, and the magnitude of the model eddy viscosity. Dimensional analysis of the model problem indicates that the results must depend on only two dimensionless parameters. The natural choices for these two parameters are a convective Reynolds number (based on the velocity scale associated with the convective forcing) and a parameter analogous to the swirl ratio in laboratory models. However, by examining sets of simulations with different model parameters it is found that a dimensionless parameter known as the vortex Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the far-field circulation to the eddy viscosity, is more effective than the conventional swirl ratio for predicting the structure of the vortex.

As the value of the vortex Reynolds number is increased, it is observed that the tornado-like vortex transitions from a smooth, steady flow to one with quasiperiodic oscillations. These oscillations, when present, are caused by axisymmetric disturbances propagating down toward the surface from the upper part of the domain. Attempts to identify these oscillations with linear waves associated with the shears of the mean azimuthal and vertical winds give mixed results.

The parameter space defined by the choices for model parameters is further explored with large sets of numerical simulations. For much of this parameter space it is confirmed that the vortex structure and time-dependent behavior depend strongly on the vortex Reynolds number and only weakly on the convective Reynolds number. The authors also find that for higher convective Reynolds numbers, the maximum possible wind speed increases, and the rotational forcing necessary to achieve that wind speed decreases. Physical reasoning is used to explain this behavior, and implications for tornado dynamics are discussed.

* Current affiliation: Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

Corresponding author address: Dr. David S. Nolan, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1371.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Barcilon, A. I., 1967: Vortex decay above a stationary boundary. J. Fluid Mech.,27, 155–175.

  • Bell, J. B., and D. L. Marcus, 1992: A second order projection method for variable-density flows. J. Comput. Phys.,101, 334–348.

  • ——, P. Colella, and H. M. Glaz, 1989: A second order projection method for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys.,85, 257–283.

  • Benjamin, T. B., 1962: Theory of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech.,14, 593–629.

  • Burggraf, O. R., K. Stewartson, and R. Belcher, 1971: Boundary layer induced by a potential vortex. Phys. Fluids,14, 1821–1833.

  • Chandresekhar, S., 1961: Hydrodynamic and Hydromagnetic Stability. Oxford University Press, 652 pp.

  • Chorin, A. J., 1968: Numerical solution of the Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comput.,22, 35–47.

  • ——, 1969: On the convergence of discrete approximations to the Navier–Stokes equations. Math. Comput.,23, 341–353.

  • Church, C. R., and J. T. Snow, 1993: Laboratory models of tornadoes. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, C. Church et al., Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 277–296.

  • ——, ——, G. L. Baker, and E. M. Agee, 1979: Characterisitics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: A laboratory investigation. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1755–1776.

  • Colella, P., 1990: Multidimensional upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys.,94, 61–66.

  • Drazin, P. G., and W. H. Reid, 1981: Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press, 526 pp.

  • Emanuel, K. A., 1994: Atmospheric Convection. Oxford University Press, 580 pp.

  • Fiedler, B. H., 1993: Numerical simulation of axisymmetric tornadogenesis in forced convection. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, C. Church et al., Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 41–48.

  • ——, 1994: The thermodynamic speed limit and its violation in axisymmetric numerical simulations of tornado-like vortices. Atmos.–Ocean,32, 335–359.

  • ——, 1995: On modelling tornadoes in isolation from the parent storm. Atmos.–Ocean,33, 501–512.

  • ——, and R. Rotunno, 1986: A theory for the maximum windspeeds in tornado-like vortices. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2328–2340.

  • Harvey, J. K., 1962: Some observations of the vortex breakdown phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech.,14, 585–592.

  • Howells, P. C., R. Rotunno, and R. K. Smith, 1988: A comparative study of atmospheric and laboratory analogue numerical tornado-vortex models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,114, 801–822.

  • Klemp, J. B., and R. B. Wilhelsom, 1978: The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1070–1096.

  • Lamb, Sir Horace, 1932: Hydrodymanics. Dover, 738 pp.

  • Lewellen, W. S., 1993: Tornado vortex theory. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Predictions, and Hazards, C. Church et al., Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 19–40.

  • Lilly, D. K., 1969: Tornado dynamics. NCAR Manuscript 69-117, 39 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307.].

  • Lugt, H. J., 1989: Vortex breakdown in atmospheric columnar vortices. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,70, 1526–1537.

  • Maxworthy, T., 1973: A vorticity source for large-scale dust devils and other comments on naturally occurring columnar vortices. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 1717–1722.

  • Minion, M. L., 1994: Two methods for the study of vortex patch evolution on locally refined grids. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 121 pp. [Available from Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720.].

  • ——, 1996: On the stability of Godunov-projection methods for incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys.,123, 37–58.

  • Nolan, D. S., 1996: Axisymmetric and asymmetric vortex dynamics in convergent flows. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, 279 pp. [Available from University Microfilm, 305 N. Zeeb Rd., Ann Arbor, MI 48106.].

  • Peyret, R., and T. D. Taylor, 1983: Computational Methods for Fluid Flow. Springer-Verlag, 487 pp.

  • Rasmussen, E. N., J. M. Straka, R. Davies-Jones, C. A. Doswell III, F. H. Carr, M. D. Eilts, and D. R. MacGorman, 1994: Verification of the Origins of Rotation in Tornadoes: VORTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 995–1006.

  • Rayleigh, Lord, 1880: On the stability and instability of certain fluid motions. Proc. London Math. Soc.,11, 57–70.

  • Rotunno, R., 1977: Numerical simulation of a laboratory vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.,34, 1942–1956.

  • ——, 1979: A study in tornado-like vortex dynamics. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 140–155.

  • ——, 1984: An investigation of a three-dimensional asymmetric vortex. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 283–298.

  • Serrin, J., 1972: The swirling vortex. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,271, 325–360.

  • Taylor, G. I., 1923: Stability of a viscous liquid contained between two rotating cylinders. Proc. Roy. Soc.,223A, 289–343.

  • Walko, R., and R. Gall, 1986: Some effects of momentum diffusion on axisymmetric vortices. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2137–2148.

  • Ward, N. B., 1972: The exploration of certain features of tornado dynamics using a laboratory model. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 1194–1204.

  • Wicker, L. J., and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1995: Simulation and analysis of tornado development and decay within a three-dimensional supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 2675–2703.

  • Wilson, T., and R. Rotunno, 1986: Numerical simulation of a laminar end-wall vortex and boundary layer. Phys. Fluids,29, 3993–4005.

  • Wurman, J., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 1996: Fine-scale doppler radar observations of tornadoes. Science,272, 1774–1777.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1613 954 212
PDF Downloads 1015 429 21