Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Batchelor, G. K., 1967: An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 516 pp.

  • Brady, R. H., and E. J. Szoke, 1989: A case study of nonmescocyclone tornado development in northeast Colorado: Similarities to waterspout formation. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 843–856.

  • Chen, C., 1995: Numerical simulations of gravity currents in uniform shear flows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3240–3253.

  • Corcos, G. M., and F. S. Sherman, 1984: The mixing layer: Deterministic models of a turbulent flow. Part 1: Introduction and the two-dimensional flow. J. Fluid Mech.,139, 29–65.

  • Davies-Jones, R. P., 1986: Tornado dynamics. Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics, 2d ed., E. Kessler, Ed., University of Oklahoma Press, 197–236.

  • Doswell, C. A., III, 1985: The operational meteorology of convective weather. Vol. II: Storm scale analysis. NOAA Tech. Memo. ERL ES6-15, 240 pp. [NTIS PB85 226959/XAB.].

  • Fujita, T. T., 1981: Tornadoes and downbursts in the context of generalized planetary scales. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1511–1534.

  • Lee, B. D., 1994: The numerical simulation of non-supercell tornadogenesis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, 215 pp. [Available from the Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801.].

  • ——, and R. B. Wilhelmson, 1997a: The numerical simulation of non-supercell tornadogenesis. Part I: Initiation and evolution of pre-tornadic misocyclone circulations along a dry outflow boundary. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 32–60.

  • ——, and ——, 1997b: The numerical simulation of non-supercell tornadogenesis. Part II: Evolution of a family of tornadoes along a weak outflow boundary. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2387–2415.

  • ——, R. D. Farley, and M. R. Hjelmfelt, 1991: A numerical case study of convection initiation along colliding convergence boundaries in northeast Colorado. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2350–2366.

  • Lewellen, W. S., D. C. Lewellen, and R. I. Sykes, 1997: Large eddy simulation of a tornado’s interaction with the surface. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 581–605.

  • Liu, C., and M. W. Moncrieff, 1996: A numerical study of the effects of ambient flow and shear on density currents. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 2282–2303.

  • Mahoney, W. P., 1988: Gustfront characteristics and the kinematics associated with interacting thunderstorm outflows. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 1474–1491.

  • McWilliams, J. C., 1984: The emergence of isolated coherent vortices in turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech.,146, 21–43.

  • Riley, J. J., and R. W. Metcalfe, 1980: Direct numerical simulation of a perturbed turbulent mixing layer. AIAA 18th Aerospace Meeting, Pasadena, CA, American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1–7.

  • Roberts, R. D., and J. W. Wilson, 1995: The genesis of three non-supercell tornadoes observed with dual-Doppler radar. Mon. Wea. Rev.,123, 3408–3436.

  • Rotunno, R., J. B. Klemp, and M. L. Weisman, 1988: A theory for strong, long-lived squall lines. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 463–485.

  • Szoke, E. J., and R. Rotunno, 1993: A comparison of surface observations and visual tornado characteristics for the June 15, 1988, Denver tornado outbreak. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, Geophys. Monogr., No. 79, Amer. Geophys. Union, 353–366.

  • ——, M. L. Weisman, J. M. Brown, F. Caracena, and T. W. Schlatter, 1984: A subsynoptic analysis of the Denver tornadoes of 3 June 1981. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 790–808.

  • Wakimoto, R., and J. W. Wilson, 1989: Non-supercell tornadoes. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1113–1140.

  • ——, and B. E. Martner, 1992: Observations of a Colorado tornado. Part II: Combined photogrammetric and Doppler radar analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 552–543.

  • ——, and N. T. Atkins, 1996: Observations on the origins of rotation:The Newcastle tornado during VORTEX 94. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 384–407.

  • Walko, R. L., 1988: Plausibility of substantial dry adiabatic subsidence in a tornado core. J. Atmos. Sci.,45, 2251–2267.

  • Weckwerth, T. M., J. W. Wilson, and R. M. Wakimoto, 1996: Thermodynamic variability within the convective boundary layer due to horizontal convective rolls. Mon. Wea. Rev.,124, 769–784.

  • Wilczak, J. M., and J. W. Glendening, 1988: Observation and mixed-layer modeling of a terrain-induced mesoscale gyre: The Denver cyclone. Mon. Wea. Rev.,116, 2688–2711.

  • Wilson, J. W., 1986: Tornadogenesis by nonprecipitation induced wind shear lines. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 270–284.

  • ——, and W. E. Schreiber, 1986: Initiation of convective storms along radar-observed boundary-layer convergence lines. Mon. Wea. Rev.,114, 2516–2536.

  • ——, G. B. Foote, N. A. Crook, J. C. Fankhauser, C. G. Wade, J. D. Tuttle, C. K. Mueller, and S. K. Krueger, 1992: The role of boundary-layer convergence zones and horizontal rolls in the initiation of thunderstorms: A case study. Mon. Wea. Rev.,120, 1785–1815.

  • Wurman, J., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 1996: Fine-scale Doppler radar observations of tornadic storms. Science,272, 1774–1777.

  • Xu, Q., and M. W. Moncrieff, 1994: Density current circulations in shear flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 434–446.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 203 57 20
PDF Downloads 88 32 2
Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Numerical Simulation of Nonsupercell Tornadogenesis. Part III: Parameter Tests Investigating the Role of CAPE, Vortex Sheet Strength, and Boundary Layer Vertical Shear

Bruce D. LeeDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado

Search for other papers by Bruce D. Lee in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
and
Robert B. WilhelmsonDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, Illinois

Search for other papers by Robert B. Wilhelmson in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMedClose
Print Publication:
01 Jul 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<2246:TNSONT>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
2246–2261
Restricted access

Abstract

Nonsupercell tornadogenesis has been investigated in a three-part numerical study. Building on the results of Parts I and II, Part III addresses the sensitivity of nonsupercell tornadogenesis to variations in convective available potential energy (CAPE), outflow boundary vortex sheet strength, and boundary layer vertical shear. A three-dimensional, nonhydrostatic, quasi-compressible convective cloud model has been employed to examine nonsupercell tornado (NST) development in an environment typical of the Colorado high plains.

A strong relationship was shown to exist between the magnitude of the environmental CAPE and the structure and intensity of the misocyclones and nonsupercell tornadoes that developed. As CAPE was increased from 0 to 1700 J kg−1, the simulated vortices markedly contracted and intensified. Multiple CAPE thresholds were identified that yielded markedly different vortex intensity. The highest CAPE runs produced NST families with peak ground-relative surface winds of ∼47 m s−1.

Vortex sheet strength along the outflow boundary played a controlling role in the upscale progression of misocyclones. Higher sheet strength was related to an accelerated rate of vorticity concentration and generally larger misocyclone circulations along the outflow boundary. A threshold value of sheet strength existed that delineated conditions supportive of tornado strength vortex development from those only supportive of nontornadic misocyclones.

The boundary layer vertical shear simulations revealed a marked variability in misocyclone/NST intensity and coherency as the ambient boundary layer vertical shear was varied. A vertical shear window approximately ranging from 80% to 120% of optimal boundary layer vertical shear was identified that was supportive of deep and intense tornadic circulations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bruce D. Lee, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, 501 20th St., Greeley, CO 80639.

Email: bdlee@unco.edu

Abstract

Nonsupercell tornadogenesis has been investigated in a three-part numerical study. Building on the results of Parts I and II, Part III addresses the sensitivity of nonsupercell tornadogenesis to variations in convective available potential energy (CAPE), outflow boundary vortex sheet strength, and boundary layer vertical shear. A three-dimensional, nonhydrostatic, quasi-compressible convective cloud model has been employed to examine nonsupercell tornado (NST) development in an environment typical of the Colorado high plains.

A strong relationship was shown to exist between the magnitude of the environmental CAPE and the structure and intensity of the misocyclones and nonsupercell tornadoes that developed. As CAPE was increased from 0 to 1700 J kg−1, the simulated vortices markedly contracted and intensified. Multiple CAPE thresholds were identified that yielded markedly different vortex intensity. The highest CAPE runs produced NST families with peak ground-relative surface winds of ∼47 m s−1.

Vortex sheet strength along the outflow boundary played a controlling role in the upscale progression of misocyclones. Higher sheet strength was related to an accelerated rate of vorticity concentration and generally larger misocyclone circulations along the outflow boundary. A threshold value of sheet strength existed that delineated conditions supportive of tornado strength vortex development from those only supportive of nontornadic misocyclones.

The boundary layer vertical shear simulations revealed a marked variability in misocyclone/NST intensity and coherency as the ambient boundary layer vertical shear was varied. A vertical shear window approximately ranging from 80% to 120% of optimal boundary layer vertical shear was identified that was supportive of deep and intense tornadic circulations.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Bruce D. Lee, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, 501 20th St., Greeley, CO 80639.

Email: bdlee@unco.edu

Save