Editorial Type:
Article
Article Type:
Research Article

Mountain Torques Caused by Normal-Mode Global Rossby Waves, and the Impact on Atmospheric Angular Momentum

Harald Lejenäs Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for other papers by Harald Lejenäs in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
and
Roland A. Madden National Center for Atmospheric Research*, Boulder, Colorado

Search for other papers by Roland A. Madden in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed Close
Print Publication:
01 Apr 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1045:MTCBNM>2.0.CO;2
Page(s):
1045–1051
Restricted access

Abstract

Planetary-scale free Rossby waves present in the earth’s atmosphere propagate toward the west. Pressure torques varying in time then arise as a consequence of unequal pressure on the eastern and western sides of mountains and small-scale topographic features. These torques, referred to as mountain torques, have an influence on the exchange of angular momentum between the atmosphere and the earth.

The authors investigated the impact of all identified planetary-scale free Rossby waves on atmospheric angular momentum by computing the contribution from mountain torques to the rate of change of total atmospheric angular momentum for each wave.

Comparing contributions from individual waves, the authors found that for the average wave amplitudes the maximum torque for a particular wave is around 2 Hadleys, and that considering all meridional wavenumbers, zonal wavenumber 2 causes the largest global torques. Changes in angular momentum depend on both the amplitude of the changing torque and on its period. As a result zonal wavenumbers 1 and 2 cause the largest angular momentum anomalies with peak-to-trough amplitudes of 2–5 × 1023 kg m2 s−1. The 16-day wave produces the largest amplitude, 4.9 × 1023 kg m2 s−1. These values refer to average amplitudes reported in the literature. Individual waves may cause anomalies five times as big.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Harald Lejenäs, Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Abstract

Planetary-scale free Rossby waves present in the earth’s atmosphere propagate toward the west. Pressure torques varying in time then arise as a consequence of unequal pressure on the eastern and western sides of mountains and small-scale topographic features. These torques, referred to as mountain torques, have an influence on the exchange of angular momentum between the atmosphere and the earth.

The authors investigated the impact of all identified planetary-scale free Rossby waves on atmospheric angular momentum by computing the contribution from mountain torques to the rate of change of total atmospheric angular momentum for each wave.

Comparing contributions from individual waves, the authors found that for the average wave amplitudes the maximum torque for a particular wave is around 2 Hadleys, and that considering all meridional wavenumbers, zonal wavenumber 2 causes the largest global torques. Changes in angular momentum depend on both the amplitude of the changing torque and on its period. As a result zonal wavenumbers 1 and 2 cause the largest angular momentum anomalies with peak-to-trough amplitudes of 2–5 × 1023 kg m2 s−1. The 16-day wave produces the largest amplitude, 4.9 × 1023 kg m2 s−1. These values refer to average amplitudes reported in the literature. Individual waves may cause anomalies five times as big.

Corresponding author address: Dr. Harald Lejenäs, Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.

Save
Cover Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences

  • Ahlquist, J. E., 1982: Normal-mode global Rossby waves: Theory and observations. J. Atmos. Sci.,39, 193–202.

  • ——, 1985: Climatology of normal mode Rossby waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,42, 2059–2068.

  • Boer, G. J., 1990: Earth–atmosphere exchange of angular momentum simulated in a general circulation model and implications for the length of day. J. Geophys. Res.,95, 5511–5531.

  • Deland, R. J., 1964: Traveling planetary waves. Tellus,16, 271–273.

  • ——, and Y. J. Lin, 1967: On the movement and prediction of planetary-scale waves. Mon. Wea. Rev.,95, 21–31.

  • Dikii, L. A., 1965: The terrestrial atmosphere as an oscillating system. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,1, 469–489.

  • ——, and G. Golitsyn, 1968: Calculations of the Rossby wave velocities in the Earth’s atmosphere. Tellus,20, 314–317.

  • Eliasen, E., and B. Machenhauer, 1965: A study of the fluctuations of atmospheric planetary flow patterns represented by spherical harmonics. Tellus,17, 220–238.

  • Eubanks, T. M., J. A. Steppe, J. O. Dickey, R. D. Rosen, and D. A. Salstein, 1988: Causes of rapid motions of the Earth’s pole. Nature,334, 115–119.

  • Gill, A. E., 1982: Atmosphere–Ocean Dynamics. Academic Press, 662 pp.

  • Golitsyn, G., and L. A. Dikii, 1966: Oscillations of planetary atmospheres as a function of the rotational speed of the planet. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Atmos. Oceanic Phys.,2, 225–235.

  • Haurwitz, B., 1940: The motion of atmospheric disturbances on the spherical earth. J. Mar. Res.,3, 254–267.

  • Hough, S. S., 1898: On the application of harmonic analysis to the dynamical theory of tides. II: On the general integration of Laplace’s dynamical equations. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London191A, 139–185.

  • Kasahara, A., 1976: Normal modes of ultralong waves in the atmosphere. Mon. Wea. Rev.,104, 669–690.

  • Lamb, H., 1932: Hydrodynamics. Dover, 738 pp.

  • Lounguet-Higgins, F. R. S., 1968: The eigenfunctions of Laplace’s tidal equations over a sphere. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London262A, 511–607.

  • Madden, R. A., 1978: Further evidence of traveling planetary waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,35, 1605–1618.

  • ——, 1979: Observations of large-scale traveling Rossby waves. Rev. Geophys. Space. Phys.,17, 1935–1949.

  • ——, and P. R. Julian, 1972: Further evidence of global-scale 5-day pressure waves. J. Atmos. Sci.,29, 1464–1469.

  • ——, and J. Stokes, 1975: Evidence of global-scale 5-day waves in a 73-year pressure record. J. Atmos. Sci.,32, 831–836.

  • ——, and K. Labitzke, 1981: A free Rossby wave in the troposphere and stratosphere during January 1979. J. Geophys. Res.,86 (C2), 1247–1254.

  • ——, and P. Speth, 1995: Estimates of angular momentum, friction, and mountain torques during 1987–1988. J. Atmos. Sci.,52, 3681–3694.

  • ——, H. Lejenäs, and J. J. Hack, 1998: Semidiurnal variations in the budget of angular momentum in a general circulation model and in the real atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci.,55, 2561–2575.

  • NCAR, cited 1998: U.S. Navy Global Elevation Data, 10-min (1984 DEC). [Available online at http://goldhill.cgd.ucar.edu/cms/ccm3/initial/topo.README.].

  • Salby, M. L., 1979: On the solution of the homogeneous vertical structure problem for long-period oscillations. J. Atmos. Sci.,36, 2350–2359.

  • ——, 1980: The influence of realistic dissipation on planetary normal structures. J. Atmos. Sci.,37, 2186—2199.

  • ——, 1981a: Rossby normal modes in nonuniform background configurations. Part I: Simple fields. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1803–1826.

  • ——, 1981b: Rossby normal modes in nonuniform background configurations. Part II: Equinox and solstice conditions. J. Atmos. Sci.,38, 1827–1840.

  • Weber, R. O., and R. A. Madden, 1993: Evidence of traveling external Rossby waves in the ECMWF analyses. J. Atmos. Sci.,50, 2994–3007.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 574 384 84
PDF Downloads 55 16 1