Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Mechanisms of Gravity Wave Focusing in the Middle Atmosphere

L. J. Sonmor Oceanography Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Search for other papers by L. J. Sonmor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
G. P. Klaassen Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada

Search for other papers by G. P. Klaassen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0493:MOGWFI>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
493–510
Restricted access

Abstract

This paper uses a time-dependent ray-tracing model to study focusing of gravity wave energy propagating upward through a wavelike background whose phases are descending—the dominant middle-atmosphere case. It demonstrates that these rays experience noncritical caustic focusing when the background is not both periodic over an infinite domain and limited to a single vertical phase speed. The superposition of even a small number of descending-phase background waves with well-separated vertical phase speeds readily yields caustics for upward-propagating rays possessing a wide range of initial group velocities. Encounters with an isolated background packet also result in caustics as or after the ray passes through the background packet, depending on the strength of the spatial modulation. Finally, the presence of mean shear in combination with descending-phase background wave motion introduces caustic focusing at much lower altitudes than would occur without the shear. The caustics found in these three background configurations do not correspond to “cgz ≃ czb events,” in which a ray’s vertical group velocity cgz matches the vertical phase speed czb of a background wave motion. Their existence suggests a mechanism for enhanced noncritical wave breaking and mean flow acceleration in the mesosphere due to the time-dependent nonlinear interactions within the broad gravity wave spectrum. This mechanism is not currently included in middle-atmosphere gravity wave drag parameterizations.

Corresponding author address: G. P. Klaassen, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, York University, North York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.

Abstract

This paper uses a time-dependent ray-tracing model to study focusing of gravity wave energy propagating upward through a wavelike background whose phases are descending—the dominant middle-atmosphere case. It demonstrates that these rays experience noncritical caustic focusing when the background is not both periodic over an infinite domain and limited to a single vertical phase speed. The superposition of even a small number of descending-phase background waves with well-separated vertical phase speeds readily yields caustics for upward-propagating rays possessing a wide range of initial group velocities. Encounters with an isolated background packet also result in caustics as or after the ray passes through the background packet, depending on the strength of the spatial modulation. Finally, the presence of mean shear in combination with descending-phase background wave motion introduces caustic focusing at much lower altitudes than would occur without the shear. The caustics found in these three background configurations do not correspond to “cgz ≃ czb events,” in which a ray’s vertical group velocity cgz matches the vertical phase speed czb of a background wave motion. Their existence suggests a mechanism for enhanced noncritical wave breaking and mean flow acceleration in the mesosphere due to the time-dependent nonlinear interactions within the broad gravity wave spectrum. This mechanism is not currently included in middle-atmosphere gravity wave drag parameterizations.

Corresponding author address: G. P. Klaassen, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, York University, North York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Broutman, D., 1984: The focusing of short internal waves by an inertial wave. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn.,30, 199–225.

  • ——, 1986: On internal wave caustics. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,16, 1625–1635.

  • ——, and W. R. Young, 1986: On the interaction of small-scale oceanic internal waves with near-inertial waves. J. Fluid Mech.,166, 341–358.

  • ——, C. Macaskill, M. E. McIntyre, and J. W. Rottman, 1997: On Doppler-spreading models of internal waves. Geophys. Res. Lett.,24, 2813–2816.

  • Bruhwiler, D. L., and T. J. Kaper, 1995: Wavenumber transport: Scattering of small-scale internal waves by large-scale wavepackets. J. Fluid Mech.,289, 379–405.

  • Dunkerton, T. J., 1984: Inertia-gravity waves in the stratosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,41, 3396–3404.

  • Eckermann, S. D., 1997: Influence of wave propagation on the Doppler-spreading of atmospheric gravity waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2554–2573.

  • ——, and C. J. Marks, 1996: An idealized ray model of gravity wave–tidal interactions. J. Geophys. Res.,101, 21 195–21 212.

  • ——, I. Hirota, and W. K. Hocking, 1995: Gravity wave and equatorial wave morphology of the stratosphere derived from long-term rocket soundings. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,121, 149–186.

  • Fritts, D. C., and W. Lu, 1993: Spectral estimates of gravity wave energy and momentum fluxes. Part II: Parameterization of wave forcing and variability. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 3695–3713.

  • Garrett, C. J. R., 1968: On the interaction between internal gravity waves and a shear flow. J. Fluid Mech.,34, 711–720.

  • Hall, G. E., C. E. Meek, and A. H. Manson, 1995: Hodograph analysis of mesopause region winds observed by three MF radars in the Canadian prairies. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 7411–7421.

  • Hamilton, K. P., 1997: The role of parameterized drag in a troposphere–stratosphere–mesosphere general circulation model. Gravity Wave Processes: Their Parameterization in Global Climate Models, K. Hamilton, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 337–350.

  • Hayes, W. D., 1970: Kinematic wave theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. London,320A, 209–226.

  • Henyey, F. S., and N. Pomphrey, 1983: Eikonal description of internal wave interactions: A non-diffusive picture of “induced diffusion.” Dyn. Atmos. Oceans,7, 189–219.

  • ——, J. Wright, and S. M. Flatté, 1986: Energy and action flow through the internal wave field: An eikonal approach. J. Geophys. Res.,91, 8487–8495.

  • Hines, C. O., 1991: The saturation of gravity waves in the middle atmosphere. Part II: Development of Doppler-spread theory. J. Atmos. Sci.,48, 1360–1379.

  • ——, 1997: Doppler-spread parameterization of gravity–wave momentum deposition in the middle atmosphere. Part 1: Basic formulation. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.,59, 371–400.

  • Lindzen, R. S., 1981: Turbulence and stress owing to gravity wave and tidal breakdown. J. Geophys. Res.,86, 9707–9714.

  • Manson, A. H., and Coauthors, 1989: Climatologies of semi-diurnal and diurnal tides in the middle atmosphere (70–110 km) at middle latitudes (40°–55°). J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.,51, 579–593.

  • Manzini, E., N. A. McFarlane, and C. McLandress, 1997: Impact of the Doppler-spread parameterization on the simulation of the middle atmosphere circulation using the MA/ECHAM4 general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res.,102, 25 751–25 762.

  • McFarlane, N. A., C. McLandress, and S. R. Beagley, 1997: Seasonal simulations with the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model: Sensitivity to a combination of orographic and Doppler-spread parameterizations. Gravity Wave Processes: Their Parameterization in Global Climate Models, K. Hamilton, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 351–366.

  • Medvedev, A. S., and G. P. Klaassen, 1995: Vertical evolution of gravity wave spectra and the parameterization of associated wave drag. J. Geophys. Res.,100, 25 841–25 853.

  • ——, ——, and S. R. Beagley, 1998: On the role of an anisotropic spectrum in maintaining the circulation of the middle atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett.,25, 509–512.

  • Mengel, J. G., H. G. Mayr, K. L. Chan, C. O. Hines, C. A. Reddy, N. F. Arnold, and H. S. Porter, 1995: Equatorial oscillations in the middle atmosphere generated by small scale gravity waves. Geophys. Res. Lett.,22, 3027–3030.

  • Norton, W. A., and J. Thuburn, 1997: The mesosphere in the Extended UGAMP Model. Gravity Wave Processes: Their Parameterization in Global Climate Models, K. Hamilton, Ed., Springer-Verlag, 383–401.

  • Peregrine, D. H., and R. Smith, 1979: Nonlinear effects upon waves near caustics. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London,292, 341–370.

  • Phillips, O. M., 1977: The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. 2d ed. Cambridge University Press, 336 pp.

  • Sonmor, L. J., and G. P. Klaassen, 1997: Toward a unified theory of gravity wave stability. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 2655–2680.

  • Vincent, R. A., T. Tsuda, and S. Kato, 1988: A comparative study of mesospheric solar tides observed at Adelaide and Kyoto. J. Geophys. Res.,93, 699–708.

  • Winters, K. B., and E. A. D’Asaro, 1997: Direct simulation of internal wave energy transfer. J. Phys. Oceanogr.,27, 1937–1945.

  • Zhong, L., L. J. Sonmor, A. H. Manson, and C. E. Meek, 1995: The influence of time-dependent wind on gravity–wave propagation in the middle atmosphere. Ann. Geophys.,13, 375–394.

  • ——, A. H. Manson, L. J. Sonmor, and C. E. Meek, 1996: Gravity wave exclusion circles in background flows modulated by the semidiurnal tide. Ann. Geophys.,14, 557–565.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 647 418 36
PDF Downloads 45 9 0