Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

The Influence of a Local Swirl Ratio on Tornado Intensification near the Surface

D. C. Lewellen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

Search for other papers by D. C. Lewellen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
,
W. S. Lewellen Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

Search for other papers by W. S. Lewellen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
, and
J. Xia Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia

Search for other papers by J. Xia in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Feb 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0527:TIOALS>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
527–544
Restricted access

Abstract

The results of high-resolution, fully three-dimensional, unsteady simulations of the interaction of a tornado with the surface are presented. The goal is to explore some of the range of structures that should be expected to occur in nature within the tornadic “corner flow”—that region where the central vortex meets the surface. The most important physical variables considered are the tornado-scale circulation and horizontal convergence, the effective surface roughness, the tornado translation speed, the low-level inflow structure, and the upper-core structure. A key ingredient of the corner flow dynamics is the radial influx of fluid in the surface layer with low angular momentum relative to that of the fluid in the main vortex above it. This low swirl fluid arises initially from outside or below the larger-scale vortex or through frictional loss of angular momentum to the surface and forms much of the vortex core flow after it exits the corner flow region. Changes in the surface layer inflow or upper-core structure can dramatically affect the level of intensification and turbulent structure in the corner flow even when the swirl ratio of the tornado vortex as a whole is unchanged. The authors define a local corner flow swirl ratio, Sc, based on the total flux of low angular momentum fluid through the corner flow and show that it parameterizes the leading effects on the corner flow of changes to the flow conditions immediately outside of the corner flow. As Sc decreases, the low-level vortex intensity rises to a maximal level where mean swirl velocities near the surface reach 2.5 times the maximum mean swirl velocity aloft; further decreases force a transition to a much weaker low-level tornado vortex. This sensitivity suggests that differences in the near-surface inflow layer may be a critical factor in determining whether an existing supercell low-level mesocyclone spawns a tornado or not.

Corresponding author address: Dr. David C. Lewellen, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6106, Morgantown, WV 26506-6106.

Abstract

The results of high-resolution, fully three-dimensional, unsteady simulations of the interaction of a tornado with the surface are presented. The goal is to explore some of the range of structures that should be expected to occur in nature within the tornadic “corner flow”—that region where the central vortex meets the surface. The most important physical variables considered are the tornado-scale circulation and horizontal convergence, the effective surface roughness, the tornado translation speed, the low-level inflow structure, and the upper-core structure. A key ingredient of the corner flow dynamics is the radial influx of fluid in the surface layer with low angular momentum relative to that of the fluid in the main vortex above it. This low swirl fluid arises initially from outside or below the larger-scale vortex or through frictional loss of angular momentum to the surface and forms much of the vortex core flow after it exits the corner flow region. Changes in the surface layer inflow or upper-core structure can dramatically affect the level of intensification and turbulent structure in the corner flow even when the swirl ratio of the tornado vortex as a whole is unchanged. The authors define a local corner flow swirl ratio, Sc, based on the total flux of low angular momentum fluid through the corner flow and show that it parameterizes the leading effects on the corner flow of changes to the flow conditions immediately outside of the corner flow. As Sc decreases, the low-level vortex intensity rises to a maximal level where mean swirl velocities near the surface reach 2.5 times the maximum mean swirl velocity aloft; further decreases force a transition to a much weaker low-level tornado vortex. This sensitivity suggests that differences in the near-surface inflow layer may be a critical factor in determining whether an existing supercell low-level mesocyclone spawns a tornado or not.

Corresponding author address: Dr. David C. Lewellen, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6106, Morgantown, WV 26506-6106.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Burggraf, O. R., and M. R. Foster, 1977: Continuation of breakdown in tornado-like vortices. J. Fluid Mech.,80, 685–703.

  • ——, K. Stewartson, and R. Belcher, 1971: Boundary layer induced by a potential vortex. Phys. Fluids,14, 1821–1833.

  • Church, C. R., J. T. Snow, G. L. Baker, and E. M. Agee, 1979: Characteristics of tornado-like vortices as a function of swirl ratio: A laboratory investigation. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 1755–1776.

  • Davies-Jones, R. P., 1973: The dependence of core radius on swirl ratio in a tornado simulator. J. Atmos. Sci.,30, 1427–1430.

  • ——, 1986: Tornado dynamics. Thunderstorms: A Social and Technological Documentary, E. Kessler, Ed., Vol. II, University of Oklahoma, 197–236.

  • Fiedler, B. H., 1993: Numerical simulation of axisymmetric tornadogenesis in forced convection. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, C. Church et al., Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 41–48.

  • ——, and R. Rotunno, 1986: A theory for the maximum windspeed in tornado-like vortices. J. Atmos. Sci.,43, 2328–2340.

  • Hall, M. G., 1972: Vortex breakdown. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.,4, 195–218.

  • Leslie, F. W., 1977: Surface roughness effects on suction vortex formation: A laboratory simulation. J. Atmos. Sci.,34, 1022–1027.

  • Lewellen, W. S., 1962: A solution for three-dimensional vortex flows with strong circulation. J. Fluid Mech.,14, 420–432.

  • ——, 1993: Tornado vortex theory. The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards, C. Church et al., Eds., Amer. Geophys. Union, 19–40.

  • ——, and Y. P. Sheng, 1980: Modeling tornado dynamics. Tech. Rep. NTIS NUREG/CR-2585, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 227 pp. [Available from NTIS, Sills Building, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.].

  • ——, D. C. Lewellen, and R. I. Sykes, 1997: Large-eddy simulation of a tornado’s interaction with the surface. J. Atmos. Sci.,54, 581–605.

  • Long, R. R., 1958: Vortex motion in a viscous fluid. J. Meteor.,15, 108–112.

  • Rott, N., 1958: On the viscous core of a line vortex. Z. Math. Phys.,9, 543–553.

  • Shtern, V., and F. Hussain, 1993: Hystersis in a swirling jet as a model tornado. Phys. Fluids A,5, 2183–2195.

  • Snow, J. T., 1982: A review of recent advances in tornado vortex dynamics. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys.,20, 953–964.

  • Wakimoto, R. M., and C. Liu, 1998: The Garden City, Kansas, storm during VORTEX 95. Part II: The wall cloud and tornado. Mon. Wea. Rev.,126, 393–408.

  • Ward, N. B., 1972: The exploration of certain features of tornado dynamics using a laboratory model. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 1149–1204.

  • Wilson, T., and R. Rotunno, 1986: Numerical simulation of a laminar end-wall vortex and boundary layer. Phys. Fluids,29, 3993–4005.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2287 728 47
PDF Downloads 1526 290 20