3D Radiative Transfer in Weakly Inhomogeneous Medium. Part II: Discrete Ordinate Method and Effective Algorithm for Its Inversion

V. L. Galinsky Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Center for Clouds, Chemistry, and Climate, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by V. L. Galinsky in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

Abstract

The forward discrete ordinate method (DOM) has been reformulated to include effects of a weak inhomogeneity of a medium. The modification is based on an expansion of the direct beam source term. This treatment of the source term is similar to the gradient correction (GC) method, presented in the first part of the paper for the diffusion approximation. The same requirement on the scales of variations applies to the current method: length of horizontal variations of optical properties of the medium should be large in comparison to the mean radiative transport length. The modification has another important advantage in that it permits obtaining particular solutions for both infrared and direct beam radiative transfer in one computational step.

An effective algorithm for solving inverse radiative transfer problems has been developed following the above reformulation. This algorithm modifies the DOM using Newton’s iterative scheme in order to find a solution of the inverse problem. The algorithm convergence rate is very high. Typically, two to three iterations are enough in order to obtain a solution with sufficiently high accuracy. The algorithm can be applied to the plane-parallel radiative transfer as well as to the GC method.

The combination of the GC approach and the effective inverse algorithm creates an extremely useful and efficient tool for extraction of cloud fields from satellite imagery. It allows the algorithm to use radiance data with multiple views of the same pixel as an input and produce correct output even for large solar zenith or satellite view angles, when an independent pixel approximation fails.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Vitaly Galinsky, ECE, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC #0407, La Jolla, CA 92093-0407.

Email: vit@ucsd.edu

Abstract

The forward discrete ordinate method (DOM) has been reformulated to include effects of a weak inhomogeneity of a medium. The modification is based on an expansion of the direct beam source term. This treatment of the source term is similar to the gradient correction (GC) method, presented in the first part of the paper for the diffusion approximation. The same requirement on the scales of variations applies to the current method: length of horizontal variations of optical properties of the medium should be large in comparison to the mean radiative transport length. The modification has another important advantage in that it permits obtaining particular solutions for both infrared and direct beam radiative transfer in one computational step.

An effective algorithm for solving inverse radiative transfer problems has been developed following the above reformulation. This algorithm modifies the DOM using Newton’s iterative scheme in order to find a solution of the inverse problem. The algorithm convergence rate is very high. Typically, two to three iterations are enough in order to obtain a solution with sufficiently high accuracy. The algorithm can be applied to the plane-parallel radiative transfer as well as to the GC method.

The combination of the GC approach and the effective inverse algorithm creates an extremely useful and efficient tool for extraction of cloud fields from satellite imagery. It allows the algorithm to use radiance data with multiple views of the same pixel as an input and produce correct output even for large solar zenith or satellite view angles, when an independent pixel approximation fails.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Vitaly Galinsky, ECE, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, MC #0407, La Jolla, CA 92093-0407.

Email: vit@ucsd.edu

Save
  • Barker, H. W., and D. Liu, 1995: Inferring optical depth of broken clouds from Landsat data. J. Climate,8, 2620–2630.

  • Boer, E. R., and V. Ramanathan, 1997: Lagrangian approach deriving cloud characteristics from satellite observations and its implications to cloud parameterization. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 21 383–21 399.

  • Cahalan, R. F., W. Ridgway, W. J. Wiscombe, T. L. Bell, and J. B. Snider, 1994: The albedo of fractal stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2434–2455.

  • Chandrasekhar, S., 1950: Radiative Transfer. Oxford University Press, 393 pp.

  • Davis, A., A. Marshak, R. F. Cahalan, and W. J. Wiscombe, 1997a: The LANDSAT scale-break in stratocumulus as a three-dimensional radiative transfer effect: Implications for cloud remote sensing. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 241–260.

  • ——, ——, W. J. Wiscombe, and R. F. Cahalan, 1997b: Evidence for net horizontal radiative fluxes in marine stratocumulus. IRS ’96:Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation (Proceedings of the International Radiation Symposium), W. L. Smith and K. Stamnes, Eds., Deepak Publishing, 809–812.

  • Evans, K. F., 1998: The spherical harmonics discrete ordinate method for three-dimensional atmospheric radiative transfer. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 429–446.

  • Gabriel, P. M., and K. F. Evans, 1996: Simple radiative transfer methods for calculating domain-averaged solar fluxes in inhomogeneous clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 858–877.

  • Galinsky, V. L., and V. Ramanathan, 1998: 3D radiative transfer in weakly inhomogeneous medium. Part I: Diffusive approximation. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2946–2959.

  • Loeb, N. G., and R. Davies, 1996: Observational evidence of plane parallel model biases: Apparent dependence of cloud optical depth on solar zenith angle. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 1621–1634.

  • ——, and ——, 1997: Angular dependence of observed reflectances:A comparison with plane parallel theory. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 6865–6881.

  • ——, and J. A. Coakley Jr., 1998: Inference of marine stratus cloud optical depths from satellite measurements: Does 1D theory apply? J. Climate,11, 215–233.

  • ——, T. Várnai, and R. Davies, 1997: The effect of cloud inhomogeneities on the solar zenith angle dependence of nadir reflectance. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 9387–9395.

  • Marshak, A., A. Davis, W. Wiscombe, and R. Cahalan, 1995: Radiative smoothing in fractal clouds. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 26 247–26 261.

  • Moeng, C.-H., and Coauthors, 1996: Simulations of a stratocumulus-topped planetary boundary layer: Intercomparison among different numerical codes. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,77, 261–278.

  • Stamnes, K., and H. Dale, 1981: A new look at the discrete ordinate method for radiative transfer calculatons in anisotropically scattering atmospheres. Part II: Intensity computations. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 2696–2706.

  • ——, and R. A. Swanson, 1981: A new look at the discrete ordinate method for radiative transfer calculations in anisotropically scattering atmospheres. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 387–399.

  • ——, S.-C. Tsay, W. Wiscombe, and K. Jayaweera, 1988: Numerically stable algorithm for discrete-ordinate-method radiative transfer in multiple scattering and emitting layered media. Appl. Opt.,27, 2502–2509.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 181 38 1
PDF Downloads 22 6 1