Implications of Microphysics for Cloud-Radiation Parameterizations: Lessons from TOGA COARE

Sam F. Iacobellis Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Sam F. Iacobellis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Richard C. J. Somerville Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Search for other papers by Richard C. J. Somerville in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Restricted access

We are aware of a technical issue preventing figures and tables from showing in some newly published articles in the full-text HTML view.
While we are resolving the problem, please use the online PDF version of these articles to view figures and tables.

Abstract

A single-column model (SCM) and observational data collected during TOGA COARE were used to investigate the sensitivity of model-produced cloud properties and radiative fluxes to the representation of cloud microphysics in the cloud-radiation parameterizations. Four 78-day SCM numerical experiments were conducted for the atmospheric column overlying the COARE Intensive Flux Array. Each SCM experiment used a different cloud-radiation parameterization with a different representation of cloud microphysics.

All the SCM experiments successfully reproduced most of the observed temporal variability in precipitation, cloud fraction, shortwave and longwave cloud forcing, and downwelling surface shortwave flux. The magnitude and temporal variability of the downward surface longwave flux was overestimated by all the SCM experiments. This bias is probably due to clouds forming too low in the model atmosphere. Time-averaged model results were used to examine the sensitivity of model performance to the differences between the four cloud-radiation parameterization packages. The SCM versions that calculated cloud amount as a function of cloud liquid water, instead of using a relative humidity-based cloud scheme, produced smaller amounts of both low and deep convective clouds. Additionally, larger high (cirrus) cloud emissivities were obtained with interactive cloud liquid water schemes than with the relative humidity-based scheme. Surprisingly, calculating cloud optical properties as a function of cloud liquid water amount, instead of parameterizing them based on temperature, humidity, and pressure, resulted in relatively little change in radiative fluxes. However, model radiative fluxes were sensitive to the specification of the effective cloud droplet radius. Optically thicker low clouds and optically thinner high clouds were produced when an interactive effective cloud droplet radius scheme was used instead of specifying a constant value. Comparison of model results to both surface and satellite observations revealed that model experiments that calculated cloud properties as a function of cloud liquid water produced more realistic cloud amounts and radiative fluxes. The most realistic vertical distribution of clouds was obtained from the SCM experiment that included the most complete representation of cloud microphysics. Due to the limitations of SCMs, the above conclusions are model dependent and need to be tested in a general circulation model.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sam Iacobellis, Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0224.

Abstract

A single-column model (SCM) and observational data collected during TOGA COARE were used to investigate the sensitivity of model-produced cloud properties and radiative fluxes to the representation of cloud microphysics in the cloud-radiation parameterizations. Four 78-day SCM numerical experiments were conducted for the atmospheric column overlying the COARE Intensive Flux Array. Each SCM experiment used a different cloud-radiation parameterization with a different representation of cloud microphysics.

All the SCM experiments successfully reproduced most of the observed temporal variability in precipitation, cloud fraction, shortwave and longwave cloud forcing, and downwelling surface shortwave flux. The magnitude and temporal variability of the downward surface longwave flux was overestimated by all the SCM experiments. This bias is probably due to clouds forming too low in the model atmosphere. Time-averaged model results were used to examine the sensitivity of model performance to the differences between the four cloud-radiation parameterization packages. The SCM versions that calculated cloud amount as a function of cloud liquid water, instead of using a relative humidity-based cloud scheme, produced smaller amounts of both low and deep convective clouds. Additionally, larger high (cirrus) cloud emissivities were obtained with interactive cloud liquid water schemes than with the relative humidity-based scheme. Surprisingly, calculating cloud optical properties as a function of cloud liquid water amount, instead of parameterizing them based on temperature, humidity, and pressure, resulted in relatively little change in radiative fluxes. However, model radiative fluxes were sensitive to the specification of the effective cloud droplet radius. Optically thicker low clouds and optically thinner high clouds were produced when an interactive effective cloud droplet radius scheme was used instead of specifying a constant value. Comparison of model results to both surface and satellite observations revealed that model experiments that calculated cloud properties as a function of cloud liquid water produced more realistic cloud amounts and radiative fluxes. The most realistic vertical distribution of clouds was obtained from the SCM experiment that included the most complete representation of cloud microphysics. Due to the limitations of SCMs, the above conclusions are model dependent and need to be tested in a general circulation model.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Sam Iacobellis, Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093-0224.

Save
  • Baran, A. J., P. D. Watts, and J. S. Foot, 1998: Potential retrieval of dominating crystal habit and size using radiance data from a dual-view and multiwavelength instrument: A tropical cirrus anvil case. J. Geophys. Res.,103, 6075–6082.

  • Beepak, A., and H. E. Gerber, Eds., 1983: Report of WMO (CAS)/Radiation Commission of IAMAP meeting of experts on aerosols and their climatic effects. WCP-55, 107 pp.

  • Bower, K. N., T. W. Choularton, J. Latham, J. Nelson, M. B. Baker, and J. Jensen, 1994: A parameterization of warm clouds for use in atmospheric general circulation models. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 2722–2732.

  • Cess, R. D., and Coauthors, 1990: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 16 601–16 615.

  • Chou, M.-D., and W. Zhao, 1997: Estimation and model validation of surface solar radiation and cloud radiative forcing using TOGA COARE measurements. J. Climate,10, 610–620.

  • Cox, S. K., and K. T. Griffith, 1979: Estimates of radiative divergence during Phase III of the GARP Atlantic Tropical Experiment. Part II: Analysis of Phase III results. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 586–601.

  • Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, D. P. Rogers, J. B. Edson, and G. S. Young, 1996: Bulk parameterization of air–sea fluxes for TOGA COARE. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 3747–3764.

  • Flament, P., and R. Bernstein, 1993: Images from the GMS-4 satellite during TOGA-COARE (November 1992 to February 1993). Tech. Rep. 93-06, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, 20 pp. [Available from SOEST, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822.].

  • Fouquart, Y., and B. Bonnel, 1980: Computation of solar heating of the Earth’s atmosphere: A new parameterization. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,53, 35–62.

  • Frank, W. M., H. Wang, and J. L. McBride, 1996: Rawinsonde budget analyses during the TOGA COARE IOP. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 1761–1780.

  • Gates, W. L., 1992: AMIP: The Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,73, 1962–1970.

  • Hack, J. J., 1994: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2). J. Geophys. Res.,99, 5551–5568.

  • ——, 1998: Sensitivity of the simulated climate to a diagnostic formulation for cloud liquid water. J. Climate,11, 1497–1515.

  • ——, B. A. Boville, B. P. Briegleb, J. T. Kiehl, P. J. Rasch, and D. L. Williamson, 1993: Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM2). NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-382+STR, 108 pp. [Available from NCAR, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307-3000.].

  • Han, Q., W. B. Rossow, and A. A. Lacis, 1994: Near-global survey of effective droplet radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data. J. Climate,7, 465–497.

  • Heymsfield, A. J., and C. M. R. Platt, 1984: A parameterization of the particle size spectrum of ice clouds in terms of the ambient temperature and the ice water content. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 846–855.

  • Iacobellis, S. F., II, and R. C. J. Somerville, 1991a: Diagnostic modeling of the Indian monsoon onset. Part I: Model description and validation. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 1948–1959.

  • ——, and ——, 1991b: Diagnostic modeling of the Indian monsoon onset. Part II: Budget and sensitivity studies. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 1960–1971.

  • Jensen, E. J., O. B. Toon, H. B. Selkirk, J. D. Spinhirne, and M. R. Schoeberl, 1996: On the formation and persistence of subvisible cirrus clouds near the tropical tropopause. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 21 361–21 375.

  • Knollenberg, R. G., K. Kelly, and J. C. Wilson, 1993: Measurements of high number densities of ice crystals in the tops of tropical cumulonimbus. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 8639–8664.

  • Kristament, I. S., J. B. Liley, and M. J. Harvey, 1993: Aerosol variability in the vertical in the Southwest Pacific. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 7129–7139.

  • Lee, W.-H., S. F. Iacobellis, and R. C. J. Somerville, 1997: Cloud radiation forcings and feedbacks: General circulation model tests and observational validation. J. Climate,10, 2479–2496.

  • Liao, X., W. B. Rossow, and D. Rind, 1995: Comparison between SAGE II and ISCCP high-level clouds, 1, Global and zonal mean cloud amounts. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 1121–1136.

  • Lin, X., and R. H. Johnson, 1996: Heating, moistening, and rainfall over the western Pacific warm pool during TOGA COARE. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 3367–3383.

  • Liu, G., and J. A. Curry, 1993: Determination of characteristic features of cloud liquid water from satellite microwave measurements. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 5069–5092.

  • ——, ——, and R.-S. Sheu, 1995: Classification of clouds over the western equatorial Pacific Ocean using combined infrared and microwave satellite data. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 13 811–13 826.

  • Martin, G. M., D. W. Johnson, and A. Spice, 1994: The measurement and parameterization of effective radius of droplets in warm stratocumulus clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,51, 1823–1842.

  • McClatchey, R. A., R. W. Fenn, J. E. A. Selby, F. E. Volz, and J. S. Garing, 1972: Optical properties of the atmosphere. 3d ed. AFCRL Environmental Research Papers, No. 411, 108 pp.

  • McFarlane, N. A., G. J. Boer, J.-P. Blanchet, and M. Lazare, 1992: The Canadian Climate Centre second-generation general circulation model and its equilibrium climate. J. Climate,5, 1013–1044.

  • McFarquhar, G. M., and A. J. Heymsfield, 1996: Microphysical characteristics of three anvils sampled during the Central Equatorial Pacific Experiment. J. Atmos. Sci.,53, 2401–2423.

  • ——, and ——, 1997: Parameterization of tropical cirrus ice crystal size distributions and implications for radiative transfer: Results from CEPEX. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2187–2200.

  • ——, and ——, 1998: The definition and significance of an effective radius for ice clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2039–2052.

  • Miller, E. R., and A. C. Riddle, 1994: TOGA COARE Integrated Sounding System data report. Vol. IA Revised ed., NCAR.

  • Mokhov, I. I., and M. E. Schlesinger, 1993: Analysis of global cloudiness. 1. Comparison of Meteor, Nimbus 7, and International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) satellite data. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 12 849–12 868.

  • Morcrette, J.-J., 1990: Impact of changes to the radiation transfer parameterizations plus cloud optical properties in the ECMWF model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,118, 847–873.

  • Parsons, D., and Coauthors, 1994: The Integrated Sounding System:Description and preliminary observations from TOGA COARE. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,75, 553–567.

  • Platt, C. M. R., and Harshvardhan, 1988: Temperature dependence of cirrus extinction: Implications for climate feedback. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 11 051–11 058.

  • Randall, D. A., K.-M. Xu, R. C. J. Somerville, and S. Iacobellis, 1996: Single-column models and cloud ensemble models as links between observations and climate models. J. Climate,9, 1683–1697.

  • Rossow, W. L., and R. A. Schiffer, 1991: ISCCP cloud data products. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.,72, 2–21.

  • Sheu, R.-S., J. A. Curry, and G. Liu, 1996: Satellite retrieval of tropical precipitation using combined International Cloud Climatology Project DX and SSM/I data. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 21 291–21 301.

  • ——, ——, and ——, 1997: Vertical stratification of tropical cloud properties as determined from satellite. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 4231–4246.

  • Slingo, A., 1989: A GCM parameterization for the shortwave radiative properties of water clouds. J. Atmos. Sci.,46, 1419–1427.

  • Slingo, J. M., 1987: The development and verification of a cloud prediction scheme for the ECMWF model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,113, 899–927.

  • Smith, R. N. B., 1990: A scheme for predicting layer clouds and their water content in a general circulation model. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,116, 435–460.

  • Sundqvist, H., E. Berge, and J. E. Kristjánsson, 1989: Condensation and cloud parameterization studies with a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,117, 1641–1657.

  • Suzuki, T., M. Tanaka, and T. Nakajima, 1993: The microphysical feedback of cirrus cloud in climate change. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan,71, 701–713.

  • Tiedtke, M., 1993: Representation of clouds in large-scale models. Mon. Wea. Rev.,121, 3040–3061.

  • Vong, R. J., and D. S. Covert, 1998: Simultaneous observations of aerosol and cloud droplet size spectra in marine stratocumulus. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2180–2192.

  • Weare, B. C., and Coauthors, 1995: Evaluation of total cloudiness and its variability in the Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project. J. Climate,8, 2224–2238.

  • Wentz, F. J., 1989: User’s manual: SSM/I geophysical tapes. RSS Tech. Rep. 060989, Remote Sensing Systems, Santa Rosa, CA, 16 pp. [Available from Remote Sensing Systems, 1101 College Ave., Suite 220, Santa Rosa, CA 95404.].

  • Wielicki, B. A., and L. Parker, 1992: On the determination of cloud cover from satellite sensors: The effect of sensor spatial resolution. J. Geophys. Res.,97, 12 799–12 824.

  • Wyser, K., 1998: The effective radius in ice clouds. J. Climate,11, 1793–1802.

  • Yanai, M., S. Esbensen, and J. H. Chu, 1973: Determination of bulk properties of tropical cloud clusters from large-scale heat and moisture budgets. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 611–627.

  • Zhang, G. J., and N. A. McFarlane, 1995: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre general circulation model. Atmos.–Ocean,33, 407–446.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 839 640 188
PDF Downloads 109 28 1