Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Simulation of the Effects of Bathymetry and Land–Sea Contrasts on Hurricane Development Using a Coupled Ocean–Atmosphere Model

N. Cubukcu Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by N. Cubukcu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
R. L. Pfeffer Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Institute and Department of Meteorology, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida

Search for other papers by R. L. Pfeffer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
D. E. Dietrich Center for Air–Sea Technology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi

Search for other papers by D. E. Dietrich in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0481:SOTEOB>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
481–492
Restricted access

Abstract

A version of the Naval Research Laboratory Limited Area Dynamical Weather Prediction Model is coupled with the DieCAST ocean circulation model, which is particularly well suited for the specification of realistic bathymetry. The resulting coupled model, with 11 levels in the atmosphere and 20 in the ocean, is used to study the sensitivity of hurricane formation, intensification, and weakening in the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean region to the presence of land–sea contrasts and bathymetry in this region. Numerical simulations with the fully coupled model, Gulf of Mexico, and Carribean geography and bathymetry are compared with simulations with coupling and no geometry or bathymetry and also with simulations using the uncoupled atmospheric model.

The primary finding is that land–sea contrast and bathymetry reduce the intensification of the tropical disturbance, even when the hurricane is far from shore. The effect of drier air coming off the land masses surrounding the Gulf, which can penetrate to the storm center in a day, is to reduce the moisture supply and thereby decrease the rate of intensification of the storm. This is true in both the coupled and uncoupled model integrations. In the coupled model simulations, inertia currents and vertical mixing and upwelling on the continental shelf cause more intense and more widespread sea surface cooling in the presence of land–sea contrasts and bathymetry than in its absence, further reducing the rate of intensification.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Nihat Cubukcu, Department of Meteorology, 411 Love Building, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.

Abstract

A version of the Naval Research Laboratory Limited Area Dynamical Weather Prediction Model is coupled with the DieCAST ocean circulation model, which is particularly well suited for the specification of realistic bathymetry. The resulting coupled model, with 11 levels in the atmosphere and 20 in the ocean, is used to study the sensitivity of hurricane formation, intensification, and weakening in the Gulf of Mexico and the Carribean region to the presence of land–sea contrasts and bathymetry in this region. Numerical simulations with the fully coupled model, Gulf of Mexico, and Carribean geography and bathymetry are compared with simulations with coupling and no geometry or bathymetry and also with simulations using the uncoupled atmospheric model.

The primary finding is that land–sea contrast and bathymetry reduce the intensification of the tropical disturbance, even when the hurricane is far from shore. The effect of drier air coming off the land masses surrounding the Gulf, which can penetrate to the storm center in a day, is to reduce the moisture supply and thereby decrease the rate of intensification of the storm. This is true in both the coupled and uncoupled model integrations. In the coupled model simulations, inertia currents and vertical mixing and upwelling on the continental shelf cause more intense and more widespread sea surface cooling in the presence of land–sea contrasts and bathymetry than in its absence, further reducing the rate of intensification.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Nihat Cubukcu, Department of Meteorology, 411 Love Building, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Arakawa, A., and W. H. Schubert, 1974: Interaction of a cumulus cloud ensemble with the large-scale environment, Part I. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 674–701.

  • Bender, M. A., I. Ginis, and Y. Kurihara, 1993: Numerical simulations of tropical cyclone ocean interaction with a high-resolution coupled model. J. Geophys. Res.,98, 23 245–23 263.

  • Bottomley, M., C. K. Folland, J. Hsiung, R. E. Newell, and D. E. Parker, 1990: Global Ocean Surface Temperature Atlas. U. K. Meteorological Office and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 207 pp.

  • Challa, M., and R. L. Pfeffer, 1990: Formulation of Atlantic hurricanes from cloud clusters and depressions. J. Atmos. Sci.,47, 909–927.

  • ——, ——, Q. Zhao, and S. W. Chang 1998: Can eddy fluxes serve as a catalyst for hurricane and typhoon formation? J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2201–2219.

  • Chang, S. W., 1985: Deep ocean response to hurricane as revealed by an ocean model with free surface. Part I: Axisymmetric case. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,15, 1847–1858.

  • ——, and R. A. Anthes, 1978: Numerical simulations of the ocean’s nonlinear, baroclinic response to translating hurricanes. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,8, 468–480.

  • ——, and ——, 1979: The mutual response of the tropical cyclone and the ocean. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,9, 128–135.

  • ——, and R. V. Madala, 1980: Numerical simulation of the influence of sea surface temperature on translating tropical cyclones. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 2617–2630.

  • Cooper, C., and J. D. Thompson, 1989: Hurricane-generated currents on the outer continental shelf. Part II: Model sensitivity studies. J. Geophys. Res.,94, 12 540–12 554.

  • Cubukcu, N., 1997: A study of the ocean influences on a hurricane using a coupled ocean model with bathymetry and land-sea contrast. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Meteorology, The Florida State University, 121 pp. [Available from Dept. of Meteorology, Love Bldg., The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.].

  • Dietrich, D. E., 1993: Sandia ocean modeling system programmer’s guide and user’s manual. Sandia National Laboratories, Contract 55-5880, 52 pp. [Available from Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185.].

  • ——, and P. J. Roache, 1991: An accurate low dissipation model of the Gulf of Mexico circulation. Proc. Int. Symp. on Environmental Hydraulics, Hong Kong, China, 901–909.

  • ——, and D.-S. Ko, 1994: A semi-collocated ocean model based on the SOMS approach. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids,19, 1103–1113.

  • ——, and C. A. Lin, 1994: Numerical studies of eddy shedding in the Gulf of Mexico. J. Geophys. Res.,99, 7599–7615.

  • ——, M. G. Marietta, and P. J. Roache, 1987: An ocean modeling system with turbulent boundary layers and topography: Numerical description. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids,7, 833–855.

  • Emanuel, K. A, 1991: A scheme for representing cumulus convection in large-scale models. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 2313–2335.

  • Ginis, I., and Kh. Zh. Dikinov, 1989: Modeling of the Typhoon Virginia (1978) forcing on the ocean. Sov. Meteor. Hydrol. Rev. Engl. Transl.,7, 53–60.

  • Khain, A. P., and I. Ginis, 1991: The mutual response of a moving tropical cyclone and the ocean. Beitr. Phys. Atmos.,64, 125–141.

  • Kuo, H. L., 1974: Further studies of the parameterization of the influence of cumulus convection in large-scale flow. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 1232–1240.

  • Kurihara, Y., and R. E. Tuleya, 1974: Structure of a tropical cyclone in a three-dimensional numerical simulation model. J. Atmos. Sci.,31, 893–919.

  • Leipper, D. L., 1967: Observed ocean conditions and hurricane Hilda, 1964. J. Atmos. Sci.,24, 182–196.

  • Levitus, S., 1982: Climatological Atlas of the World Ocean. NOAA Prof. Paper 13, 173 pp.

  • Madala, R. V., S. W. Chang, U. C. Mohanty, S. C. Madan, R. K. Paliwal, V. B. Sarin, T. Holt, and S. Raman, 1987: Description of Naval Research Laboratory limited area dynamical weather prediction model. NRL Tech. Rep. 5992, Washington, DC, 131 pp. [Available from Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375-5000.].

  • Mao, Q., 1994: Numerical simulation of tropical cyclones in a coupled atmosphere–ocean model with nonuniform mixed layer depth. Ph.D. dissertation, The Florida State University, 180 pp. [Available from Dept. of Meteorology, Love Bldg., The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.].

  • McBride, J., and R. Zehr, 1981: Observational analysis of tropical cyclone formation. Part I: Basic description of data sets. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1117–1131.

  • O’Brien, J. J., and R. O. Reid, 1967: The non-linear response of a two-layer baroclinic ocean to a stationary, axially-symmetric hurricane. Part I: Upwelling induced by momentum transfer. J. Atmos. Sci.,24, 197–207.

  • Pfeffer, R. L., and M. Challa, 1981: A numerical study of the role of eddy fluxes of momentum in the development of Atlantic hurricanes. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 2393–2398.

  • ——, and ——, 1992: The role of environmental asymmetries in Atlantic hurricane formation. J. Atmos. Sci.,49, 1051–1059.

  • ——, ——, N. LaSeur, and W. Gray, 1990: Composite Atlantic tropical disturbance structure: Developing and non-developing disturbances. Florida State University Publication, 96 pp. [Available from Geophysical Dynamics Institute, Keen Bldg., The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306.].

  • Price, J. F., 1981: Upper ocean response to a hurricane. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,11, 153–175.

  • Roache, P. J., and D. E. Dietrich, 1988: Evaluation of the filtered leapfrog-trapezoidal time integration method. Numer. Heat Transfer,14, 149–164.

  • Rosenthal, S. L., 1978: Numerical simulation of tropical cyclone development with latent heat by resolvable scales. Part I: Model description and preliminary results. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 258–271.

  • Sanford, T. B., P. G. Black, J. R. Haustein, J. W. Feeney, G. Z. Forristall, and J. F. Price, 1987: Ocean response to a hurricane. Part I: Observations. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,17, 2065–2083.

  • Sundqvist, H., 1970: Numerical simulation of the development of tropical cyclones with a ten level model. Part 1. Tellus,22, 359–390.

  • Sutyrin, G. G., and A. P. Khain, 1979: Interaction of the ocean and the atmosphere in the area of moving tropical cyclone. Dokl. Akad. Sci. USSR,249, 467–470.

  • ——, and ——, 1984: On the effect of air–ocean interaction on intensity of moving tropical cyclone. Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,20, 697–703.

  • Tuleya, R. E., 1994: Tropical storm development and decay: Sensitivity to surface boundary conditions. Mon. Wea. Rev.,122, 291–304.

  • ——, M. A. Bender, and Y. Kurihara, 1984: A simulation of the landfall of tropical cyclones using a movable nested-mesh model. Mon. Wea. Rev.,112, 124–136.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1196 917 101
PDF Downloads 152 31 2